| Revision as of 15:25, 24 January 2008 editMangojuice (talk | contribs)19,969 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:09, 24 January 2008 edit undoRaul654 (talk | contribs)70,896 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :::] (]) 11:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | :::] (]) 11:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Ok, Raul should be able to verify that and will probably unblock you when he responds. ]]<sup>]</sup> 15:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | ::::Ok, Raul should be able to verify that and will probably unblock you when he responds. ]]<sup>]</sup> 15:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Lomcevak has edited from only one IP, and it's *riddled* with Tilejoin socks (I caught a half-dozen more while I was looking into this unblock request). Moreover, there is no way to distinguish this user from Tilejoin based on the technical evidence - he looks, in every technical way, like a Tilejoin sock. The IP evidence does suggest that it's a public computer though. I will hesitantly unblock, on the assumption that he is being honest in what he says. ] (]) 16:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:09, 24 January 2008
Lomcevak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I (Lomcevak) am not a "sock-puppet" of "Tile join" but a legitimate and constructive (I hope) Wikipedian. Thanks.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I (Lomcevak) am ''not'' a "sock-puppet" of "Tile join" but a legitimate and constructive (I hope) Wikipedian. Thanks. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I (Lomcevak) am ''not'' a "sock-puppet" of "Tile join" but a legitimate and constructive (I hope) Wikipedian. Thanks. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I (Lomcevak) am ''not'' a "sock-puppet" of "Tile join" but a legitimate and constructive (I hope) Wikipedian. Thanks. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Lomcevak (talk) 09:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- The user who blocked you, Raul654, is a checkuser and is very likely to have evidence that you and Tile join edited from the same or similar IPs. I have asked him to come and check over it but I will not unblock you myself. Stifle (talk) 10:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, quite possibly the same IP. I work from my local library, right now, being 'between' personal kit and, of course, the facilities are public. Best I can say is look at the (few) contributions I (Lomcevak) have made. Again, thanks.
- Lomcevak (talk) 11:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, Raul should be able to verify that and will probably unblock you when he responds. Mangojuice 15:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Lomcevak has edited from only one IP, and it's *riddled* with Tilejoin socks (I caught a half-dozen more while I was looking into this unblock request). Moreover, there is no way to distinguish this user from Tilejoin based on the technical evidence - he looks, in every technical way, like a Tilejoin sock. The IP evidence does suggest that it's a public computer though. I will hesitantly unblock, on the assumption that he is being honest in what he says. Raul654 (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Category: