| Revision as of 17:24, 29 January 2008 editTony Fox (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,644 edits →==Deletion Review for Sigrid Regina Trarbach-Nazario==: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:04, 30 January 2008 edit undoNathan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,146 edits addNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ''(moved from talk page, as per user request)'' | ''(moved from talk page, as per user request)'' | ||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. {{unsigned|Billn4q2}} | An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. {{unsigned|Billn4q2}} | ||
| ==please don't threaten== | |||
| Misplaced Pages is not in any need of people coming here to pursue crusades or ideological agendas. If you carry on as you are, then your editing career may be short and turbulent. | |||
| I am not on a crusade. The article in question is so poorly written and an attack piece. A neutrally worded one would state the facts and state the controversy, that's all. An attack piece keeps on going on saying how bad the film is. I am firmly against what you call POV. I am for NPOV. NPOV is NOT blind support of the film. ] (]) 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:04, 30 January 2008
A temporary subpage for Misplaced Pages stuff.
Phantorg.net links
When you get a chance, can you take a look at this? This isn't earth-shatteringly important but I would like this resolved in the case of my, IMO weak, conflict of interest here. Graham87 15:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
My Rfa
I wish to thank you for being supportive of my effort to regain my adminship. Though it was not successful, your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 06:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Yamashita's gold
Why are you deleting referenced material? Grant | Talk 09:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- For the reason stated on the talk page: the reference is inadequate. Guy (Help!) 09:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
==Deletion Review for Sigrid Regina Trarbach-Nazario==
(moved from talk page, as per user request) An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sigrid Regina Trarbach-Nazario. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billn4q2 (talk • contribs)
please don't threaten
Misplaced Pages is not in any need of people coming here to pursue crusades or ideological agendas. If you carry on as you are, then your editing career may be short and turbulent.
I am not on a crusade. The article in question is so poorly written and an attack piece. A neutrally worded one would state the facts and state the controversy, that's all. An attack piece keeps on going on saying how bad the film is. I am firmly against what you call POV. I am for NPOV. NPOV is NOT blind support of the film. Fairchoice (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)