Misplaced Pages

Abortion and mental health: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:37, 25 February 2008 editIronAngelAlice (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,988 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:38, 25 February 2008 edit undoStrider12 (talk | contribs)1,243 edits →United States Surgeon General: clarified Koop was agreeing with the statement made by Weiss...the quote is not Koop's words, though frequently misreported as his -- see talk and transcriptsNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:
Ultimately, Koop reviewed over 250 studies pertaining to the psychological impact of abortion. Koop wrote in a letter to Reagan that "scientific studies do not provide conclusive data about the health effects of abortion on women."<ref name="times1-11-89">, by Martin Tolchin. Published in the '']'' on ] ]; accessed ] ].</ref> Koop acknowleged the political context of the question in his letter, writing: "In the minds of some of , it was a foregone conclusion that the negative health effects of abortion on women were so overwhelming that the evidence would force the reversal of Roe vs. Wade."<ref name="times3-17-89"/> Ultimately, Koop reviewed over 250 studies pertaining to the psychological impact of abortion. Koop wrote in a letter to Reagan that "scientific studies do not provide conclusive data about the health effects of abortion on women."<ref name="times1-11-89">, by Martin Tolchin. Published in the '']'' on ] ]; accessed ] ].</ref> Koop acknowleged the political context of the question in his letter, writing: "In the minds of some of , it was a foregone conclusion that the negative health effects of abortion on women were so overwhelming that the evidence would force the reversal of Roe vs. Wade."<ref name="times3-17-89"/>


In later testimony before the ], Koop stated that the quality of existing evidence was too poor to prepare a report "that could withstand scientific and statistical scrutiny." Koop noted that "... there is no doubt about the fact that some people have severe psychological effects after abortion, but anecdotes do not make good scientific material."<ref name="times3-17-89">, by Warren E. Leary. Published in the '']'' on ] ]; accessed ] ].</ref> In his congressional testimony, Koop described any possible psychological risks of abortion as "miniscule from a public health perspective."<ref name="Bazelon"/><ref name="washingtonmonthly"/><ref name="newscientist">, by Christopher Joyce. Published in the '']'' on ] ]. Accessed ] ].</ref> In later testimony before the ], Koop stated that the quality of existing evidence was too poor to prepare a report "that could withstand scientific and statistical scrutiny." Koop noted that "... there is no doubt about the fact that some people have severe psychological effects after abortion, but anecdotes do not make good scientific material."<ref name="times3-17-89">, by Warren E. Leary. Published in the '']'' on ] ]; accessed ] ].</ref> In his congressional testimony, Koop agreed with the statement of Congressman Weiss that the pychological risks of abortion as "miniscule from a public health perspective."<ref name="Bazelon"/><ref name="washingtonmonthly"/><ref name="newscientist">, by Christopher Joyce. Published in the '']'' on ] ]. Accessed ] ].</ref>


Subsequently, a Congressional committee charged that Koop refused to publish the results of his review because he failed to find evidence that abortion was harmful, and that Koop watered down his findings in his letter to Reagan by claiming that the studies were inconclusive. Congressman ], who oversaw the investigation, argued that when Koop found no evidence that abortion was harmful, "he therefore decided not to issue a report, but instead to write a letter to the president which would be sufficiently vague as to avoid supporting the pro-choice position that abortion is safe for women."<ref name="newscientist"/> Subsequently, a Congressional committee charged that Koop refused to publish the results of his review because he failed to find evidence that abortion was harmful, and that Koop watered down his findings in his letter to Reagan by claiming that the studies were inconclusive. Congressman ], who oversaw the investigation, argued that when Koop found no evidence that abortion was harmful, "he therefore decided not to issue a report, but instead to write a letter to the president which would be sufficiently vague as to avoid supporting the pro-choice position that abortion is safe for women."<ref name="newscientist"/>

Revision as of 19:38, 25 February 2008

Template:Totallydisputed

Abortion
Main topics
Movements
Issues
By country
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
South America
Law
Methods
Religion

The relationship between abortion and mental health has been an area of political controversy, but of little scientific controversy. A number of studies have concluded that abortion is associated with no more psychological risk than carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term. A smaller number of studies have reported a statistical correlation between abortion and negative psychological effects, though no studies have found a causal relationship. Pre-existing factors in a woman's life, such as emotional attachment to the pregnancy, lack of social support, pre-existing psychiatric illness, and conservative views on abortion increase the likelihood of experiencing negative feelings after an abortion. Summarizing the evidence, the American Psychological Association has found that "severe negative reactions are rare and are in line with those following other normal life stresses."

