| Revision as of 02:37, 15 January 2008 editAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,258 edits →You have violated the 3rr: Turtlescrubber← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:38, 15 January 2008 edit undoGwernol (talk | contribs)94,742 edits Warning,: please don't edit warNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| On Mitt Romney. You will be reported. Please stop further disruptive activity. ] (]) 02:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | On Mitt Romney. You will be reported. Please stop further disruptive activity. ] (]) 02:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Reverting vandalism is not a 3RR violation. Look at the edit summaries, and read the talk page.] (]) 02:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | :Reverting vandalism is not a 3RR violation. Look at the edit summaries, and read the talk page.] (]) 02:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning: edit warring on ] == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Mitt Romney|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 02:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:38, 15 January 2008
Archives
Archive 1: Beginning of Time to 14 March 2007 (plus one comment by Ferrylodge on 27 September 2007).
Archive 2: 14 March 2007 to 14 May 2007.
Archive 3: 14 May 2007 to 15 June 2007.
Archive 4: 15 June 2007 to 11 September 2007.
Archive 5: 11 September 2007 to 13 November 2007.
Archive 6: 13 November 2007 to 30 November 2007.
Archive 7: 30 November 2007 to 31 December 2007.
Arctic shrinkage
Ferrylodge, just wanted to say thanks for your work on the Arctic shrinkage page. It's becoming a very good article. Cheers Rosiestephenson (talk) 21:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, thanks for starting the article. :-)Ferrylodge (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
 |
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
I know that certain articles of interest to both of us are currently very contentious. I can't see myself protecting them, because I didn't expect to do that, but I can certainly see adding a request should the situations demand it. John Carter (talk) 23:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh darn, I was hoping I could completely rewrite the article and then get you to immediately protect it indefinitely. :-) Seriously, I'm glad you've taken an interest, which may lead to improvements.Ferrylodge (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
You have violated the 3rr
On Mitt Romney. You will be reported. Please stop further disruptive activity. Turtlescrubber (talk) 02:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Reverting vandalism is not a 3RR violation. Look at the edit summaries, and read the talk page.Ferrylodge (talk) 02:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Warning: edit warring on Mitt Romney
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mitt Romney. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Gwernol 02:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)