Revision as of 08:43, 15 February 2008 editNouse4aname (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers29,706 edits Undid revision 191607627 by 86.134.94.232 (talk). Revert vandalism← Previous edit |
Revision as of 09:08, 15 February 2008 edit undo86.134.94.232 (talk) Well he is, you know.Next edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
==FASCIST== |
|
== A Dose of Rock 'n' Roll == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on ]. The reason is: |
|
|
:photo books not covered by ] |
|
|
{{{3|}}} |
|
|
For your information, ] ] 09:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Your RFR== |
|
|
Your request for Rollback has been modified, ] to see...--] ].] 12:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==]== |
|
|
I fixed the AfD formatting for you on this page. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 18:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Speedy deletion of ]== |
|
|
] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our ] as well as the ] for more information. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. <font color="1900FF" face="Vladimir Script">]</font> ''<small>(])</small>'' 20:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Keratoconus == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there. I have also noticed the edits on the C3R section in ], which have been going on for some time. I have tried getting the parties (I think there is more than one) to respond, but without success. Let's see if your message on the talk page produces results. Best regards, — ] <sup>]</sup> 18:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C3-R is the original and most commonly used term to describe collagen crosslinking. It was presented by Dr. Boxer Wachler at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting several years ago. Subsequent acronyms as CCL and CXL have recently been developed. Therefore, it is appropriate to include C3-R in the mileau. |
|
|
|
|
|
There are two types of techniques to perform CCL, CXL, and C3-R: without epithelium developed by the German group and with epithelium intact which was developed by Dr. Boxer Wachler. Therefore it is appropriate to cite Dr. Boxer Wachler is this regard. This does not constitute an advertisement, but references an important aspect of crosslinking and it factual, not hype. |
|
|
|
|
|
] <sup>]</sup> 20:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I moved the article to the proper name so that both would be picked up by the deleting admin. There was no need to nominate it for deletion manually. - <font face="Verdana">] <sub>]</sub></font> 19:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:As I said right above, the deleting admin would pick up the redirect (most usually do). Doing so leaves a good trail for possible future recreations of this article. - <font face="Verdana">] <sub>]</sub></font> 19:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Frost Fight == |
|
|
|
|
|
I responded on my ]. ]] 06:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Happy Valentine's Day! == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:pink; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] |
|
|
|
|
|
<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> is wishing you a ]! This greeting promotes ] and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <br /> |
|
|
|
|
|
Spread the love by adding {{]:]}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Jason Spevack == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from ], which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. ] is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{tl|prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on ]. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at ]. Thanks! <!-- ] -->. ] (]) 18:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Removed prod on ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from ], which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Misplaced Pages. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at ]. Thanks! <!-- ] --> -- ''']]''' 20:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re: Premature Valentine == |
|
|
|
|
|
Well, same thing as my Christmas greeting, which you probably didn't get. I just go around editing and send that to pretty much anyone that I see. And... I saw you. <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 18:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== hello == |
|
|
|
|
|
see repley from |
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:200.153.155.50&redirect=no |
|
|
at ]. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Keratoconus == |
|
|
|
|
|
Just dropping by to say I fully approve of the stance you are taking here, and your attempts to bring the parties to discussion. I'm keeping a close eye on things myself and won't hesitate to help bring this to a satisfactory conclusion. Regards, — ] <sup>]</sup> 23:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:. A shame really. I had requested a period of semi-protection for the article to see if that would induce him to create an account and bring him to the negotiating table, but it was declined, perhaps unsurprisingly, and he was blocked instead. — ] <sup>]</sup> 18:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Categories == |
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I've had a trawl through his talk page and archives. Even had a quick look at the admin notice board, and was tempted to post there too... Figured I might as well point out another occurrence of poor choice for categories. I spent ages back in December recategorising everything that was in ] and ]. It was in excess of 5,000 articles, of which I think 99% were recategorised properly, with maybe a handful that may find better cats in the future. As you said, what is the point in categorising an article when it will need to be redone later, and is also no longer listed in a convenient place to see that it needs a better category. Since everyone else can do it properly... hope this guy starts paying attention or something is done soon. Anyway, now I have ranted for ages and for no real reason I'll stop. Happy editing! ] (]) 16:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ARV == |
|
|
|
|
|
"I'd like to ask you to use the very process you've been running to undo all of the automated cleanup you've been doing" was . --] (]) 20:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:Are you going to leave me on the AIV? I thought we resolved that with the quote. Also, let me know if my message on the ANI is acceptable and if I can continue to revert my edits or not. --] (]) 20:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
|