Some proposed negative psychological effects of abortion have been referred to by pro-life advocates as a separate condition called "post-abortion syndrome". However, the existence of "post-abortion syndrome" is not recognized by any medical or psychological organization, and some physicians and pro-choice advocates have argued that the effort to popularize the idea of a "post-abortion syndrome" is a tactic used by pro-life advocates for political purposes.

Neutral and positive psychological effects of abortion

Studies have indicated that those who have undergone abortion have experienced positive or no change to their mental health. A 1989 study of teenagers who sought pregnancy tests found that counting from the beginning of pregnancy until two years later, the level of stress and anxiety of those who had an abortion did not differ from that of those who had not been pregnant or who had carried their pregnancy to term. A study done at the University of Washington found no correlation between a history of abortion and suicide following a subsequent pregnancy.

Another study in 1992 found that having one abortion was positively associated with higher global self-esteem, particularly feelings of self-worth, capableness, and not feeling one is a failure, but that this positive association was not significant after controlling for childbearing and resource variables. It also noted that adverse emotional reactions to the abortion are influenced by pre-existing psychological conditions and other negative factors and, furthermore, that well-being was separately and positively related to employment, income, and education, but negatively related to total number of children. The authors concluded that "No evidence of widespread post-abortion trauma was found."

In a 2005 US study, the evidence was inconclusive as to whether abortion as compared to completion of an undesired first pregnancy was related to increased risk of depression.

Negative feelings experienced after abortion

During the last fifteen years, prospective and case-control studies have found that abortion is associated with higher rates of psychiatric treatment anxiety, depression,alcohol use,, post-traumatic stress disorder, drug use,, increased requests for medical treatement and worsening of general health, suicidal thoughts completed suicides, and child maltreatment.

Various studies suggest that some women experience stress after a miscarriage or abortion. The kind of stress and the amount of stress women experience varies from culture to culture. Studies also suggest that an individual woman's stress level is influenced by her economic status, family situation and the status of her mental health before the pregnancy. Although no studies have been able to establish a causal relationship between abortion and depression or stress, many studies cite the pre-existence of depression and stress in a sub-set of women who procure abortions. No causal link has been established between abortion and mental illness. Emotional distress may occur in a minority of women who are contemplating or have had an abortion due to a number of factors, including pre-existing mental health problems, the status of the woman's relationship with her partner, poor economic status, poor social network, or conservative views held on abortion.

Post-abortion syndrome

Post-abortion syndrome (PAS) is a term used to describe a set of adverse psychopathological characteristics which are proposed to occur in a small percentage of women following an induced abortion. Primarily a term used by pro-life advocates, PAS is not a medically recognized syndrome; PAS is not listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and neither the American Psychological Association nor American Psychiatric Association recognize it. Some physicians and pro-choice advocates have argued that attempts to popularize the term "post-abortion syndrome" are a tactic used by pro-life advocates for political purposes.

While some studies have shown a correlation between abortion and clinical depression, anxiety, suicidal behaviors, or adverse effects on women's sexual functions for a small number of women, these correlations may be explained by pre-existing social circumstances and emotional health. According to the American Psychological Association, various factors, such as emotional attachment to the pregnancy, lack of support, and conservative views on abortion, may increase the likelihood of experiencing negative reactions. Studies have either failed to establish a causal relationship between abortion and negative psychological symptoms experienced by women, or been inconclusive.

Studies by major institutions

United States Surgeon General

In 1987, President Ronald Reagan directed U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, an evangelical Christian and abortion opponent, to issue a report on the health effects of abortion. Reportedly, the idea for the review was conceived by Reagan advisors Dinesh D'Souza and Gary Bauer as a means of "rejuvenat" the pro-life movement by producing evidence of the risks of abortion. Koop was reluctant to accept the assignment, believing that Reagan was more concerned with appeasing his political base than with improving women's health.

