Revision as of 23:56, 11 January 2008 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,540 edits create | Revision as of 01:20, 12 January 2008 edit undoR. fiend (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,208 edits →TemplateNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:'''Comment by parties:''' | :'''Comment by parties:''' | ||
:: | |||
::I hope I am doing this in the right place... | |||
::Well, I think I know where this is going. As I said before, I don't have the free time I had just a week or so ago, and I would really rather be doing other things with what I do have. I think one of the interesting comments to come out of the RfC was from Sarah777, who wondered why someone like me ever wanted to be an admin. That's a much better question than I realized at the time. The general reason I wanted the position in the first place was to take care of deletions and to block vandals. On reflection, I've done little of either in quite some time, and with my dearth of free time in the future, I don't think it's about to pick up. So maybe adminship isn't really important to me anymore. The best case scenario I can see from this is continuing to edit with a Sword of Damocles over my head, and I'd rather not have to deal with that. I have better things to do with my time than be involved in this process, I'm sure the other involved parties must, and from looking at the Arbcom page, it seems clear Arbcom does as well. So if it will put this matter to rest, and if it will save the trouble of going any further into this process, I'll step down as an administrator, and it would be highly unlikely I will seek it again. | |||
::I appreciate the time people have people have put into this, and the support I did receive (albeit limited). I think it should go without saying that my block of Ed Poor should not be held against him in any way (though I imagine it is not possible to remove all traces of it from the software). Anyway, I guess it will be a relief not to be held to higher standards than the general masses here. Thank you. -] (]) 01:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:'''Comment by others:''' | :'''Comment by others:''' |
Revision as of 01:20, 12 January 2008
This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.
Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators may edit, for voting.
Motions and requests by the parties
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- I hope I am doing this in the right place...
- Well, I think I know where this is going. As I said before, I don't have the free time I had just a week or so ago, and I would really rather be doing other things with what I do have. I think one of the interesting comments to come out of the RfC was from Sarah777, who wondered why someone like me ever wanted to be an admin. That's a much better question than I realized at the time. The general reason I wanted the position in the first place was to take care of deletions and to block vandals. On reflection, I've done little of either in quite some time, and with my dearth of free time in the future, I don't think it's about to pick up. So maybe adminship isn't really important to me anymore. The best case scenario I can see from this is continuing to edit with a Sword of Damocles over my head, and I'd rather not have to deal with that. I have better things to do with my time than be involved in this process, I'm sure the other involved parties must, and from looking at the Arbcom page, it seems clear Arbcom does as well. So if it will put this matter to rest, and if it will save the trouble of going any further into this process, I'll step down as an administrator, and it would be highly unlikely I will seek it again.
- I appreciate the time people have people have put into this, and the support I did receive (albeit limited). I think it should go without saying that my block of Ed Poor should not be held against him in any way (though I imagine it is not possible to remove all traces of it from the software). Anyway, I guess it will be a relief not to be held to higher standards than the general masses here. Thank you. -R. fiend (talk) 01:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment by others:
Template
2)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
3)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed temporary injunctions
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
3)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
4)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Questions to the parties
Proposed final decision
Proposals by User:X
Proposed Principles
Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposals by User:Y
Proposed Principles
Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposals by User:Z
Proposed Principles
Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Analysis of evidence
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
General discussion
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others: