Misplaced Pages

User talk:Optimus91: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:33, 7 February 2008 editKbdank71 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users126,447 edits Unblock: Indef block without even a warning seems pretty harsh.← Previous edit Revision as of 20:22, 7 February 2008 edit undoThe Evil Spartan (talk | contribs)Rollbackers16,194 edits Unblock: RyulongNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:


Indef block without even a warning seems pretty harsh. --] 19:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Indef block without even a warning seems pretty harsh. --] 19:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
:The reason you've been blocked is because you had the gall to edit the same articles as Ryulong. Pity the newbie fool who tries such a venture. ] (]) 20:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:22, 7 February 2008

Den-O episodes

Do not change the titles of the episodes on Misplaced Pages to match the translations of others. The translations are those that are given through Japanese sources, or the best translation that makes sense. Also, the exclamation points are unnecessary, as they never appeared in several titles.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Optimus91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know why I've been blocked!

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't know why I've been blocked! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't know why I've been blocked! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't know why I've been blocked! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}


I have asked the blocking admin for his input. Woody (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

As have I. We should wait to hear from the admin who blocked you before acting further on this. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 16:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Looking at the contributions many of the edits appear to involve loading non-free images, and not including a fair use rationale. Addhoc (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Indef block without even a warning seems pretty harsh. --Kbdank71 19:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The reason you've been blocked is because you had the gall to edit the same articles as Ryulong. Pity the newbie fool who tries such a venture. The Evil Spartan (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:Optimus91: Difference between revisions Add topic