Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:56, 12 January 2008

/Archive Index

Vandalism on United States Navy.

Hi, you reverted me here, saying that this edit isn't vandalism. I disagree; the vandal says that a telegraph man, who served on a Landing Ship, Tank, is notable enough to be in the "Notable Sailors" section of the United States Navy article... doubtful. If he provided a source to recognize his claimed bravery (and ascertain that he is notable), I'd accept that (or at least do a bit more research instead of revert at first sight). However, a google search for "James Hann Anzio" (Anzio being the battle the vandal says James Hann fought in) lists zero relevant results. I will restore the warning. Thanks for covering my back anyway, I'm sure I'll need it sometime. :) · AndonicO 03:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case on Dan689 4

Sorry to have wasted your time; I didn't check the block log, but I didn't see any evidence on the user page that the account was blocked. Gladys J Cortez 22:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Ember, good job in tagging the total mess that this was. Thanks! Spellcast (talk) 09:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for filing RFCU

Thanks for filing the RFCU on User:Nathann sc. It's pretty clear to me what the deal is on that case, but it never hurts to have irrefutable evidence ;) --Dachannien_Contrib 18:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

San Vitores

Hi, thanks for your help with the San Vitores article! Can I ask why my edits were reverted? I was including the updated info saintsbox and some grammatical and wikifying edits. Thanks again! --Polylerus (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. --EoL talk 21:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Artisol2345 SSP case

I see that Artisol account was blocked for a week, however that was back in 2007. The Artisol2345 and AL2TB accounts are not (showing) blocked as of now. Artisol Block Log, AL2TB Block Log. Also, why would the SSP template be REMOVED from the Artisol userpage? It should have been updated with the AL2TB information if the case is over and proven, don't you think? Edit Centric (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Looking through the end process, there are several "hinky" things here. First, the SSP template was removed from the Artisol page. That shouldn't have happened, instead the resulting "confirmed sockpuppets" page should have been updated, from what I gather looking at other closed cases. Second, the confirmation was never placed on the AL2TB userpage. (See example from another confirmed Artisol sockpuppet, Alittlegoo. Thirdly, shouldn't an admin have closed this case? Edit Centric (talk) 02:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You blocked the wrong account. Apparently you didn't block anybody. Why the heck did you close the SSP then as "user blocked"?

Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)