| Revision as of 20:33, 29 February 2008 editDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits →Dust: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:29, 29 February 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Dust: Reply | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| The reason your links reguarding products/businesses were removed is because links of that nature are not allowed as per ]. Although you meant good, others could assume they are of a promoting nature. It would be best to find another source that is not a business or product. ] (]) 20:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | The reason your links reguarding products/businesses were removed is because links of that nature are not allowed as per ]. Although you meant good, others could assume they are of a promoting nature. It would be best to find another source that is not a business or product. ] (]) 20:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Re : As Daedalus noted above, the link was removed because links to commercial sites on generic articles like ] is generally frowned upon due to possible bias as being advertising. Links to commercial sites are allowed if the link contains information that can not easily be added to the article itself or is topically relevant to the article (e.g., linking to 3M's website on the ] article). As for the use of water, you can add such information to the article and ] the Ohio EPA and Federal EPA reports. I think it would be a good addition to the article. -- ] (]) 21:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:29, 29 February 2008
You'll likely have to wait a bit on the help for Morral: sorry, but I'm about to be leaving where I am, and I'll not be back to having Internet access in a few days. I'll try to help when I can. Nyttend (talk) 17:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Dust
The reason your links reguarding products/businesses were removed is because links of that nature are not allowed as per WP:EL. Although you meant good, others could assume they are of a promoting nature. It would be best to find another source that is not a business or product. Daedalus (talk) 20:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: As Daedalus noted above, the link was removed because links to commercial sites on generic articles like Dust is generally frowned upon due to possible bias as being advertising. Links to commercial sites are allowed if the link contains information that can not easily be added to the article itself or is topically relevant to the article (e.g., linking to 3M's website on the 3M article). As for the use of water, you can add such information to the article and reference the Ohio EPA and Federal EPA reports. I think it would be a good addition to the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)