| Revision as of 15:36, 21 February 2008 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,689 editsm Signing comment by 24.169.10.78 - ""← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:44, 21 February 2008 edit undoOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits Indiana University ArchiveNext edit → | ||
| Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
| Hi, are you from USSR? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Hi, are you from USSR? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ==Indiana University Archive== | |||
| While the link may be spam in ''some'' articles, it isn't in the ] or ] articles. For these two particular articles, it holds a comprehensive back issue archive of publications of two Irish political parties which aren't even available on the websites of the organisations themselves. and for details. While spam cleanup is important, if regular editors of the articles who are familiar with that link (I've used it for cites previously in other articles) say the link belongs, it isn't really good form to repeatedly revert them including the use of rollback. Thanks. <font face="Verdana">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 18:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:44, 21 February 2008
| Archives |
|---|
| /Archive /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6 /Archive7 /Archive8 /Archive9 /Archive10 WP:GRIEF m:MPOV |
Friday 24 January 15:13 UTC
| If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it. Please leave responses on your talk page. Thanks. |
| “ | Another key to the problem here, {name of contentious editor}. You don't see yourself as having an opinion; you see yourself as bearing the Truth. You perceive your biases as neutral.. | ” |
| — WP:TIGERS | ||
| The following is a list of articles currently nominated for speedy deletion. |
| I'm currently in the process of re-assessing the usefulness of this tool. It may be replaced with something using the new <categorytree> syntax (although that doesn't have all of the functionality), or it might be deleted altogether. If you have any comments, please make them known on the talk page. --Cyde Weys 02:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The CSD list is not intended to be used for transclusion purposes. By doing so, you are creating many unnecessary "What links here" entries that administrators on CSD patrol have to peruse on each deletion. Think of the tiny benefit that transclusion affords you versus the large hindrance that it creates to many administrators each time every CSD is dealt with, and you will realize why it is no longer permitted.
See also |
|
|---|
| This is a list of deletable PRODs. |
| Category:Expired proposed deletions |
|
|---|
| This is a readout of various categories. |
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This is a readout of the current RfAs. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Welcome
Welcome to the talk page 
. --Hu12 (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Paralegal
I added information on certification. OK? Bearian (talk) 01:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Asia fanclub spam being re-added again
The owner of the Asia fanclub has sidetracked the Wiki blacklist of his original website URL and registered a new "un-black'd" version to spam the Asia (band) article again. This time he is showing up as http://asiafanclub.4t.com/contact.html. Is there any chance of having this address blacklisted as well? Using sockpuppets and issuing legal threats is one thing... but now he is moved up to a new level of spam determination. Can it be blocked? Thanks for you help. 156.34.225.77 (talk) 23:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- I hate being called an SOB :) . It's so un-wiki-like. :D 156.34.225.77 (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
| Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 58 supporting, 0 opposing, and 2 neutral. I hope to demonstrate that your trust in me is rightly placed and am always open to critiques and suggestions. Cheers. MBisanz 03:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |  |
Comparison of one-click hosters
Hi, I've seen that you have deleted the history of the article and the discussion page of Comparison of one-click hosters (here) for the reason of "Housekeeping". I don't think that this is a case of housekeeping, because this information is still useful for me and other users, so I would like to ask you to restore the history. Thanks. --X-Bert (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- userfied. cheers--Hu12 (talk) 13:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Could you please also restore the original discussion page? It is interesting for anybody who wonders why there is no such extended list. --X-Bert (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- ==Deletion Review for Talk:Comparison of one-click hosters==
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Talk:Comparison of one-click hosters. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --X-Bert (talk) 09:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
please unrevert your revert
of my last edit (although I realize this is a shared address). for personal reasons I do not wish to log in, but I am that user (mail me for confirmation if you care to). cheers, alex. 209.183.34.45 (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
I do not understand
I do not understand this as the editor in question is not currently blocked. --Kralizec! (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Just an FYI that I am reverting your revert, as editors are free to delete comments from their talk page at will. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Bamford and that COI tag
He's at it again; see WP:ANI#Bamford and that COI tag. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI
Please note this page where an editor has opened up a Deletion Review of an AfD debate you were involved in. Whilst such a request is clearly within their rights that editor has only contacted one or two of those who took part during the AfD process. It would in my view be more appropriate to include a notice to all persons (including yourself) that were interested in the first Article for Deletion debate, and I provide such a notice and link here. Best wishes --VS 22:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
RFA support
→ In re: Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/EdJohnston.
Your support is obvious to anyone who reads the nomination, but it you don't add it in the numbered section as well it won't be counted — Athaenara ✉ 23:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
This isn't the kind of note which really calls for archiving, so feel free to delete it after (rather than before? *doh*) you've read it! — Athaenara ✉ 23:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks--Hu12 (talk) 19:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Mule (Software)
Hi Hu12, I noticed you reverted the edits on the Mule (Software) page. I'm not sure why you did this - the edits appear just fine to me. Are there particular edits that you feel inappropriate. By coincidence, this article has become interesting to me recently - I'm not stalking you! Bardcom (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Hu12, is it OK to revert some or all of your edits on the Mule (Software) page? If I understood your reasons to undo the previous edits, I'd make sure that the same mistake was avoided this time... Bardcom (talk) 13:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Its reverted, error on my part. thanks Bardcom--Hu12 (talk) 14:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Bamford
I had really hoped this user would just give up and leave, but it seems he hasn't, good call by you. My bad for not blocking longer sooner. MBisanz 19:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- He's said for days he's leaving, yet he stays and trolls. Would be a completely different scenario if he "wanted" to work with others and learn. It is sad.--Hu12 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I just saw the huge list of IPs and his attacks. This bad cop is not learning and after the 48h will likely be right back at it. I expect that this will next go to an indefinite block and a month or so of semi-protection on all the pages he's interested in and full protection on his account talk pages. This would give him time to loose interest and find something else to do (i.e. somewhere else to do it). If such a discussion occurs on an/i or elsewhere, please let me know and I'll comment. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
barnstar
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| It really should be The Common Sense Barnstar. You are a user who sees through the bureaucracy of Misplaced Pages and does what is right and logical. Rschen7754 (T C) 06:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
- Thanks!--Hu12 (talk) 07:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
You know the rest :) --Herby 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Rfa thanks
Hi Hu12! Thanks for nominating me, and I'll try to live up to your kind words. EdJohnston (talk) 17:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well deserved, you wil be a great sysop! Oh yeah, try not to block yourself (its tempting)..LOL--Hu12 (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
unprotect Monitor Group discussion page
Hi, I was just wondering if you could unprotect the discussion page . I think you originally protected it because the article was deleted but it has since been recreated. 216.80.64.153 (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Done--Hu12 (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
message
Hi, are you from USSR? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.169.10.78 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Indiana University Archive
While the link may be spam in some articles, it isn't in the 32 County Sovereignty Movement or Saoirse articles. For these two particular articles, it holds a comprehensive back issue archive of publications of two Irish political parties which aren't even available on the websites of the organisations themselves. See here and here for details. While spam cleanup is important, if regular editors of the articles who are familiar with that link (I've used it for cites previously in other articles) say the link belongs, it isn't really good form to repeatedly revert them including the use of rollback. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 18:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)