Misplaced Pages

Jewish lobby: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:28, 10 February 2008 editCasualObserver'48 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,268 editsm →Usage: added date and event← Previous edit Revision as of 02:57, 13 February 2008 edit undoJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits clean up irrelevant material and OR again, move material to correct place againNext edit →
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
In relation to the ], the phrase is sometimes used to refer loosely to ] - in this context ] defines it as "A conglomeration of approximately thirty-four Jewish political organizations in the United States which make joint and separate efforts to lobby for their interests in the United States, as well as for the interests of the ]."<ref name=Raymond/> In relation to the ], the phrase is sometimes used to refer loosely to ] - in this context ] defines it as "A conglomeration of approximately thirty-four Jewish political organizations in the United States which make joint and separate efforts to lobby for their interests in the United States, as well as for the interests of the ]."<ref name=Raymond/>
⚫ The validity of the term Jewish Lobby is disputed by a number of commentators and on several grounds. Some state that, when referring to American groups, it is an inaccurate label for a political coalition that doesn't represent most ] and includes many non-Jews, and whose primary concern is policy towards Israel.<ref name=Bard/><ref name="MearsheimerWalt">] and ]. , '']'', Book World Live, October 9, 2007. Accessed January 7, 2008.</ref> Others argue that the term is ] when used to attribute a manipulative and all-powerful character to Jews.<ref>]. , ], June 10, 2005:<blockquote>"Much like the situation across the Muslim world, there exists in the West today a discourse which is anti-Semitic, seeking legitimacy in certain Islamic texts and support in the present situation in Palestine. This is the attitude of not only the marginalized youth but also of intellectuals and Imams, who see the manipulative hand of the “Jewish lobby” at each turn or every political setback."</blockquote></ref><ref name=Jacobs>Jacobs, Dr. Susan. Paper presented at the 2005 CRONEM (Centre for Research on Nationalism, Ethnicity and Multiculturalism) Conference, ], Southlands College, 14th-15th June 2005:<blockquote>"As is well-known, the Procotols was a forged document written in Russia in 1897, alleging that a worldwide Jewish conspiracy existed. This document attempted to explain a seeming contradiction: Jews were (are) prominent both in capitalist and in socialist/communist circles: the ‘explanation’ was that both were shams: capitalist and communist Jews were not really at odds, as it might seem. They were in fact united (secretly) in a bid for world domination. Although this conspiracy theory lay at the heart of Nazism it is also widespread outside neo-fascist groupings. Many of these are right-wing/neo-Nazi (e.g. Pamyat in Russia) but the Protocols have had some influence on movements with some claim to progressive credentials. The Protocols have also had some influence elsewhere, so that Eyptian and Syrian state-sponsored TV serials have produced soaps which dramatise the allegations of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Mohamed, 2002; Kaba and Tubiana, 2002).<br>
The validity of the term Jewish Lobby is disputed by a number of commentators and on several grounds. Its disputed validity is highlighted by Tivnan in 1988, when he states, in the preface to his book, ‘The Lobby.’ ’The answers were not as obvious as either the critics or fans of the Jewish lobby would have it… Indeed, how the Jewish lobby had become primarily a pro-Israel lobby, one so aggressive, omnipresent and influential on matters relating to the Middle East that the denizens of Capital Hill refer to it simply as “the lobby,”…’ <ref>Edward Tivnan. ''The Lobby: Jewish Political Power and American Foreign Policy''. Touchstone Books, 1988. ISBN 0671668285. Preface, p8.</ref> Some later claim that, when referring to American groups, it is an inaccurate label for a political coalition that doesn't represent most ] and includes many non-Jews, and whose primary concern is policy towards Israel.<ref name=Bard/><ref name="MearsheimerWalt">] and ]. , '']'', Book World Live, October 9, 2007. Accessed January 7, 2008.</ref>

