| Revision as of 17:55, 14 February 2008 editWobble (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,640 edits →Hi: are you trying to edit war?← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:00, 14 February 2008 edit undoLegalleft (talk | contribs)433 edits →your bias: LOLNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ==your bias== | ==your bias== | ||
| Please refrain from removing critiques of heritability from the "race and intelligence" article just because they contradict your personal "belief" (as you have expressed it). It is perfectly reasonable to have a discussion of gene-environment '''interactions''' in an article about "intelligence" and "race" esspecially as the article cvurrently erroneously assumes that these are independent variables. This is not "your" article and you are not acting in good faith and appear to understand nothing about neutrality, your edits have been one sided and enormously biased. ] (]) 17:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | Please refrain from removing critiques of heritability from the "race and intelligence" article just because they contradict your personal "belief" (as you have expressed it). It is perfectly reasonable to have a discussion of gene-environment '''interactions''' in an article about "intelligence" and "race" esspecially as the article cvurrently erroneously assumes that these are independent variables. This is not "your" article and you are not acting in good faith and appear to understand nothing about neutrality, your edits have been one sided and enormously biased. ] (]) 17:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :I would say exactly the same thing to you. I actually think everyone's POV is interesting and most are even plausible, but you clearly think that only one thing is true and worth mentioning. You may not realize it, but the text you added is somewhere between trivial true (and hence could simply be given in the definition of heritability) and irrelevant (as in not important to this issue). --] (]) 18:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:00, 14 February 2008
Welcome!
Hi Legalleft! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Alun (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Replied on my talk page to keep discussion in the same place. Alun (talk) 08:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
your bias
Please refrain from removing critiques of heritability from the "race and intelligence" article just because they contradict your personal "belief" (as you have expressed it). It is perfectly reasonable to have a discussion of gene-environment interactions in an article about "intelligence" and "race" esspecially as the article cvurrently erroneously assumes that these are independent variables. This is not "your" article and you are not acting in good faith and appear to understand nothing about neutrality, your edits have been one sided and enormously biased. Alun (talk) 17:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- I would say exactly the same thing to you. I actually think everyone's POV is interesting and most are even plausible, but you clearly think that only one thing is true and worth mentioning. You may not realize it, but the text you added is somewhere between trivial true (and hence could simply be given in the definition of heritability) and irrelevant (as in not important to this issue). --Legalleft (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)