| Revision as of 16:30, 20 February 2008 editSeminarist (talk | contribs)347 edits Removal of silly comments← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:31, 20 February 2008 edit undoCebactokpatop (talk | contribs)252 edits Undid revision 192822681 by Seminarist (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ] (]) 20:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | ] (]) 20:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==== | |||
| Now you're making up stories. '''I didn't ever modify any text on the Zizioulas talk page'''. But, really, there's no need to. You've said you won't apologise. Fine. But just go with your decision; don't fabricate falsehoods. ] (]) 15:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You are not bordering with the lies anymore. You are in: on discussion page. | |||
| ] (]) 15:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:31, 20 February 2008
NPOV on John Zizioulas page
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to John Zizioulas. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Cebactokpatop (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I have not vandalised the John Zizioulas page. You appear to be retaliating to my removal of vandalism which you placed on the John Zizioulas page by adding a vandalism tag to my talk page. The reason I added a vandalism tag was your picture of Zizioulas sitting beside the Pope which had been labelled 'Picture of the John Zizioulas (black robe) revealing his true face and position.' Please see Misplaced Pages BLP.
Yes you have. You are promoting "pro" Zizioulas view by calling all those who disagree with you "vandals". Your attempt to hide the fact that many people disagree with his work is obvious. What is very low is the way you are tying to do it.
Cebactokpatop (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Being derogatory does not help build consensus.
You are wrong - I am not trying to hide any views. I only want the article to be encyclopedic and NPOV. I would be very glad if you would provide NPOV verifiable descriptions of criticisms of Zizioulas.
Seminarist (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Disgraceful Behavior by This User - Proven
Now you're making up stories. I didn't ever modify any text on the Zizioulas talk page. But, really, there's no need to. You've said you won't apologise. Fine. But just go with your decision; don't fabricate falsehoods. Seminarist (talk) 15:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
You are not bordering with the lies anymore. You are in: Seminarist modifies text put down by the Cebactokpatop on discussion page.