Misplaced Pages

User talk:Igorberger: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:13, 28 January 2008 editIgorberger (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,190 edits January 2008← Previous edit Revision as of 08:34, 28 January 2008 edit undoIgorberger (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,190 edits WP:NOTNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
:::You do not own the article and I am not a vandal but an editor. You have violated 3RR and I am reporting you. ] (]) 16:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC) :::You do not own the article and I am not a vandal but an editor. You have violated 3RR and I am reporting you. ] (]) 16:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
::::You are also ] your talk page for social engineering ] (]) 16:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC) ::::You are also ] your talk page for social engineering ] (]) 16:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
*I have asked ] to investigate.
:*He replied. " That sounds like a ] video to me."
::*I replied, "It is not a fringe video because later I realized the reporters story, "How Bush's gradfther helped Hitler raise to power http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/article/0,,1312542,00.html already incorporated in the article ] ]. Also the editor waring with me had no reason to thow templates at my talk page and call me a vandal. I am an editor as well. And he did not respect the 3RR." ] (]) 08:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
*I was not using ] as a ] but wanting to bring new notablity to the article with the video link, but later I descovered the news story has been incorporated into ] article already. ] (]) 08:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


== January 2008 == == January 2008 ==

Revision as of 08:34, 28 January 2008

Vandalism information
Severe
High
Elevated
Guarded
Low
3.08 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot
edit

Talk Archives


WP:NOT

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Prescott Bush for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you.--Veritas (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Prescott Bush support for Hitler and anti FDR is notable. This video shows the notability. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnAUQeHykXY
Instead of just using templates, I'll add that your continuous reversions are disruptive as they clearly violate WP:NOT#FORUM. Article talk pages are not a forum for posting videos or chatting on the general subject matter of the individual concerned in the article. Rather, article talk pages are for the discussion of article edits only. --Veritas (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
I am not chating about Prescott Bush but the video is by a journalist about Bush's connection to Hitler and FDR. Igor Berger (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
You are using the forum to post a video, not to discuss article edits. WP:NOT#FORUM clearly states, "talk pages exist for the purpose of discussing how to improve articles; they are not mere general discussion pages about the subject of the article, nor are they a helpdesk for obtaining instructions or technical assistance." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veritas (talkcontribs) 16:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Prescott Bush for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Veritas (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

You do not own the article or are you a boss of WikiPedia. I reverted 3 times and you reverted 3 times. If you revert one more time you will be violating the WP:3RR Igor Berger (talk) 16:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Note that 3RR makes an exception for the reversion of obvious vandalism. I have already pointed out to you how your edits are obviously violating Wiki policy. Please cease now. --Veritas (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
You do not own the article and I am not a vandal but an editor. You have violated 3RR and I am reporting you. Igor Berger (talk) 16:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
You are also WP:Refactor your talk page for social engineering refactoring Igor Berger (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • He replied. " That sounds like a fringe video to me."

January 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for You have been warned repeatedly to cease your disruptive style of editing. Your return to legitimate warnings is to put false and accusatory warnings on the pages of those editors so pointing you to correct and proper policy and guidelines as you did here. You have been previously warned that such disruptive editing is provocative and disruptive. I am blocking you for a period so that you cease these activities. Please cool off and spend some time reading the policies and guidelines rather than using pointy wiki-lawyering in your rebuttal comments when you return.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS 22:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Igorberger (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This Block was not merited being that the situation was already resolved!

Decline reason:

It would not appear so, looking at the contribs history, your repeated attempts to use the talk page as a forum, and then your bogus NPA warning against Veritas does not show a good-faith attempt to work within the bounds of Misplaced Pages guidelines and policies. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 06:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.