Revision as of 15:52, 14 February 2008 editDelicious carbuncle (talk | contribs)21,054 edits →Category:American musical groups: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:49, 15 February 2008 edit undo86.134.94.232 (talk) Whoops.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Whoops. | |||
<div class="plainlinks" style="margin: 0.5em; border: 2px #80737C solid; background: #E0DAE9; padding: 1em;" > | |||
] | |||
Hi, and welcome to the ]! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to rugby union. | |||
A few features that you might find helpful: | |||
* Our ] points to most of the useful pages within the project. | |||
* The ] is updated very frequently. You can if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{tl|WPRU Announcements}} there. | |||
* Most important discussions take place on the project's ]; it is highly recommended that you . | |||
* The project has several departments, which handle ], ], and a ]. | |||
* We have a ] that focus on Fiji related rugby union articles. | |||
* Our ] has extensive lists of requested articles. | |||
* We've developed a ] for article structure and content, template use, categorisation, and other issues that you may find useful. | |||
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:small;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span> 15:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
''':Since you have done marvelous contributions to rugby, I would like you to part of our Wiki Project and I know you have been on Misplaced Pages for a long time so this is more of "join our group" then an actual welcome''' | |||
==Cardiff Blues== | |||
On the squad listing, I felt it appropriate to have both Australian and Welsh flags next to Luke Evans and Ben White. Both these players are Australians - but they have made themselves available to Wales. I thought it sensible to reflect this dual nationality. | |||
Do you disagree? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==The Classic Crime== | |||
Would you like to join the dissuction that we are having on the bands genre. we are trying to see if they are a christian band or not. and see if they are anymore genre besides ]. oh ya isnt the band an Indie Rock band. | |||
== Prod == | |||
I've removed the prod at ]. I disagreed with the reasoning. If you would like to pursue the issue further, you can list it at ]. Thanks. ]] 19:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Smash (song) == | |||
Upon first glance, it looked notable. Looking at it now, I don't think it is. If you'd like me to list it on AfD, I will for you. Sorry for the inconvenience. ]] 15:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Angels and Airwaves move== | |||
May I ask why you moved the Angels and Airwaves page to ] after it was just moved back by an administrator to the aforementioned location? Furthermore, why was the move not discussed in the talk page? | |||
] 14:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
:I got the title changed back to Angels '''and''' Airwaves after someone changed it to fit the official typeface. Please see ]. According to the history, after this movie (which was done by an administrator), you then moved the page to Angels '''&''' Airwaves. Why? | |||
: ] 14:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
::I believe you are mistaken. He was the admin who moved the page back to Angels and Airwaves -- he didn't use the official typeface. I think you mistakenly moved the page. | |||
:: ] 15:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
==towns== | |||
I know it sounds weird, but all towns and villages and other inhabited places are considered notable at WP as long as there is any information to show they exist, no matter how small. Consistently upheld at AfD, so no point nominating for deletion. ''']''' (]) 21:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Green Day == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Green Day/Invite}} | |||
== WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive == | |||
<div class="plainlinks" style="margin: 0.5em; border: 2px #80737C solid; background: #E0DAE9; padding: 1em;" > | |||
] For the ] ] is launching an '''Improvement Drive''' for national rugby union teams; specifically those participating in the Rugby World Cup. | |||
We need your help! Here is what you can do: | |||
* Adopt a national rugby union team article and collaborate with other members to improve it. | |||
* Find, create and upload free images that will help improve these articles. | |||
* Copy-edit, reference, and expand articles when and where you can. | |||
* Promote the project and encourage others to join. | |||
The World Cup is fast approaching and these articles are going to get a lot more hits during the tournament. It would be great if we could have them at a high standard! | |||
For more information see the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby union talk page ]. {{{1|}}} | |||
</div> ] <sup>]</sup> 05:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
==run-on teams== | |||
They are best placed on 2007 pages, please feel free to create one. There are many NRL and UK Super League ones out there for you to use as a template. ] 17:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Well done for making the effort to move all the things through to 2007 season pages. Will flesh the articles out to include signings, contract extensions, etc. Top effort though. ] 11:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Went through and fleshed them out from your initial efforts. ] 09:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
NRL ones have cited sources. They will be brought back to be retrospective. ] 13:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Batley Bulldogs 2007== | |||
A {{]}} template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice explains why (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{tl|db-author}}. <font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 18:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Fixed the 2007 page ] 21:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Panic! At the Disco Citations== | |||
Please stop removing citations needed for the articles ] and ], and please stop changing the format for the genre. Now first off you put a citation needed in the "The album is split in two, with tracks 1 through 7 featuring futuristic instruments such as ]s and ]s and tracks 9 through 13 using traditional instruments such as the ] and a ] piano. Track 8 serves as a link between the two halves, beginning with techno-style dance beats before switching to piano." part of the article which doasn't make sense because anyone whos ever heard the album would tell you that's exactly what it does, plus in the reviews they also mentions that this happens. Secondly on the "The album primarily deals with social issues that the band points on through various songs. Topics such as ], ], ], ], and ] are woven throughout the album. Guitarist ] also relates two of the songs to living with his alcoholic father" all you have to do is read the lyrics and it tells you this as well, and for the Ryan's alchoholic father part it tells you in the link that Nails For Breakfast, Tacks For Snacks and Camisado are both about Ryan's alchoholic father, or you can ask any serious fan of Panic! At the Disco. Thirdly for the "The first track, "Introduction", contains a sample of what appears to be a radio broadcast in ]. The speaker is saying "''...spotkało się z szerokim rozgłosem''", which means "''...gained significant popularity." part I speak Polish and have also had a friend from Poland state that this is true. We come back to how Nails For Breakfast, Tacks For Snacks and Camisado are about Ryan's father again which I've already explained is true. Now the last one that makes me happy is that you say that "Time to Dance" is entirely based on '']." needs a citation when in the link that states all the other songs references and meanings it states the EXACT same thing. So please leave Panic! At the Disco and A Fever You Can't Sweat Out alone when I delete the citations needed yet again otherwise I'll have to report you. ] 19:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
==2004 Warped Tour Compilation== | |||
Hello. I know we went back and forth a couple times on a track listing for the ] CD's. Could you take a look at the ] and let me know what you think? ] 06:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC) (Moved from user page ] 15:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)) | |||
==Lying Is The Most Fun A Girl Can Have Without Taking Her Clothes Off== | |||
Sorry Nouse4aname I was just trying to fix an error in the title of the article and the song name in general for wikipedia becase it really is supposed to be all capitals. ] 02:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Artist Genres == | |||
Thanks for the info. I just assumed that they were supposed to be separated by commas because in the sample infobox they are. <font color="darkred">]</font>] 13:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Appreciation== | |||
Hi there! I see your name all over the 'pedia and I thought I'd just say: great work! The work you do is really appreciated. | |||
] ] 14:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Lyrics== | |||
<s>Why the hell did you remove the lyrics from the Panic! at the Disco articles? They weren't ''not'' supposed to be there, were they? I thought they were a valuable addition to the article. If you screw around like that again I'm going to report you for vandalism. ] (]) 20:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)</s> | |||
:Hi there. Concerning the above user, I know that they have treated you unkindly, but he is a new user and we should extend our courtesy a lot further to new people because they don't know wiki policies. His attitude was unacceptable but it's up to us old hands to point out, kindly, where they're going wrong. | |||
:Best, ] ] 13:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::I have erased my message. I'm sorry about posting it. | |||
::I'm sorry for not controlling my temper. I'm sorry for the many uncivil messages on ] and ] as well as here. Again I'm very sorry ] (]) 16:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::and if you are interested in ], have you joined the Panic at the Disco Wikiproject? ] (]) 16:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
I'm sorry I didn't restrain myself on the ] page: I said "shit". I'm sorry. I used that word because two of the photos I posted for ] and ] were kept around, then abruptly deleted, as one had a copyright on it, and I don't know about the other picture. Sorry again, hope this doesn't happen any more. ] (]) 16:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Helpful Hint== | |||
As a warning, there is a user going around vandalising ] related pages, (which I know you edit frequently) such as ] (look for the '''latest''' contribution by ] in the history. He has also vandalised ] and ]] (]) 15:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
