| Revision as of 13:20, 1 February 2008 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to User talk:Infophile/Archive 1.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:16, 2 February 2008 edit undoGeorgewilliamherbert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,680 edits →Article-banned from Talk:Homeopathy for 24 hrs for incivility: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| Ha! . — ] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"></sub></small>]]</span> 18:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | Ha! . — ] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA"></sub></small>]]</span> 18:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Article-banned from ] for 24 hrs for incivility == | |||
| Hi there. Your comment here: ... was rude, uncivil, and disruptive of discussions on ]. As the article is under community article probation, I am imposing a 24 hr article ban for you participating on ] and will log this on the probation page ]. ] (]) 05:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:16, 2 February 2008
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" |- |This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived to User talk:Infophile/Archive 1. |- |}
A quick note: I have a debating style that many find odd, as I usually try not to commit myself to a position until all the arguments are played out. This means that I'll often state arguments from both sides of a debate on different occasions, simply because I believe the arguments themselves have merit and should be made. If you stick to discussing the arguments themselves we'll have no problem, but if you try to assign a position to me, you might end up quite confused.
"Ours is not to question why, ours is but to report what reliable sources say on the matter." - First said here, but good for a reminder to myself and others.
AfD nomination of Quackery
An article that you have been involved in editing, Quackery, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Quackery. Thank you. —Whig (talk) 19:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Moved from Talk:Quackery
Please give me some time to review the new source you have added. I also ask you to remove the sources that you now agree are not reliable sources for this statement. —Whig (talk) 05:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I hope.....
.... this edit was OK with you. David D. (Talk) 03:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Take a look here
Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Misplaced Pages, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.
The bureaucracy should either take corrective steps to fix this situation, or else suffer the eventual loss of huge amounts of valuable talent and volunteered resources.
If you agree with this statement, post it to your pages, and pass it on. (discuss this here)
--Filll (talk) 14:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
semi-protection
Ha! You beat me to it. — Ƶ§œš¹ 18:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Article-banned from Talk:Homeopathy for 24 hrs for incivility
Hi there. Your comment here: ... was rude, uncivil, and disruptive of discussions on Talk:Homeopathy. As the article is under community article probation, I am imposing a 24 hr article ban for you participating on Talk:Homeopathy and will log this on the probation page Talk:Homeopathy/Article probation#Log of blocks and bans. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)