⚫ Others argue that the term is ] when used to attribute a manipulative and all-powerful character to Jews.<ref>]. , ], June 10, 2005:<blockquote>"Much like the situation across the Muslim world, there exists in the West today a discourse which is anti-Semitic, seeking legitimacy in certain Islamic texts and support in the present situation in Palestine. This is the attitude of not only the marginalized youth but also of intellectuals and Imams, who see the manipulative hand of the “Jewish lobby” at each turn or every political setback."</blockquote></ref><ref name=Jacobs>Jacobs, Dr. Susan. Paper presented at the 2005 CRONEM (Centre for Research on Nationalism, Ethnicity and Multiculturalism) Conference, ], Southlands College, 14th-15th June 2005:<blockquote>"As is well-known, the Procotols was a forged document written in Russia in 1897, alleging that a worldwide Jewish conspiracy existed. This document attempted to explain a seeming contradiction: Jews were (are) prominent both in capitalist and in socialist/communist circles: the ‘explanation’ was that both were shams: capitalist and communist Jews were not really at odds, as it might seem. They were in fact united (secretly) in a bid for world domination. Although this conspiracy theory lay at the heart of Nazism it is also widespread outside neo-fascist groupings. Many of these are right-wing/neo-Nazi (e.g. Pamyat in Russia) but the Protocols have had some influence on movements with some claim to progressive credentials. The Protocols have also had some influence elsewhere, so that Eyptian and Syrian state-sponsored TV serials have produced soaps which dramatise the allegations of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Mohamed, 2002; Kaba and Tubiana, 2002).<br>
That some type of shadowy Jewish conspiracy exists is commonsense, taken-for-granted element in many quarters: e.g. rumours that the predominance of neo-conservatives in the USA is a ‘Jewish conspiracy’ (Greenspan, 2003; Berlet, 2004; Interview, 2004 ). Perhaps even more common is a vague suspicion that such a conspiracy might exist but that it is impolite to articulate this. A contemporary form of this fear is the phrase ‘the Jewish lobby’ without mentioning other ‘lobbies’ or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine."</blockquote></ref><ref name=Klug/Wistrich>] & ] , International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism, ]. Retrieved January 11, 2008:<blockquote>"Does he or she rely on classic anti-Semitic stereotypes in so doing: for example, by dredging up the alleged Jewish/Zionist 'conspiracy' to dominate the world, or by evoking Jewish/Israeli 'warmongers' who supposedly run American foreign policy; or through referring to an all-powerful "Jewish Lobby" that prevents justice in the Middle East."</blockquote></ref><ref name=Vidal>Vidal, Dominique. "France: racism is indivisible", '']'', May 2004.</ref> That some type of shadowy Jewish conspiracy exists is commonsense, taken-for-granted element in many quarters: e.g. rumours that the predominance of neo-conservatives in the USA is a ‘Jewish conspiracy’ (Greenspan, 2003; Berlet, 2004; Interview, 2004 ). Perhaps even more common is a vague suspicion that such a conspiracy might exist but that it is impolite to articulate this. A contemporary form of this fear is the phrase ‘the Jewish lobby’ without mentioning other ‘lobbies’ or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine."</blockquote></ref><ref name=Klug/Wistrich>] & ] , International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism, ]. Retrieved January 11, 2008:<blockquote>"Does he or she rely on classic anti-Semitic stereotypes in so doing: for example, by dredging up the alleged Jewish/Zionist 'conspiracy' to dominate the world, or by evoking Jewish/Israeli 'warmongers' who supposedly run American foreign policy; or through referring to an all-powerful "Jewish Lobby" that prevents justice in the Middle East."</blockquote></ref><ref name=Vidal>Vidal, Dominique. "France: racism is indivisible", '']'', May 2004.</ref>

==History==
]

For centuries, a key element of antisemitic thought were ] that the Jews, as a group, were plotting to control or otherwise influence the world. Vijay Prasad described ''The myth of the "Jewish lobby"'' in India's magazine ''Frontline'':
<blockquote>
The idea of the "Jewish lobby" is attractive because it draws upon at least a few hundred years of anti-Semitic worry about an international conspiracy operated by Jewish financiers to defraud the European and American working poor of their livelihood. The "Jew," without a country, but with a bank, had no loyalty to the nation, no solidarity with fellow citizens. The anti-Semitic document, ''"],"'' is a good illustration of this idea. The ] stigmatized the "Jew" as the reason for poverty and exploitation, and obscured the role played by capitalism in the reproduction of grief. The six million Jews in the U.S. do not determine U.S. foreign policy; nor are they united. Jews in America, like other communities, are rent with division, not united behind one agenda.<ref name=Prasad>Prasad, Vijay. , ''Frontline'' (India's National Magazine) Volume 20 - Issue 20, September 27 - October 10, 2003.</ref>
</blockquote>


==Usage== ==Usage==
Author ] writes that the Jewish Lobby was thrust into prominence following the ]'s sharp shift of American policy towards significant military and foreign aid support for Israel following the ]. Goldberg notes that the Jewish Lobby predated the Nixon years by decades, playing a leadership role in formulating American policy on issues such as civil rights, separation of church and state, and immigration, guided by a liberalism that was a complex mixture of Jewish tradition, the experience of persecution, and self interest.<ref>Jonathan Jeremy Goldberg. ''Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment.'' Basic Books, 1996.</ref>{{citequote}}{{page number}} The late Jewish scholar ] writes that following the ], "he "Jewish lobby" was no longer spoken of in whispers, and its official leaders no longer pretended that they advanced their cause only by gentle persuasion."<ref>Arthur Hertzberg. ''Jewish Polemics''. Columbia University Press, 1992</ref>{{page number}} Author ] writes that in the United States the "Jewish Lobby" was thrust into prominence following the ]'s sharp shift of American policy towards significant military and foreign aid support for Israel following the ]. Goldberg notes that the "Jewish Lobby" predated the Nixon years by decades, playing a leadership role in formulating American policy on issues such as civil rights, separation of church and state, and immigration, guided by a liberalism that was a complex mixture of Jewish tradition, the experience of persecution, and self interest.<ref>Jonathan Jeremy Goldberg. ''Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment.'' Basic Books, 1996.</ref>{{citequote}}{{page number}} The late Jewish scholar ] writes that following the ], "he "Jewish lobby" was no longer spoken of in whispers, and its official leaders no longer pretended that they advanced their cause only by gentle persuasion."<ref>Arthur Hertzberg. ''Jewish Polemics''. Columbia University Press, 1992</ref>{{page number}} ] writes in his 1988 book ''The Lobby'' that the "Jewish lobby" in the United States "had become primarily a pro-Israel lobby, one so aggressive, omnipresent and influential on matters relating to the Middle East that the denizens of Capital Hill refer to it simply as “the lobby,”…" <ref>Edward Tivnan. ''The Lobby: Jewish Political Power and American Foreign Policy''. Touchstone Books, 1988. ISBN 0671668285. Preface, p8.</ref>


Susan Jacobs of ] states that the phrase, when used "without mentioning other ‘lobbies’ or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine", is a contemporary form of the fear of a ].<ref name=Jacobs/> ], of the International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism, ], sees reference to the phrase, when used to describe an "all-powerful 'Jewish Lobby'" that controls Middle Eastern policy, as reliance on a classic antisemitic stereotype.<ref name=Klug/Wistrich/> Dominique Vidal, writing in '']'', notes that in France, the term had been exclusively used by the French ] as "a phrase that combines standard anti-semitic fantasies about Jewish finance, media control and power; the term is the contemporary equivalent of ]," but that in 2004 it had been used by "a Jewish writer, ]".<ref name=Vidal/> Vidal noted that this usage was distinct from that in the United States, "where the self-described Jewish lobby is only one of many influence groups that have official standing with institutions and authorities.<ref name=Vidal/> ] detested the term, arguing "The self-importance of Jews combined with the paranoia of the anti-Semite had created the image of this lobby."<ref> Sutton, Nina (David Sharp trans.) ''Bettelheim: A Life and a Legacy'', BasicBooks, p. 486. ISBN 0465006353</ref> Susan Jacobs of ] states that the phrase, when used "without mentioning other ‘lobbies’ or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine", is a contemporary form of the fear of a ].<ref name=Jacobs/> ], of the International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism, ], sees reference to the phrase, when used to describe an "all-powerful 'Jewish Lobby'" that controls Middle Eastern policy, as reliance on a classic antisemitic stereotype.<ref name=Klug/Wistrich/> Dominique Vidal, writing in '']'', notes that in France, the term had been exclusively used by the French ] as "a phrase that combines standard anti-semitic fantasies about Jewish finance, media control and power; the term is the contemporary equivalent of ]," but that in 2004 it had been used by "a Jewish writer, ]".<ref name=Vidal/> Vidal noted that this usage was distinct from that in the United States, "where the self-described Jewish lobby is only one of many influence groups that have official standing with institutions and authorities.<ref name=Vidal/> ] detested the term, arguing "The self-importance of Jews combined with the paranoia of the anti-Semite had created the image of this lobby."<ref> Sutton, Nina (David Sharp trans.) ''Bettelheim: A Life and a Legacy'', BasicBooks, p. 486. ISBN 0465006353</ref>

Others also view the term as pejorative: Reviewing ]'s memoir ''Leap of Faith: Memoirs of an Unexpected Life'', Kenneth Jacobson of the ] writes that though she refers to the "Zionist lobby", "...Queen Noor is not so insensitive or crass as to actually use the phrase 'Jewish Lobby,'."<ref>Jacobson, Kenneth. , ], May 12, 2003.</ref> ], in a '']'' review of ]'s '']'' points out that Carter "doesn't resort to the term 'Jewish lobby'".<ref>]. , '']'', Volume 54, Number 5 · March 29, 2007.</ref>


According to ], director of the non-profit American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE), "...reference is often made to the 'Jewish lobby' in an effort to describe Jewish influence, but this term is both vague and inadequate." Bard argues the term ] is more accurate, because it is comprises both formal and informal elements (which includes public opinion), and "...because a large proportion of the lobby is made up of non-Jews."<ref name=Bard>]. ''The Water's Edge and Beyond: Defining the Limits to Domestic Influence on United States Middle East Policy'', Transaction publishers, 1991, p. 6. ISBN 088738286X</ref> According to ], director of the non-profit American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE), "...reference is often made to the 'Jewish lobby' in an effort to describe Jewish influence, but this term is both vague and inadequate." Bard argues the term ] is more accurate, because it is comprises both formal and informal elements (which includes public opinion), and "...because a large proportion of the lobby is made up of non-Jews."<ref name=Bard>]. ''The Water's Edge and Beyond: Defining the Limits to Domestic Influence on United States Middle East Policy'', Transaction publishers, 1991, p. 6. ISBN 088738286X</ref>


] and ], authors of ], discuss "Jewish Lobby" when they assert that "anyone who says there is an Israel lobby runs the risk of being charged with anti-Semitism, even though ] and the ] and the ] themselves refer to America’s ‘Jewish Lobby’".<ref name=W&M-p188>] and ]. ''The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,'' Farrah, Strauss and Giroux, 2007, p. 188.</ref> Walt comments, however, that he and co-author Mearsheimer "never use the term 'Jewish lobby' because the lobby is defined by its political agenda, not by religion or ethnicity."<ref name="MearsheimerWalt">] and ]. , '']'', Book World Live, October 9, 2007. Accessed January 7, 2008.</ref> In a letter to the editor of '']'', they state "Indeed, we explicitly rejected this label as inaccurate and misleading, both because the lobby includes non-Jews like the Christian Zionists and because many Jewish Americans do not support the hard-line policies favored by its most powerful elements."<ref>] and ]. , letters to the editor, October 14, 2007.</ref> ], commenting in '']'' on ] use of the term, states that "Mearsheimer and Walt would doubtless chide Dawkins for using the term 'Jewish lobby', which they studiously avoid in order to give no truck to anti-Jewish innuendo."<ref>]. , '']'', October 8, 2007.</ref> ] and ], authors of ], assert that "] and the ] and the ] themselves refer to America’s ‘Jewish Lobby’".<ref name=W&M-p188>] and ]. ''The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,'' Farrah, Strauss and Giroux, 2007, p. 188.</ref> Walt comments, however, that he and co-author Mearsheimer "never use the term 'Jewish lobby' because the lobby is defined by its political agenda, not by religion or ethnicity."<ref name="MearsheimerWalt">] and ]. , '']'', Book World Live, October 9, 2007. Accessed January 7, 2008.</ref> In a letter to the editor of '']'', they state "Indeed, we explicitly rejected this label as inaccurate and misleading, both because the lobby includes non-Jews like the Christian Zionists and because many Jewish Americans do not support the hard-line policies favored by its most powerful elements."<ref>] and ]. , letters to the editor, October 14, 2007.</ref> ], commenting in '']'' on ] use of the term, states that "Mearsheimer and Walt would doubtless chide Dawkins for using the term 'Jewish lobby', which they studiously avoid in order to give no truck to anti-Jewish innuendo."<ref>]. , '']'', October 8, 2007.</ref>


