| Revision as of 09:03, 24 January 2008 editAlice (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,878 edits →Congratulations!: better link← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:58, 31 January 2008 edit undoOrderinchaos (talk | contribs)Administrators70,076 edits →Topic ban: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| :Congrats on your promotion too. Come back after you settle down, meanwhile I'll take care of the portal. Take care and good luck! ] (]) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | :Congrats on your promotion too. Come back after you settle down, meanwhile I'll take care of the portal. Take care and good luck! ] (]) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Topic ban == | |||
| Per the community discussion at ], because of disruption in these areas, you have been banned from editing pages regarding to Misplaced Pages's administration, granting and review of Featured Articles and Good Articles - specifically, ], ], ], ] and ] and subpages thereof. Any administrator can enact a 24-hour block of your account if the terms of the topic ban are violated. If you wish to nominate one of your own pages for Featured Article status, any user who is in good standing - for example, a representative of the WikiProject to which the article belongs - can do this on your behalf. ] 06:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:58, 31 January 2008
R E T I R E D
Macau FAR
I appreciate your efforts and various contributions to Macau-related articles. But can you leave the Macau FAR thing to me? It's quite difficult for me to address the reviewers' concerns while you're arguing with them. I know you have put a lot of time on improving the article and you might feel emotionally attached to it. But they are just trying to provide some comments, please don't take them too personally. Josuechan (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- oh you stalker! Lol. Ming is my favorite dynasty and currently I'm not entirely happy with that article... I guess Negraal is just enjoying his weekend and he might come back next week. Anyway, as I understand the FAC rules, people who vote "oppose" have to give very specific problems that can in principle be addressed. Or they will be ignored. I'll add a brief section/paragraph on transportation and we should be fine. Josuechan (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
About an external link
Thank you for your understanding. Hopefully the article can make it to FA this time.
I have a little favor to ask. Can you keep an eye on the user Sam777g777? He kept on adding the link Macao Tourism which has little information on various Macau-related articles. I already reverted 3 of her/his edits so far. Josuechan (talk) 04:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sure!!! Coloane (talk) 04:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of France
The article France you nominated as a good article has failed 
, see Talk:France for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Cheers, CP 00:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Hong Kong
Hi there Coloane, seeing as no one was polite enough to explain to you, "closing" in the sense of a featured portal candidate is the end process whereby a decision is made about whether or not there is consensus to promote. So no need to worry, your nomination will get as equal a chance as the others! Hope that clears things up for you :) Seaserpent 11:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
U2 FAC...
Coloane, I have replied to your two points on the FAC. Could you please review my response, and respond in turn. kind regards --Merbabu (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest that you had better save your time and keep from writing me. Just to remind you it is simply a beginning. We will surely have more chances to meet each other on the page of FAC!! Good Luck! Coloane (talk) 06:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Coloane. I have decided to treat your FAC review in good faith although i know it is not a coincidence. And I have done so politely and civilly even though personally, I don't believe they are valid criticisms. I know you remember me, and your comment above tells me quite a lot. Please review FAC's properly - if you make threats ("Just to remind you it is simply a beginning"), or take revenge on FAC pages, then I will seek administrator assistance. --Merbabu (talk) 07:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Concern
Coloane, I came across your comments on the U2 FAC then saw the comments here between you and User:Merbabu, so I had a look thru your recent contributions. I see that you initially were unhappy with an editors comments during the Macau FAC, this was enough that you nominated the article Indonesia for FAR at which time you came into contact with Merbabu. His assessment that the FAR was a bad faith or point nomination due to the prior Macau FAC was reasonable(though maybe a little heavy) given that there were no issues with the Indonesian article. Then we come to the U2 FAC where you request that rumours be included in the article and clarification over Human rights. When these were explained as already addressed(Human rights) or unverifiable by reliable sources(nobel prize rumours) you responded with a general comment that cant be addressed. Another editor asked you clarify the issues and you say it has nothing to do with them(on this Misplaced Pages is a collaborative effort anyone can edit and as such address concerns) and only to do with the nominator.
From all of this I am concerned that you are too emotionally involved to be productive in your actions and comments. What I suggest is that before you get any warnings about WP:CIVILITY WP:POINT or WP:NPA, you can break this downward spiral and disengage from further discussions with Merbabu. If you cant do this by editing other articles maybe you could take a few days off wiki and enjoy the outside world. Gnangarra 15:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- An WP:ANI discussion relating to these matters has been initiated. You may want to comment there as needed. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
PISA
ha ha i was right and you werent. i bet you wish you were as cleaver as me. im afraid you never will be youo are just a pathetic ignorant idiot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.154.24.147 (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above IP address, 59.154.24.147, has been warned against making personal attacks. If it continues, please let me know. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 13:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations!
Congratulations on your recent promotion and best wishes for your future endeavours! Alice 00:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Congrats on your promotion too. Come back after you settle down, meanwhile I'll take care of the portal. Take care and good luck! Josuechan (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Topic ban
Per the community discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive359#Coloane_community_ban_discussion, because of disruption in these areas, you have been banned from editing pages regarding to Misplaced Pages's administration, granting and review of Featured Articles and Good Articles - specifically, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:FARC, WP:GAC and WP:GA/R and subpages thereof. Any administrator can enact a 24-hour block of your account if the terms of the topic ban are violated. If you wish to nominate one of your own pages for Featured Article status, any user who is in good standing - for example, a representative of the WikiProject to which the article belongs - can do this on your behalf. Orderinchaos 06:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)