Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:25, 11 February 2008

This user is a member of WikiProject Firearms.

This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Misplaced Pages.

US Subs

You quoted Hazegray.org when claiming the US has no more than 5 non-nuclear subs. Instead of just listing the number, I'd suggest adding this as a source to accompany the US' nuclear subs source.--DMCer™ 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, actually, but it's hard to tell which of the other countries' subs are used for research/rescue, and which are used for military. Except maybe in the case of N. Korea, which I'm sure doesn't sure the 20 subs they have listed here for rescue/research missions, considering they have not nuclear technology employed yet.--DMCer™ 02:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Fort Myers, Florida

Thank you for dealing with that horrible trivia section. I discovered this article yesterday when reverting vandalism, and realized it needed a good deal of love. It was on my mental list of things to fix, but it looks like you are working on the worst of the problems. Gracias. Horologium (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

De nada. I live here too. I just want people to know a little about it. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 19:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Alan Keyes

I put Alan Keyes into a saparate section. Do you really think he deserves to be next to the other three? Do you know that there are dozens of candidates seeking Republican nomination? Do you want to include them all, including a picture? Or what do you want? CuriousOliver (talk) 22:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, he should be there. He meets every criteria. He simply hasn't done well. But, unlike the other candidates who are on ballots in only one or two states, he is on 25 (that's half) and has already received thousands of votes. The man doesn't have a chance in hell, but your obsession with burying him is simply getting silly. You said he got "zero, I repeat zero votes", but were wrong. Claims have been made that he never declared candidacy, but he did in Sept. 2007. He is on half the ballots across the country, still making appearences and still is tracking at 2% in Gallup polls. Pretty interesting number for a guy who has raised almost no funds, especially compared to Paul who has raised millions and isn't doing that much better. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

BTW, new stuff goes at the bottom, not the top of a page, over the users materials. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:3RR

Just wanted to alert you that you've violated 3RR (as has User:CuriousOliver on United States Presidential election, 2008. I won't block you at this point, but revert again and I will. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 23:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)