The B'nai Brith Anti-Defamation Commission of Australia defines the "Jewish lobby" as "an unwieldy group of individuals and organisations devoted to supporting the needs and interests of the Jewish community.". Retrieved February 2, 2008.</ref> Michael Visontay, editor of ]'s '']'', writes that "The way the phrase 'Jewish lobby has been bandied about in numerous letters implies there is something inherently sinister in ] when Jews do it."<ref>Visontay, Michael. , '']'', November 14, 2003.</ref> According to Geoffrey Brahm Levey and Philip Mendes, the term is used in Australia as a pejorative description of the way in which the Jewish community influences the Liberal Party "by talking to its leaders and making them aware of Jewish wishes and views".<ref>Geoffrey Brahm Levey, Philip Mendes. ''Jews and Australian Politics'', Sussex Academic Press, 2004, ISBN 1903900727, p. 91.</ref> The B'nai Brith Anti-Defamation Commission of Australia defines the "Jewish lobby" as "an unwieldy group of individuals and organisations devoted to supporting the needs and interests of the Jewish community.". Retrieved February 2, 2008.</ref> Michael Visontay, editor of ]'s '']'', writes that "The way the phrase 'Jewish lobby has been bandied about in numerous letters implies there is something inherently sinister in ] when Jews do it."<ref>Visontay, Michael. , '']'', November 14, 2003.</ref> According to Geoffrey Brahm Levey and Philip Mendes, the term is used in Australia as a pejorative description of the way in which the Jewish community influences the Liberal Party "by talking to its leaders and making them aware of Jewish wishes and views".<ref>Geoffrey Brahm Levey, Philip Mendes. ''Jews and Australian Politics'', Sussex Academic Press, 2004, ISBN 1903900727, p. 91.</ref>


] writes that in the ] "Jewish lobby" is used as an "even more pejorative" term for "the 'Israel lobby'".<ref>]. ''Safire's New Political Dictionary: The Definitive Guide to the New Language'', Random House, 1993, p. 120. ISBN 0679420681<blockquote>In Great Britain the "Israel lobby" is called, even more pejoratively, "the Jewish ] writes that in the ] "Jewish lobby" is used as an "even more pejorative" term for "the 'Israel lobby'".<ref>]. ''Safire's New Political Dictionary: The Definitive Guide to the New Language'', Random House, 1993, p. 120. ISBN 0679420681<blockquote>In Great Britain the "Israel lobby" is called, even more pejoratively, "the Jewish
lobby,"</blockquote></ref>{{Verify source|date=February 2008}} Safire is a former speechwriter for ], who, according to ], "delighted in telling associates and visitors that the 'Jewish lobby' had no effect on him."<ref>Quoted in: Daniel Pipes. </ref> Michael Lasky describes the term as an "unfortunate phrase", and "imagines" that ]'s use of it while writing about the "Nazi" films of ] was not intended pejoratively.<ref>Lasky, Melvin J. ''The Language of Journalism'', Transaction Publishers, 2000, p. 147. ISBN 0765800012</ref> Commenting on ], ] for the northwest of England's use of the term, '']'''s David Hirsh feels that the the manner in which Davies used the term indicates a lack of "care, thought" and "self-education," and compared Davies' rhetoric with the "care to avoid openly antisemitic rhetoric taken by sophisticates like Mearsheimer and Walt and ]." Davies resigned as leader of the Liberal Democrat group in the European Parliament after having used the term in an e-mail considered inappropriate by the public and the ].<ref>Hirsh, David. , '']'', May 5, 2006.</ref> lobby,"</blockquote></ref>{{Verify source|date=February 2008}} Safire is a former speechwriter for ], who, according to ], "delighted in telling associates and visitors that the 'Jewish lobby' had no effect on him."<ref>Quoted in: Daniel Pipes. </ref> Michael Lasky describes the term as an "unfortunate phrase", and "imagines" that ]'s use of it while writing about the "Nazi" films of ] was not intended pejoratively.<ref>Lasky, Melvin J. ''The Language of Journalism'', Transaction Publishers, 2000, p. 147. ISBN 0765800012</ref>

In 2006 ], ] for the northwest of England was forced to resign as leader of the ] group in the European Parliament<ref>Hirsh, David. , '']'', May 5, 2006.</ref> after writing to a constituent “I shall denounce the influence of the Jewish lobby that seems to have far too great a say over the political decision-making process in many countries.” In comments to ] he "confessed he didn’t know the difference between referring to the ‘pro Israel lobby’ and the ‘Jewish lobby’," and added “I’m quite prepared to accept that I don’t understand the semantics of some of these things.”<ref> Alex Sholem, , ], May 4, 2006.</ref> Commenting on Davies' use of the term, '']'''s David Hirsh writes Davies "has had to resign because his laudable instinct to side with the underdog was not tempered by care, thought or self-education." He compared Davies' rhetoric with the "care to avoid openly antisemitic rhetoric taken by sophisticates like Mearsheimer and Walt and ]."
{{USLobbies}} {{USLobbies}}


