Revision as of 23:45, 26 February 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Thanks: ...again← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:57, 26 February 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Thanks: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Thanks again for more sockpuppet reverting. =) -- ] (]) 23:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | Thanks again for more sockpuppet reverting. =) -- ] (]) 23:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Re : Yeah, there is a certain amount of satisfaction that comes with the block button. =) Especially for the uncreative ones. -- ] (]) 23:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
==''Signpost'' updated for February 4th, 2008.== | ==''Signpost'' updated for February 4th, 2008.== |
Revision as of 23:57, 26 February 2008
Gonzo fan2007 (talk)
|
Click to show talk page info and guidelines
TigerManXLDo you think we're anywhere near an indef block for this guy? He's got a pretty long and disruptive history. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 00:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
HelloSomeone keeps posting my personal information on my talk page. I do not want any random hacker to see it and I have no idea who put it there. Could you please block the person doing this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.151.12.169 (talk) 00:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
WP:RPPI noticed you're a new admin who's been helping out here recently, and wanted to leave you some sage advice from more articulate people than me; my distilled point would be that there are alternate avenues than protection, but it's not like I don't do the latter often. :-) east.718 at 03:34, February 1, 2008
Invitation to discussion about possible COI of editorshttp://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:United_States_presidential_election%2C_2008#Possible_COI_of_two_editors --70.11.142.4 (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Disruptive userHey Gonzo I would just like point out that this user is continually changing the same thing on Indianapolis City-County Council even after I explained why they are being reverted and gave them 2 warnings. I counted that they have reverted my edits 6 times (although not in violation of 3RR because they're spread out). Maybe a block would be sufficient? Thanks. HoosierState 20:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Please explain to him that I am more than qualified to correct this certain post., is just not accepted on Misplaced Pages. Everyone is of equal editing. HoosierState 03:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Deletion of NFL Season TemplatesGonzo fan- A user is submitting deletion requests for all of the templates that I created for the 1951 NFL seasons and before. I'd appreciate your help in defending their existence. Thank you -- Fruminous (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC) An update: I came to an accord with the nominator. I've placed them on all of your Packer pages (let's hear it for teams with long histories!) to keep things like this from happening again. Fruminous (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Hey! -- Just saw that you have recently become an administrator. Congratulations! If I had known, I would have been happy to add my support! Fruminous (talk) 06:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Another FL nomWould you have any problem with me nom San Diego Chargers seasons? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bole2 (talk • contribs) ThanksThanks for dealing with that obsessive vandal of mine. Bleah. =\ -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again for more sockpuppet reverting. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Thank youThanks for semiprotecting Joan of Arc. Durova 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Protection of Alpaca?Can you pleas eunprotect, a 2 week protection is hardly warranted for one to two instances of vandalism a day. Viridae 05:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC) San Francisco protectionI looked at the few days before the recent incident, and decided that some protection was warranted. I will shorten my protection to five days. Is that acceptable to you? Acalamari 03:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Zwuh?Respected? Moi? I'm rarely on the positive end of those sort of inferences. :) Jmlk17 09:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Thanks!Thanks for unprotecting the Death Heart article. I just noticed in the history that you had done it. Appreciated! - Dicecollector29 (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Gracias!Thanks for blocking my favorite returning profane IP vandal. I don't even remember why he hates me so, but I appreciate you getting him off our backs for a little while. Thanks! Snowfire51 (talk) 06:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
ITNIt is disappointing that somebody who has been given admin rights would use those priviledges to change a page without reference to the expected syntax for that page. Kevin McE (talk) 07:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC) User talk:DouglasfgregoI think you should reconsider your request on WP:RFPP and delete the page per m:right to vanish. Stifle (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Please cancel an edit violating The 3RR
Please cancel his fourth revert - which violates 3RR. No need to warn him, because I'm sure it was not done on purpose! He's an honest person who is absolutely aware to the 3RR and has always obeyed the 3RR. Eliko (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC) List of ethnic slursAppologies for th trouble w/ speedy deletion - It was indeed my intent to nominate that page for speedy deletion (did not think it failed to meet the requirements, sorry) - i simply could not place the tag on that page as i lack an account and the page is semi protected. I figured the best place to place the note then would be in candidates for speedy deletion - as i wanted to make it a canditate for speedy deletion. What is the proper way for nominating an article for anything (deletion, speedy deletion, revision, featured ,etc.) - if it is protected or semi protected? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.0.220 (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC) Re: Packers templateI'm aware of that. It's only because a separate category for NFL templates has yet to be created (NFL List category hasn't either). But there's probably hundreds of templates out there I've tagged with the Template category, so for uniformity (when a separate category is created), I'd like all NFL templates to be classed as that. Pats1 /C 12:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
ThanksThank's for the revert on my userpage! J.delanoyadds 20:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC) J.delanoyadds has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Packer Project PageI love the new Packer subproject page. I'm so happy to see so many people "borrowing" my layout for the MCB project! :) Have you considered going with a dark green on the title bars? It'll go well with the yellow you're using for the background, I think. – ClockworkSoul 23:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
|