Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:03, 18 February 2008

An apology

To start I must say that I am sorry if I offended you in any way before. Also the Caps lock thing was once. I do not normally address people on talk pages LIKE THIS. Also I saw that you mentioned on my editor review that I do not assume good faith. Can you show me one time that I have not done this? Also improving wikipedia is what I am here for. As you can see I have a considerable amount of edits. I have never vandalised wikipedia. Why would you say that I need to put improving Misplaced Pages first. Again I appologize for any way I have offended you. Thank you for your time. DBZROCKS 14:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

In all fairness, I have seen you type in caps with other people, but I appreciate your apology. I just got the feeling that some of your edits were a little too blunt, and weren't as helpful as they could have been. Just my opinion. You do a good job of getting rid of fandom, and nonsensical statements though. You might want to take a look at the article, Super Saiyan. Quite a bit of it isn't quite encyclopedic, and needs clean up. For example, "Broly's final form is very similar to an Ultra Super Saiyan, but with several notable differences. His size, muscle mass, strength, and speed are far beyond that of any regular Super Saiyan to the point of being ridiculous." That last part just doesn't sound encyclopedic. Malamockq 03:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Seung-Hui Cho

Hello. I've removed Image:Oldboy hammer.jpg from Seung-Hui Cho. The image was uploaded as a fair-use image, however inclusion in Seung-Hui Cho doesn't qualify as fair use. WODUP 23:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

My mistake. WODUP 08:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Comparisons to Oldboy

The comparison is legitimate, and I have cleared editing conflicts with other editors. Please read the following citation, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18207904/site/newsweek/?from=rss

Thanks. Malamockq 15:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I've thought it over and I think it's alright, but just barely hanging on by a thin thread of relevance. As it is phrased in the wikipedia article all it says is that the photos look similar, and seeing as it is in the "Contents" section I suppose this is fine. I just hope that it stays a simple, "Oh look, the pictures look similar" and doesn't turn into a Columbine-style, "The rock music made them kill people" kind of deal. -- itistoday (Talk) 15:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Your revert to King cold

King cold was redirected to list of aliens in dragonball because of his relitive unimportance in dragon ball. If you wish to revive redirects dig it up on the wikiproject dragon ball talk page. DBZROCKS 00:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of comments

Sorry to bother you again but I thought it was worthwhile to tell you that I reverted your edit to the dragon Ball wikiproject talk page. You deleted 3 comments under the grounds that they were trollish. I have looked them (the comments) over and found nothing of the sort. DBZROCKS 21:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

You can't go around deleting peoples comments just because you don't like them. No is not trolling. the third comment may not of been exactally apropriate but it doesn't give you a right to delete it. Unless Dark Dragon Flame specifically attacks you than you can't delete it. DBZROCKS 21:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

My sugestion

I did not say go to the wikiproject Dragon Ball talk page to further the discussion I ment to go there if you wanted to talk about any other redirects that you think are unfair in the future. DBZROCKS 22:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

? What? DBZROCKS 22:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mario128.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mario128.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Velociraptor222.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Velociraptor222.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 21:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Velociraptor222.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Velociraptor222.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Deinonychus

Hey Malamockq!

It appears you have put in 22 edits on Misplaced Pages's article on Deinonychus. This article is a current Featured Article Candidate. If you could drop by the article's candidacy page and indicate how you think the article might be improved, and how it could better meet the Featured Article requirements, it would be greatly appreciated. Your input on this important dinosaur is important. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 02:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:LW3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LW3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell 14:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Page move

Hello. You were brave to "move" the Cricket article, but if it is to be moved it must actually be "moved" to preserve the article's history. Please don't just copy the content to another page. --RobertG ♬ talk 16:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm neutral on the merits of the move. I expect you didn't mean "afd", but "rm"! This would definitely be the right thing to do, but are you aware that it has been discussed before? Best wishes, RobertG ♬ talk 16:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

FYI, also here (I opposed there, but I'm not very sure I'd even enter the discussion now). --RobertG ♬ talk 17:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:Disambiguation The basis for giving priority to popularity over meaning is contained in those guidelines. I strongly disagree with this approach but that is the current consensus. Pendragon39 03:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Assuming Good Faith

In regards to the post I posted here that you have now removed, you say that he removed the mvoe notice from the page. Please caerfully review the diff here to see he did not remove it from the page. The editor in questions moved it below the skip to TOC header. I apologize if I jumped the gun on your warning however find that before you call any editor a vandal you should check and double check the edit. If you have any questions about the edit or fail to see that he did not remove the move notice, please let me know. Thank you and happy editing. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. Malamockq 17:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Problems with an Admin

Hey, I noticed you took note of some wrong doing done by the admin, Friday a little while ago. She's harrassing me right now, and I was wondering if you knew any admins that might tell her to stop. I don't know any myself. If I'm wrong in this, feel free to tell me, but I don't believe I am. 64.236.121.129 15:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

left reply

I left you a reply on my talk page. Ariel. (talk) 15:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Please Cite a Rule!

Please cite a rule that prevents me from typing in all caps. You're getting a bit catty about this and I'm not quite sure why. I replied to your inquiry on the XM8 page that was relavant to the XM8 article. I thought it was a polite and thorough reply. You then ignored my reply and asked some obscure question that does not belong in a talk page. You've ignored repeated warnings about not using talk pages as forums and now you are attacking me with baseless accusations. Stop. You have been warned. --Asams10 (talk) 16:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:XM8 rifle for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Asams10 (talk) 17:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)