Ultimately, Koop reviewed over 250 studies pertaining to the psychological impact of abortion. Koop wrote in a letter to Reagan that "scientific studies do not provide conclusive data about the health effects of abortion on women." Koop acknowleged the political context of the question in his letter, writing: "In the minds of some of , it was a foregone conclusion that the negative health effects of abortion on women were so overwhelming that the evidence would force the reversal of Roe vs. Wade."

In later testimony before the United States Congress, Koop stated that the quality of existing evidence was too poor to prepare a report "that could withstand scientific and statistical scrutiny." Koop noted that "... there is no doubt about the fact that some people have severe psychological effects after abortion, but anecdotes do not make good scientific material." In his congressional testimony, Koop agreed with the statement of Congressman Weiss that the pychological risks of abortion as "miniscule from a public health perspective."

Subsequently, a Congressional committee charged that Koop refused to publish the results of his review because he failed to find evidence that abortion was harmful, and that Koop watered down his findings in his letter to Reagan by claiming that the studies were inconclusive. Congressman Theodore S. Weiss, who oversaw the investigation, argued that when Koop found no evidence that abortion was harmful, "he therefore decided not to issue a report, but instead to write a letter to the president which would be sufficiently vague as to avoid supporting the pro-choice position that abortion is safe for women."

1987-1990 APA Task Force Review

In response to Surgeon General Koop's review of available data, the American Psychological Association Division on Population and Environmental Psychology prepared and presented their own summary of the literature and recommendations for Koop's report. After Koop refused to issue their findings, division members published a synthesis of their own findings in which they concluded that "The weight of the evidence does not pose a psychological hazard for most women."

The task force concluded that "research with diverse samples, different measures of response, and different times of assessment have come to similar conclusions. The time of greatest distress is likely to be before the abortion. Severe negative reactions after abortions are rare and can best be understood in the framework of coping with normal life stress." Nancy Adler, professor of psychology at the University of California, San Francisco, has testified on behalf of the APA that "severe negative reactions are rare and are in line with those following other normal life stresses."

In 2007, APA established a new task force to review studies on abortion published since 1989. The new task force report is expected to be published in 2008.

Nada Stotland

In 1992, psychiatrist Nada Stotland of the University of Chicago, and current vice president of the American Psychiatric Association, wrote in Journal of the American Medical Association, "...there is no evidence of an abortion-trauma syndrome." Stotland identified three groups of women as being at risk of negative psychological reactions to abortion: those who were psychiatrically ill before pregnancy, those who undergo abortion under external pressure, and those who underwent abortion in "aversive" circumstances such as abandonment or stigmatization. In a 2003 review article, Stotland wrote: "Currently, there are active attempts to convince the public and women considering abortion that abortion frequently has negative psychiatric consequences. This assertion is not borne out by the literature: the vast majority of women tolerate abortion without psychiatric sequelae."

Mika Gissler

A government record-based study of all Finnish women found that the suicide rate for women who had had an abortion the year previously was higher than for women who had given birth. The study could not determine a causal relationship, and found that the association could indicate the existence of overlapping risk factors for both abortion and suicide in the study population. The authors state:

The relation between suicide, mental disorders, life events, social class, and social support is a complex one. Abortion might mean a selection of women at higher risk for suicide because of reasons like depression. Another explanation for the higher suicide rate after an abortion could be low social class, low social support, and previous life events or that abortion is chosen by women who are at higher risk for suicide because of other reasons. Increased risk for a suicide after an induced abortion can, besides indicating common risk factors for both, result from a negative effect of induced abortion on mental wellbeing. With our data, however, it was not possible to study the causality more carefully. Our data clearly show, however, that women who have experienced an abortion have an increased risk of suicide, which should be taken into account in the prevention of such deaths.

