| Revision as of 22:53, 17 February 2008 editSilly rabbit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,834 edits →I think you need to see this← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:27, 18 February 2008 edit undoDwrcan (talk | contribs)1,395 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 629: | Line 629: | ||
| : I reported ] to ] and ] to ]. The first was blocked, and the second hardblocked. The whole thing is rather silly trolling disruption if you ask me. I would have taken it to RFCU as well, but there seemed to be no point at the time. Good call. ] (]) 22:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | : I reported ] to ] and ] to ]. The first was blocked, and the second hardblocked. The whole thing is rather silly trolling disruption if you ask me. I would have taken it to RFCU as well, but there seemed to be no point at the time. Good call. ] (]) 22:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==== | |||
| Same to you. Enough with the edit war, you've been argued with and beaten twice now. Just get over it, you can't always get your way. Quit acting like a child. | |||
| ] (]) 14:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:27, 18 February 2008
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
re: coat of Arms
view my answer. Oren neu dag (talk) 06:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
again plz see my reply. Oren neu dag (talk) 06:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DP BACKSIDE V 16.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:DP BACKSIDE V 16.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DP CHART V19.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:DP CHART V19.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for balance
I just wanted you to know that I appreciated your recent edits to CIA Sponsored Regime Change. As you probably know, I tend to consider the article hopelessly POV, but, if you can fix that, I will be thankful. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Truce?
Ultramarine, I am really getting tired of this revert war.
- You keep needing to discredit Wing's study by coatracking him. If you had ever had written a scientific paper and have had it published, you would know that you can submit it to several peer reviewed Journals after it has gone through the peer review process. So stating that his article had been rejected by three different journals is actually irrelevant, except to discredit the source.
- You keep needing to insert behind a reference to the Greenpeace article you can't seem to locate even though the link works fine. It appears that you did not read the article. I know this is one of the tactics to remove a dissenting statement and its reference.
why??? Kgrr (talk) 13:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Life expectancy 1950-2005.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Life expectancy 1950-2005.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi
In Elections in Cuba, you "restored" a long sentence that is repeated word for word again at the end of the paragraph. I take it away again. Regards. --Damifb (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grasping the Democratic Peace.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Grasping the Democratic Peace.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Stopping by to leave a note
Your presence on Allegations of State Terrorism by.... is not unwelcome. However, you have already been reminded at least two times to please float controversial edits on the discussion page before committing them to the article. This is something the editors on this page have already long adopted as the means to avoid edit wars and is, in fact, wikipedia's suggested policy. I think i speak for all of the other editors when i say that, for the sake of avoiding edit wars and keeping a productive environment on the article, we do hope you'll abide by wikipedia policy and guidelines when introducing content changes.
Further, i would personally like to point out that, while your presence is not unwelcome, your recent behavior seems to smack of wikistalking. Your reappearance on the Allegations of State Terrorism... coincided with my own re-appearance on the Sandinista page. Since then, it has appeared that your entire activity has been repeated attempts to:
- Force through POV alterations to the article which suffer from such poor grammar and syntax that they are indecipherable
- Contest minor points of content which you had previously accepted and, in some cases, openly validated
- Delete content without first making inquiries or suggestions on the discussion page.
I am assuming that your behavior in these respects is unintentional. The overall picture, however, does suggest that there may be a problem with WP:OWN at work, here.
For my own part i am willing to work with you. I do, however, hope that you will work within the suggested guidelines of the page so that we may avoid an edit war. If i remember correctly, the last time this page suffered an edit war was also the last time you were actively editing it. I think it would reflect badly if one were to break out again, now. Stone put to sky (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Please spare me any personal comments and use the talk page of the article for a factual arguments.Ultramarine (talk) 07:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- These issues concern you personally and are relevant to no specific page in particular. That is what user talk pages were made for, no? Please: take my observations to heart. Stone put to sky (talk) 08:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Your many personal attacks against me has been noted earlier. I prefer a factual discussion.Ultramarine (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- So please -- correct me if i'm wrong -- but with that comment you appear to be saying that, because you feel i have personally attacked you in the past (an assertion i deny, by the way), you are not obliged to work in a consensual manner with the editors on the Allegations of State Terror.... page?
- Can we count on your cooperation with the established editing guidelines on that page? Or are you rejecting our attempts to cooperate with you? Stone put to sky (talk) 09:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- I will always follow the policies of Misplaced Pages and cooperate to create an NPOV, V, and NOR encyclopedia.Ultramarine (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
You're on your own at the state terrorism article. I just don't have the energy or patience to argue with a brick wall. I would highly recommend placing neutral and polite notices on WP:NORN and WP:RSN asking for outside opinions about the matter without framing the issue in one way or another. (I.e. Is this original research? (section link) ... or ... Are these reliable sources for these claims? (claim quote, source list)) Sorry, I just don't have it in me to endlessly argue. Vassyana (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
What attacks, Dude?
I said you can argue like Clarence Darrow. You never seen "Inherit the Wind?" Dude! Don't be so touchy! Ultrastoopid (talk) 16:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I think you need to see this
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/IP_check#Attack_accounts This is really disappointing. Dance With The Devil (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I reported User:Ultrastoopid to WP:AIVU and User:Untimelymaroon to WP:AN/I. The first was blocked, and the second hardblocked. The whole thing is rather silly trolling disruption if you ask me. I would have taken it to RFCU as well, but there seemed to be no point at the time. Good call. Silly rabbit (talk) 22:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
==
Same to you. Enough with the edit war, you've been argued with and beaten twice now. Just get over it, you can't always get your way. Quit acting like a child. Sbw01f (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)