Thank you for your edits! Keep up the good work on the P!atD articles.] (]) 19:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC) ] has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
</div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
== Category suggestion == | |||
Hi. When you add a group to a more specific category, you should remove them from the more general parent categories. For example, if you add ], remove ] and ]. Thanks. — ] (] '''·''' ]) 02:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Speedies== | |||
Hi, I can't help but notice that a few of your nominations for speedy are inappropriate. Can you please consider either nominating things for AfD instead? It would be great if you could provide me a list of bands you're A7'ing, so I can rewrite/recreate anything that's deleted inappropriately (all too common with bands pages these days). ] (]) 11:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
:I added the chart hit line for ]; the Allmusic bio was linked at the bottom but nobody had added that information. My problem is, plenty of band articles get speedied unnecessarily, because no one bothers to check whether or not the band is actually notable before they tag it. Remember, what we should be looking for is not the ''current state of the page'', but the ''inherent notability of the subject'' - which was the case for Clare Quilty. Running a Google search or an Allmusic check before nominating a speedy would be a big help, and would probably save a lot of people's hard work from being deleted. Also, if you speedy something and it gets deleted (which can happen in a matter of minutes), I have no way of knowing that, so the edit summary you provide is moot. ] (]) 13:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Just a note - The fact that AfD takes five days shouldn't dissuade you from using it! Speedies involve only two people and are "hidden" once the article is deleted. AfD's are transparent and allow people to "rescue" articles that deal with notable subject but aren't currently up to snuff. Remember, whatever we delete is potentially of use to someone, and people should be given the chance to prove its worth. ] (]) 13:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::It's unfortunate that you are so nonchalant about this. Would you be willing to meet me halfway here? You are going through a large number of band articles, which is an area I edit heavily. Could you perhaps provide me a list of articles that look speedy-worthy, as you go through? If you could give me a day or two to go through them and save the salvageable ones, I'd really appreciate it; there's no hurry, and even if there were an extra day doesn't mean much. It would probably result in the betterment of a bunch of notable music articles, and after a day or two you can nuke off the ones that don't meet ]. But once they're gone, they're gone, and I can't even tell they're gone. ] (]) 14:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::Okay, thanks. I'll see if I can help you out; I try to put everything I come across into local categories by state or city. ] (]) 14:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Further note: I had to go to ] to get ] restored. Charting a hit makes a group notable. ] (]) 23:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Thanks; no objections on KUMA or VIH. ] (]) 12:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== The Working Man's Barnstar == | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Working {{#switch: {{{2}}} | |||
|w=Woman's | |||
|n=Wikipedian's | |||
|#default=Man's | |||
}} Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your refusal to give up on ]! •] <small>]</small> 12:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== Re:Apologize (song) == | |||
Hi. I've made a comment in the talk page and will keep watch of it for responses. I'm not impressed with that IP user's stubborn behaviour on this issue with many people disagree. ] (]) 09:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
==P!atD 08== | |||
I'm sure you have seen the new article for the upcoming Panic at the Disco album. Doesn't it seem strange that so many editors would go to the trouble of maintaining a page for an article that doesn't exist yet? I don't even think that article should exist until it has been released, don't you? ] (]) 00:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
* They removed the deletion tag! It's still mostly speculation... "Nine in the Afternoon" will most likely be the new single", though there are references. The other thing, they keep changing the info, first "Middle of Summer" and "Things Have Changed" are the same, then they are different songs. I don't know if you feel this way, but I'm getting sort of pissed off at ]. He's told us he's just siked for new music, but he's not paying to his mistakes. Also, he says he is maintaining the new album's page. Did he just declare that or did an administrator say he could? He can't even spell "grammar". Sorry if this is sounding like complaining. ] (]) 04:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
Hi Nouse, I just wanted to apologize for reverting your category thing on that page. I had tried to undo the edit I wanted reverted, but it wouldn't let me for some reason, so I just used the revert option. Thanks for not seeming to be mad about it. ] (]) 18:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Nine in the Afternoon== | |||
Can you please not put a proposed deletion tag on ]? It is going to be released in just maybe two weeks, and so I'd have to recreate that article. '''Respond on my talk page'''. Cheers, and keep up the good work. ] (]) 23:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== bond vs Bond == | |||
Hi. Considering that pretty much every reference to do with "bond" has the lowercase "b" (for the reason mentioned in the article), shouldn't we honour that here? ~~ ]]<sup>]]</sup> 20:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
]An editor has nominated ], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]"). | |||
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Dirty Magic | ] | ] }} and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> ] (]) 13:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
==again, nine in the afternoon== | |||
This is getting on my nerves. People are going to want to delete the article if there's no release date for the song. I was also really looking forward to the music video, but that's not my point. Do you think this article will be deleted now that there isn't a specific release date? That's why the page was redirected last time. ] (]) 17:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:In response to the above IP address Yes I was worried about the same thing. I know that the music video hasn't been released, so it obviously wasn't released on the 1st, right. The website was supposedly hacked, which I can believe. Nouse4aname, do you think "You Don't Have To Worry" might be the album title? I'm betting on "Pretty Odd". ] (]) 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
==] has been superseded== | |||
]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|] (] '''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] has been superseded by a similar category (typos in name, expanding abbreviations, fixing capitalisation, renaming to comply with the "by country" format and conversions from singular to plural or vice versa). (]).<br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click ''' ] (]) 23:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Doppelganger? == | |||
Hi, are you and {{user|Nouseforaname312}} related? ](]) 13:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I just happened to notice the two names on my watchlist editing on related topics and it piqued my curiosity. (He made an edit to ] just a few hours before you did some trimming to ](]) 15:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Spaces after punctuation == | |||
Hi. Nouseforaname thankyou for the advice. As you can see, I'm trying to improve. Cheers ] (]) 11:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Moving from user page. ] (]) 12:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Musical groups== | |||
AWB only does CategoryA → CategoryB batch jobs; it really isn't very good at doing CategoryA → B-C-D-E-or-F jobs in one step. Sorting further into subcategories requires at least two separate AWB runs — it just can't be done that way in one batch. ] (]) 09:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Yes, I'll be doing that. ] (]) 09:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
: I've left behind exactly three articles that I wasn't sure what to do with, if you could take a look at those. ] (]) 09:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Heh, no worries. AWB really does make things a lot easier (especially when you get one of those 800+ categories that needs diffusion), but I can see how it might look like somebody's doing it wrong if you're not familiar with it. ] (]) 10:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
Hey, if you catch this fellow starting wars again, I'd say it'd be worth the while to report him to ]. Probably an open-and-shut case, considering the overlap in articles edited and the static IP from which he edits. ] (]) 18:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
Sorry my bad, im new at this! | |||
== ] == | |||
Please note: ] --<span style="background: white;">neon</span><span style="color:white; background: black;">white</span><small> ] ]</small> 17:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Considering the lead begins "This is a list of '''notable''' bands and musicians..." (emphasis added), then that immediately states that notability '''is''' a prequisite for that particular list. In addition, what use is there in having a red-link to a non-notable band? It provides little, if any information to a viewer. Furthermore, that link you provide in no way says that a list can include non-notable people or groups... ] (]) 08:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
:: Not having an article on wikipedia is not evidence that a band isn't notable. Take Einstein's Sister for example, they don't yet have an article but would likely be notable considering the sources available and Reggie and the full effect I object to the blanket removal of all red links, assuming they aren't notable. There are many lists on wikipedia that contain entries that don't have articles. --<span style="background: white;">neon</span><span style="color:white; background: black;">white</span><small> ] ]</small> 17:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
::: Perhaps not, but there is little point in having a red link in the list. It leads nowhere and thus serves no purpose. As articles are created they can easily be added in, but a list full of red links to bands that may not be notable is just asking for articles to be created that probably shouldn't be. ] (]) 17:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Category:American musical groups == | |||
You really ought to read what's on ]'s talk page already. ] (]) 15:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:49, 15 February 2008
Whoops.