References

  1. ^ American Psychological Association. "APA research review finds no evidence of 'post-abortion syndrome' but research studies on psychological effects of abortion inconclusive." Press release, January 18, 1989.
  2. ^ Is There a Post-Abortion Syndrome? By Emily Bazelon. Published in the New York Times Magazine, January 21 2007. Accessed January 11 2008.
  3. ^ Research and Destroy, by Chris Mooney. Published in Washington Monthly, October 2004.
  4. "Post-Abortion Politics" NOW with David Brancaccio on PBS
  5. ^ Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE (1990). "Psychological responses after abortion". Science. 248 (4951): 41–4. PMID 2181664.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. Family Planning and Perspectives by Nancy Adler
  7. ^ Grimes DA, Creinin MD (2004). "Induced abortion: an overview for internists". Ann. Intern. Med. 140 (8): 620–6. PMID 15096333. Key summary points: "Abortion does not lead to an increased risk for breast cancer or other late psychiatric or medical sequelae." On p. 624, the authors state: "The alleged 'postabortion trauma syndrome' does not exist."
  8. ^ Stotland NL (2003). "Abortion and psychiatric practice". J Psychiatr Pract. 9 (2): 139–49. PMID 15985924. "Currently, there are active attempts to convince the public and women considering abortion that abortion frequently has negative psychiatric consequences. This assertion is not borne out by the literature: the vast majority of women tolerate abortion without psychiatric sequelae."
  9. ^ Stotland NL. The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome. JAMA. 1992 Oct 21;268(15):2078-9. PMID 1404747.
  10. Zabin, L.S., Hirsch, M.B., Emerson, M.R. (1989). When urban adolescents choose abortion: effects on education, psychological status and subsequent pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives, 21 (6), 248-55. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
  12. Russo, N. F., & Zierk, K.L. (1992). Abortion, childbearing, and women. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(4), 269-280. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
  13. Schmiege, S. & Russo, N.F. (2005). Depression and unwanted first pregnancy: longitudinal cohort study Electronic version. British Medical Journal, 331 (7528), 1303. Retrieved 2006-01-11.
  14. ^ Reardon DC, et al, Psychiatric admissions of low income women following abortion and childbirth. CMAJ 168:1253-6, 2003.
  15. Coleman PK, et al. State-funded abortions vs. deliveries: A comparison of outpatient mental health claims over five years. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 2002, Vol. 72, No. 1, 141-152.
  16. ^ Berkeley D, Humphrey PL, Davidson C, Demands made on general practice by women before and after an abortion. JR Coll Gen Pract. 34:310-315, 1984.
  17. Badgley, et.al.,Report of the Committee on the Operation of the Abortion Law (Ottawa:Supply and Services, 1977)pp.313-321.
  18. ^ Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM, Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 47:16-25, 2006.
  19. Cougle JR, Reardon DC, Coleman PK. Generalized anxiety following unintended pregnancies resolved through childbirth and abortion: a cohort study of the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. J Anxiety Disord. 2005;19(1):137-42.
  20. Ellen W. Freeman et al., Emotional Distress Patterns Among Women Having First or Repeat Abortions, 55 Obstetrics & gynecology 630 (1980)
  21. Cougle JR, Reardon DC, Coleman PK. Depression associated with abortion and childbirth: a long-term analysis of the NLSY cohort. Med Sci Monit. 2003 Apr;9(4):CR105-12.
  22. Drower SA, Nash ES, Therapeutic abortion on psychiatric grounds. S. Afr Med J 54:604-8, 1978.
  23. Reardon DC, Ney PG, Abortion and subsequent substance abuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 26:61-75, 2000.
  24. ^ Priscilla K. Coleman et al., History of Induced Abortion in Relation to Substance Use During Pregnancies Carried to Term, 187 Am. J. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1673 (2002);
  25. Elizabeth R. Morrissey & Marc A. Schuckit, Stressful Life Events and Alcohol Problems Among Women Seen At a Detoxication Center, 39 J. Stud. Alcohol 1559, 1567, 1570 (1978);