Revision as of 02:57, 13 February 2008

Part of a series on
Antisemitism
Definitions
Geography
Manifestations
Antisemitic tropes
Antisemitic publications
Persecution
Antisemitism on the Internet
Opposition
Category

Jewish lobby is a term used to describe or allege Jewish lobbying and influence in a number of areas, including politics, government, public policy, international relations, as well as business, international finance, the media, academia, and popular culture.

In relation to the United States, the phrase is sometimes used to refer loosely to various pro-Israel lobbying groups and individuals - in this context Walter John Raymond defines it as "A conglomeration of approximately thirty-four Jewish political organizations in the United States which make joint and separate efforts to lobby for their interests in the United States, as well as for the interests of the State of Israel."

The validity of the term Jewish Lobby is disputed by a number of commentators and on several grounds. Some state that, when referring to American groups, it is an inaccurate label for a political coalition that doesn't represent most American Jews and includes many non-Jews, and whose primary concern is policy towards Israel. Others argue that the term is antisemitic when used to attribute a manipulative and all-powerful character to Jews.

History

"US in the hands of the Jews". Antisemitic political cartoon in the 1896 US presidential election campaign.

For centuries, a key element of antisemitic thought were conspiracy theories that the Jews, as a group, were plotting to control or otherwise influence the world. Vijay Prasad described The myth of the "Jewish lobby" in India's magazine Frontline:

The idea of the "Jewish lobby" is attractive because it draws upon at least a few hundred years of anti-Semitic worry about an international conspiracy operated by Jewish financiers to defraud the European and American working poor of their livelihood. The "Jew," without a country, but with a bank, had no loyalty to the nation, no solidarity with fellow citizens. The anti-Semitic document, "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," is a good illustration of this idea. The Nazis stigmatized the "Jew" as the reason for poverty and exploitation, and obscured the role played by capitalism in the reproduction of grief. The six million Jews in the U.S. do not determine U.S. foreign policy; nor are they united. Jews in America, like other communities, are rent with division, not united behind one agenda.

Usage

Author J. J. Goldberg writes that in the United States the "Jewish Lobby" was thrust into prominence following the Nixon Administration's sharp shift of American policy towards significant military and foreign aid support for Israel following the 1973 war. Goldberg notes that the "Jewish Lobby" predated the Nixon years by decades, playing a leadership role in formulating American policy on issues such as civil rights, separation of church and state, and immigration, guided by a liberalism that was a complex mixture of Jewish tradition, the experience of persecution, and self interest. The late Jewish scholar Arthur Hertzberg writes that following the Six-Day War, "he "Jewish lobby" was no longer spoken of in whispers, and its official leaders no longer pretended that they advanced their cause only by gentle persuasion." Edward Tivnan writes in his 1988 book The Lobby that the "Jewish lobby" in the United States "had become primarily a pro-Israel lobby, one so aggressive, omnipresent and influential on matters relating to the Middle East that the denizens of Capital Hill refer to it simply as “the lobby,”…"

Susan Jacobs of Manchester Metropolitan University states that the phrase, when used "without mentioning other ‘lobbies’ or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine", is a contemporary form of the fear of a Jewish conspiracy. Robert S. Wistrich, of the International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, sees reference to the phrase, when used to describe an "all-powerful 'Jewish Lobby'" that controls Middle Eastern policy, as reliance on a classic antisemitic stereotype. Dominique Vidal, writing in Le Monde diplomatique, notes that in France, the term had been exclusively used by the French far right as "a phrase that combines standard anti-semitic fantasies about Jewish finance, media control and power; the term is the contemporary equivalent of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion," but that in 2004 it had been used by "a Jewish writer, Elisabeth Schemla". Vidal noted that this usage was distinct from that in the United States, "where the self-described Jewish lobby is only one of many influence groups that have official standing with institutions and authorities. Bruno Bettelheim detested the term, arguing "The self-importance of Jews combined with the paranoia of the anti-Semite had created the image of this lobby."

