| Revision as of 04:16, 10 February 2008 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,242 edits →The current text of the Naveen Jain article was approved at WP:COIN: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:55, 10 February 2008 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,242 edits →3RR warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| The ] article has been the subject of ] at the ]. A single anonymous editor who tries to undo a verdict reached at that noticeboard is unlikely to be successful. To ensure that other editors respect consensus, administrators are allowed to use blocks or article protection. If you believe the article contains errors, explain what they are, and provide sources. ] (]) 04:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | The ] article has been the subject of ] at the ]. A single anonymous editor who tries to undo a verdict reached at that noticeboard is unlikely to be successful. To ensure that other editors respect consensus, administrators are allowed to use blocks or article protection. If you believe the article contains errors, explain what they are, and provide sources. ] (]) 04:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR warning == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Naveen Jain|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 23:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:55, 10 February 2008
 Welcome!Last edited:Last edited by:23:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC) EdJohnston (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
November 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Nelson DeMille, you will be blocked from editing. Nobody of consequence 14:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Naveen Jain. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Using false edit summaries does not let you sidestep the definition of vandalism or POV pushing. If you have an issue with the content in the article, comment on the talk page. Further removal of content may result in your being blocked from editing. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The current text of the Naveen Jain article was approved at WP:COIN
The Naveen Jain article has been the subject of a case at the Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. A single anonymous editor who tries to undo a verdict reached at that noticeboard is unlikely to be successful. To ensure that other editors respect consensus, administrators are allowed to use blocks or article protection. If you believe the article contains errors, explain what they are, and provide sources. EdJohnston (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naveen Jain. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. EdJohnston (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)