  26. Major B, Cozzarelli C, Cooper ML, Zubek J, Richards C, Wilhite M, Gramzow RH. Psychological responses of women after first-trimester abortion. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;57(8):777-84.
  27. Suliman S, Ericksen T, Labuschgne P, de Wit R, Stein DJ, Seedat S (2007). "Comparison of pain, cortisol levels, and psychological distress in women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy under local anaesthesia versus intravenous sedation". BMC Psychiatry 7: 24.
  28. Rue VM, Coleman PK, Rue JJ, Reardon DC. Induced abortion and traumatic stress: A preliminary comparison of American and Russian women.Med Sci Monit, 2004 10(10): SR5-16.
  29. Reardon DC, Coleman PK, Cougle JR. Substance use associated with unintended pregnancy outcomes in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Am. J. Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2004; 26(1):369 - 383.
  30. Ney PG, Fung T, Wickett AR, Beaman-Dodd, Effects of pregnancy loss on women's health. Soc Sci Med 38: 1193-1200, 1994.
  31. Truls Ostbye et al., Health Services Utilization After Induced Abortions In Ontario: A Comparison Between Community Clinics and Hospitals, 16 Am. J. Med. Quality 99 (2001).
  32. Warren B. Miller et al., Testing a Model of the Psychological Consequences of Abortion, in The new civil war: the psychology, culture, and politics of abortion. 235, 244 (Linda J. Beckman & S. Marie Harvey eds., 1998).
  33. Christopher Morgan et al., Suicides After Pregnancy: Mental Health May Deteriorate as a Direct Effect of Induced Abortion, 314 BRIT. MED. J. 902 (1997).
  34. Gissler M, Hemminski E, Longuist J, Suicides after pregnancy in Finland. BMJ 313:1431-34, 1996.
  35. Reardon DC, Ney PG, et al, Deaths associated pregnancy outcome; a record linkage study. Southern Med J. 96:834-41, 2002.
  36. Coleman PK et al, Associations between voluntary and involuntary forms of perinatal loss and child maltreatment among low income mothers. Acta Peadiatr 94:1476-83, 2005.
  37. Ney PG, Fung T, Wickett AR, Relationship between induced abortion and child abuse and neglect: four studies. Pre and Perinatal Psychology J 8:43-63, 1993.
  38. The quality of caregiving environment and child development outcomes associated with maternal history of abortion using the NLSY data. J Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2002; 43(6):743-57. Coleman PK, Reardon DC, Cougle JR.
  39. M. Benedict, R. White, and P. Comely. Maternal Perinatal Risk Factors and Child Abuse, Child Abuse and Neglect, 9:217-224(1985).
  40. Legal abortion: a painful necessity - Sweden
  41. Psychological effects of abortion Portugal
  42. Gómez Lavín C, Zapata García R (2005). "Diagnostic categorization of post-abortion syndrome". Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 33 (4): 267–72. PMID 15999304.
  43. Science in support of a cause: the new research, by Michael Kranish. Published in the Boston Globe on July 31 2005; accessed November 27 2007.
  44. Cooper, Cynthia L. Abortion Under Attack
  45. Russo NF, Denious JE (2005). "Controlling birth: science, politics, and public policy". J Soc Issues. 61 (1): 181–91. PMID 17073030.
  46. TIME. Abortion on Demand
  47. ^ The C. Everett Koop Papers: Reproduction and Family Health. A profile by the National Library of Medicine. Accessed February 23 2008.
  48. ^ Bucking the Gipper, by Chris Mooney. Published in Washington Monthly, October 2004. Accessed February 18 2008.
  49. Koop's Stand on Abortion's Effect Surprises Friends and Foes Alike, by Martin Tolchin. Published in the New York Times on January 11 1989; accessed February 18 2008.
  50. ^ Koop Says Abortion Report Couldn't Survive Challenge, by Warren E. Leary. Published in the New York Times on March 17 1989; accessed February 18 2008.
  51. ^ Reagan's officials 'suppressed' research on abortion, by Christopher Joyce. Published in the New Scientist on December 16 1989. Accessed February 18 2008.
  52. Family Planning and Perspectives by Nancy Adler
  53. Gissler M, Hemminki E, Lönnqvist J (1996). "Suicides after pregnancy in Finland, 1987-94: register linkage study". BMJ. 313 (7070): 1431–4. PMID 8973229.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. Suicides after pregnancy in Finland, 1987-94: register linkage study

External links

Major media coverage
Pro-choice sources
Pro-life sources
Categories: