| Revision as of 18:24, 15 February 2008 editSeminarist (talk | contribs)347 edits Reasons for revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:14, 15 February 2008 edit undoCebactokpatop (talk | contribs)252 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ] (]) 18:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | ] (]) 18:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ---- | |||
| =NPOV= | |||
| False accusations easily verifiable by looking at the latest revision of mine. This person is trying to quiet down the voice of the traditional Orthodox people who do not see the work of JZ as Orthodox. That is precisely what we call vandalism, and that is why you deserved tag - vandal. | |||
| ] (]) 20:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:14, 15 February 2008
Work of M. Zizioulas has been disputed in many Orthodox circles, and giving him a title "one of the world's leading theologians" is very misleading.
In other words, this article is missing part in which his writings are questioned by traditional Orthodox theology represented in the writings of the Fathers, summarized in the works of prof. V. Lossky.
What is the procedure for tagging the article "disputed"? Thanks.
--216.191.72.153 19:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
NPOV
The edits of Cebactokpatop do not conform to Misplaced Pages NPOV, and contained insertions of polemic which amounted to vandalism. Many of the claims were unverified. I tried to improve the page to make it conform to NPOV, and placed a vandalism tag on Cebactokpatop's talk-page.
At the same time, I added additional material concerning the content of Zizioulas' ecclesiology. (Despite the polemical allegations of 'ecumenism' previously in the article, there was previously no description of Zizioulas' ecclesiological views.)
In response, Cebastokpatop simply reverted my edits, and placed a vandalism tag on my talk-page.
I am happy to contribute edits on Misplaced Pages, but I do not wish to become embroiled in endless reverts with someone whose edits on Misplaced Pages are intended to promote a particular polemic unsuitable for an encyclopedia.
If Cebastokpatop is indeed willing to contribute towards the construction of an article which is NPOV, I would be very happy to work with him.
Seminarist (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
NPOV
False accusations easily verifiable by looking at the latest revision of mine. This person is trying to quiet down the voice of the traditional Orthodox people who do not see the work of JZ as Orthodox. That is precisely what we call vandalism, and that is why you deserved tag - vandal.