According to Mitchell Bard, director of the non-profit American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE), "...reference is often made to the 'Jewish lobby' in an effort to describe Jewish influence, but this term is both vague and inadequate." Bard argues the term Israel lobby is more accurate, because it is comprises both formal and informal elements (which includes public opinion), and "...because a large proportion of the lobby is made up of non-Jews."

Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, authors of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, assert that "AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents and the Israeli media themselves refer to America’s ‘Jewish Lobby’". Walt comments, however, that he and co-author Mearsheimer "never use the term 'Jewish lobby' because the lobby is defined by its political agenda, not by religion or ethnicity." In a letter to the editor of The New York Times, they state "Indeed, we explicitly rejected this label as inaccurate and misleading, both because the lobby includes non-Jews like the Christian Zionists and because many Jewish Americans do not support the hard-line policies favored by its most powerful elements." David Cesarani, commenting in The Guardian on Richard Dawkins use of the term, states that "Mearsheimer and Walt would doubtless chide Dawkins for using the term 'Jewish lobby', which they studiously avoid in order to give no truck to anti-Jewish innuendo."

The B'nai Brith Anti-Defamation Commission of Australia defines the "Jewish lobby" as "an unwieldy group of individuals and organisations devoted to supporting the needs and interests of the Jewish community.""The Media, Stereotypes and the Jewish Lobby". Retrieved February 2, 2008.</ref> Michael Visontay, editor of Australia's The Sydney Morning Herald, writes that "The way the phrase 'Jewish lobby has been bandied about in numerous letters implies there is something inherently sinister in lobbying when Jews do it." According to Geoffrey Brahm Levey and Philip Mendes, the term is used in Australia as a pejorative description of the way in which the Jewish community influences the Liberal Party "by talking to its leaders and making them aware of Jewish wishes and views".

William Safire writes that in the United Kingdom "Jewish lobby" is used as an "even more pejorative" term for "the 'Israel lobby'". Safire is a former speechwriter for Richard Nixon, who, according to Henry Kissinger, "delighted in telling associates and visitors that the 'Jewish lobby' had no effect on him." Michael Lasky describes the term as an "unfortunate phrase", and "imagines" that Alexander Walker's use of it while writing about the "Nazi" films of Leni Riefenstahl was not intended pejoratively.

In 2006 Chris Davies, MEP for the northwest of England was forced to resign as leader of the Liberal Democrats group in the European Parliament after writing to a constituent “I shall denounce the influence of the Jewish lobby that seems to have far too great a say over the political decision-making process in many countries.” In comments to TotallyJewish.Com he "confessed he didn’t know the difference between referring to the ‘pro Israel lobby’ and the ‘Jewish lobby’," and added “I’m quite prepared to accept that I don’t understand the semantics of some of these things.” Commenting on Davies' use of the term, The Guardian's David Hirsh writes Davies "has had to resign because his laudable instinct to side with the underdog was not tempered by care, thought or self-education." He compared Davies' rhetoric with the "care to avoid openly antisemitic rhetoric taken by sophisticates like Mearsheimer and Walt and Robert Fisk."

Lobbying in the United States
History
Topics
Major industrial and business lobbies
Major single-issue lobbies
Diaspora and ethnic lobbies
See also

See also

References

  1. ^ Walter John Raymond. The Dictionary of Politics: Selected American and Foreign Political and Legal Terms, Brunswick Publishing Corporation, 1992, p. 253.
  2. 'The Media, Stereotypes and the Jewish Lobby, the B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation Commission, Inc. (Australia).
  3. ^ Bard, Mitchell. The Water's Edge and Beyond: Defining the Limits to Domestic Influence on United States Middle East Policy, Transaction publishers, 1991, p. 6. ISBN 088738286X
  4. ^ Mearsheimer, John and Walt, Stephen. "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy", Washington Post, Book World Live, October 9, 2007. Accessed January 7, 2008.
  5. Ramadan, Tariq. "Muslims and Anti-Semitism", UN Chronicle, June 10, 2005:

    "Much like the situation across the Muslim world, there exists in the West today a discourse which is anti-Semitic, seeking legitimacy in certain Islamic texts and support in the present situation in Palestine. This is the attitude of not only the marginalized youth but also of intellectuals and Imams, who see the manipulative hand of the “Jewish lobby” at each turn or every political setback."

