Revision as of 08:02, 16 January 2008 editAndonic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users36,449 edits →T:DYK.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:52, 18 January 2008 edit undoBuffs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,466 edits addNext edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
No problem. Interesting incident that happened there. :P · ] <sup>]</sup> 08:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | No problem. Interesting incident that happened there. :P · ] <sup>]</sup> 08:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Assistance request== | |||
On an RfA, was made. I realize this is an ArbCom issue, but I felt it should be deleted as a legal threat. Should I ever become an admin, I'd like to know your opinion on whether it should be deleted under ]. My opinion, yes. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 03:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:52, 18 January 2008
Johntex | Photography | Resources | To-Do | Talk |
---|
My contributions | My admin log |
Talk Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
Berkeley Breathed
Some of the stuff missing a source can be found on the site below, but it needs to be reworded as it rises to plagarism right now.
http://www.berkeleybreathed.com/pages/About.asp
--Beth Wellington (talk) 04:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. I chose to write you because on the discussion page, yours was the entry most closely concerned with the issue. Beth wishes for the new year. --Beth Wellington (talk) 04:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
T:DYK.
No problem. Interesting incident that happened there. :P · AndonicO 08:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Assistance request
On an RfA, this comment was made. I realize this is an ArbCom issue, but I felt it should be deleted as a legal threat. Should I ever become an admin, I'd like to know your opinion on whether it should be deleted under WP:NPA. My opinion, yes. — BQZip01 — 03:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)