Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Capitana: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:17, 18 February 2008 editDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits confirmed← Previous edit Revision as of 20:21, 18 February 2008 edit undoDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits clarify what i meant by "confirmed"Next edit →
Line 36: Line 36:


{{deferred}} The listed accounts are too old for a standard check, however Deskana may have saved the results of his prior check. ] 19:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC) {{deferred}} The listed accounts are too old for a standard check, however Deskana may have saved the results of his prior check. ] 19:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
:{{confirmed}}. Behavioural patterns and checkuser data both match. --] <small>]</small> 20:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC) :{{confirmed}} that Capitana is Lancastria. Behavioural patterns and checkuser data both match. --] <small>]</small> 20:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:21, 18 February 2008

Capitana

Template:Checkuser requests to be listed

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 18:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
That is Danny 17.. not me --Capitana (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Previous related cases

  • Code letter: B
  • Supporting evidence: WP:DUCK for a start.

Indef banned troll User:specialservice/User:Lancastria/User:Danny 17 is back, this time as User:Capitana, All the same hallmarks including trolling my talkpage again , and stalking all my edits. Blanking large numbers of my edits in one go Prester John (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Absolute oppose. User is only posting this because I am discussing him on wikiquette for possible racist edits. I am sure many users have warned PJ I cannot be the first. We can't all be socks! See WP:ANI. I am discussing PJ's threat to post me on RFCU with admins. It seems (from the above) that PJ orders checkusers on anyone who gives him a sharp word about his conduct. Checkuser is not for fishing --Capitana (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Also - no arbcom ruling has been made - "Cat:B" has been used anyway - this warrants a decline --Capitana (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
NOTE - The reporter is asking friendly admins to conduct the check themselves http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Deskana&diff=192366654&oldid=192302011 - not to insult Deskana but I believe Prester John believes he will recieve an advantage and that his frivolous checkuser request may be accepted if he contacts specific admins. --Capitana (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Deskana handled previous cases and is the most experienced with this particular troll. In closing statements of ] Deskana refers to the socks accusations of my "racism", another hallmark of User:Capitana Prester John (talk) 20:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment: And you've been hopping around various locales as well. . Let the CU request go through or if its bad faith, then let it fail. No need to keep pressing on about it. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
I will bloody well go on about it! Because PJ knows I have used one of the above IP's. I'll tell you how he knows - because I asked for it to be blocked! He knows it will come up positive because I got the address blocked in the first place. That's his intention! --Capitana (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

information Note: I don't have info on Danny 17 and the others, but every other account on the IPs involved has been blocked as a sockpuppet or obvious vandal account, and the underlying IPs have multiple vandalism blocks as well. Thatcher 20:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

 Deferred The listed accounts are too old for a standard check, however Deskana may have saved the results of his prior check. Thatcher 19:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

 Confirmed that Capitana is Lancastria. Behavioural patterns and checkuser data both match. --Deskana (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)