  6. ^ Jacobs, Dr. Susan. "AntiSemitism and other forms of racism Continuities, discontinuities, (and some conspiracies….)" Paper presented at the 2005 CRONEM (Centre for Research on Nationalism, Ethnicity and Multiculturalism) Conference, Roehampton University, Southlands College, 14th-15th June 2005:

    "As is well-known, the Procotols was a forged document written in Russia in 1897, alleging that a worldwide Jewish conspiracy existed. This document attempted to explain a seeming contradiction: Jews were (are) prominent both in capitalist and in socialist/communist circles: the ‘explanation’ was that both were shams: capitalist and communist Jews were not really at odds, as it might seem. They were in fact united (secretly) in a bid for world domination. Although this conspiracy theory lay at the heart of Nazism it is also widespread outside neo-fascist groupings. Many of these are right-wing/neo-Nazi (e.g. Pamyat in Russia) but the Protocols have had some influence on movements with some claim to progressive credentials. The Protocols have also had some influence elsewhere, so that Eyptian and Syrian state-sponsored TV serials have produced soaps which dramatise the allegations of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Mohamed, 2002; Kaba and Tubiana, 2002).
    That some type of shadowy Jewish conspiracy exists is commonsense, taken-for-granted element in many quarters: e.g. rumours that the predominance of neo-conservatives in the USA is a ‘Jewish conspiracy’ (Greenspan, 2003; Berlet, 2004; Interview, 2004 ). Perhaps even more common is a vague suspicion that such a conspiracy might exist but that it is impolite to articulate this. A contemporary form of this fear is the phrase ‘the Jewish lobby’ without mentioning other ‘lobbies’ or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine."

  7. ^ Klug, Brian & Wistrich, Robert S. "Correspondence between Prof. Robert Wistrich and Brian Klug: When Is Opposition to Israel and Its Policies Anti-Semitic?", International Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Retrieved January 11, 2008:

    "Does he or she rely on classic anti-Semitic stereotypes in so doing: for example, by dredging up the alleged Jewish/Zionist 'conspiracy' to dominate the world, or by evoking Jewish/Israeli 'warmongers' who supposedly run American foreign policy; or through referring to an all-powerful "Jewish Lobby" that prevents justice in the Middle East."

  8. ^ Vidal, Dominique. "France: racism is indivisible", Le Monde diplomatique, May 2004.
  9. Prasad, Vijay. The myth of the "Jewish lobby", Frontline (India's National Magazine) Volume 20 - Issue 20, September 27 - October 10, 2003.
  10. Jonathan Jeremy Goldberg. Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment. Basic Books, 1996.
  11. Arthur Hertzberg. Jewish Polemics. Columbia University Press, 1992
  12. Edward Tivnan. The Lobby: Jewish Political Power and American Foreign Policy. Touchstone Books, 1988. ISBN 0671668285. Preface, p8.
  13. Sutton, Nina (David Sharp trans.) Bettelheim: A Life and a Legacy, BasicBooks, p. 486. ISBN 0465006353
  14. Mearsheimer, John and Walt, Stephen. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, Farrah, Strauss and Giroux, 2007, p. 188.
  15. Mearsheimer, John and Walt, Stephen. "The Israel lobby", letters to the editor, October 14, 2007.
  16. Cesarani, David. "Exerting influence", The Guardian, October 8, 2007.
  17. Visontay, Michael. "Free speech for some, others pay", The Sydney Morning Herald, November 14, 2003.
  18. Geoffrey Brahm Levey, Philip Mendes. Jews and Australian Politics, Sussex Academic Press, 2004, ISBN 1903900727, p. 91.
  19. Safire, William. Safire's New Political Dictionary: The Definitive Guide to the New Language, Random House, 1993, p. 120. ISBN 0679420681

    In Great Britain the "Israel lobby" is called, even more pejoratively, "the Jewish lobby,"

  20. Quoted in: Daniel Pipes. Review of A. F. K. Organski, The $36 Billion Bargain: Strategy and Politics in U.S. Assistance to Israel.
  21. Lasky, Melvin J. The Language of Journalism, Transaction Publishers, 2000, p. 147. ISBN 0765800012
  22. Hirsh, David. "Revenge of the Jewish lobby?", The Guardian, May 5, 2006.
  23. Alex Sholem, MEP Disciplined Over Slur, TotallyJewish.Com, May 4, 2006.
Categories: