Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:17, 13 March 2008

March 2008

Mechelzidek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

did not know/violate rule

Decline reason:

Not currently blocked... — Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Judaism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ 14:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

You have violated the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. El_C 14:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not actually interested in discussing this —or anything for that matter— with you. Just informing you of the rules. El_C 14:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Again, I'm not seeking your input —including but not limited to your forgiveness. El_C 14:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Unfairly Blocked

I have been unfairly blocked. The Judaism article steals away from me my ethnically Jewish heritage by saying Judaism is the religion of Jewish people. I am catholic and have many friends who are ethnically Jewish but practice Catholicism. I think something about racism should be mentioned in the article on Judaism. I also think the levitical priesthood (Cohen Levite)and documented Genocide, and blueprints for world domination, ALL of which are included in their sacred texts, should definitely be mentioned. An article about Judaism should definitely include these controversies surrounding the religion.

Anti-semitic trolling

Any more of it from you, and you will quickly find yourself blocked from editing. Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Name Calling Ignorant Administrator

Anti-semitic is an ironic word for you to use considering I have a semitic ancestry. Furthermore all Arabs are semitic and all I have done is highlight some of the negative aspects of Judaism. I read your page about the behavior of people on Misplaced Pages and quite frankly you are the one who seems prejudice and willing to label a group of people with blanket insults. You may have the upper hand now but in time truth will prevail. I have better things to do than get in a spat with you about something 99% of the world agrees with me on. Your work exudes a kind of sickening self-importance matched only by the ones you are "rescuing" from my writings.Mechelzidek (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

It's obvious you are not here to help us build an encyclopedia, but rather to spread bigotry, insult people, disrupt our project, and waste our time. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely. Antandrus (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Mechelzidek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Antandrus is deleting my entries without being willing to have a conversation about it. Antandrus called me names that aren't true just because I'm trying to balance the article on Judaism to reflect some of the notorious and universally accepted negative aspects of the religion.

Decline reason:

Edits such as this are simply not appropriate and that sort of biased hatred is not welcome here. — Yamla (talk) 20:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mechelzidek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just trying to balance out the article

Decline reason:

That wasn't adding balance. That was POV pushing. — IrishGuy 20:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mechelzidek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I didn't know such a small minority of zealous Jews were here to make sure Judaism was portrayed in a biased favorable light. Please notice I wasn't blocked for my edits but for trying to discuss them with zealous Zionists. Please don't let[REDACTED] get ruined by hyperactive Jews brainwashed by their parents into thinking their beliefs are somehow neutral. Having a "sacred text that espouses genocide and racism, along with plans for taking over the world, is certainly not a neutrally grounded topic, therefore the presentation of it to the world as neutral, is actually a bias for the self-proclaimed Jewish people. Any right minded person knowledgeable about the history of the contentiousness sparked by Judaism should realize there is a place for this in articles about Judaism. I may have went a bit overboard but that's the negotiating process is it not, shouldn't there be some discussion, shouldn't someone have to explain what is meant by the sacred texts writings? I am not afraid to be called an antisemite because it's a made up word by Jews to skirt the real issue which is globally accepted anti-Judaism. Why do Jews live by one set of rules while everybody else has to live by a different set. If I raised my son by telling him he was more special than 99% of the world simply because of his genetics, I'm sure that would give him good self-esteem and confidence to excel in the world. I nor 99% of the rest of the world do not do that because you create a monster that others have to deal with and it makes the world a less pleasant place to be in. Judaism is like a type of psychological steroid that raises it's adherents up without regard for how it will affect the other 99% of people in the game. There must be some middle ground here, too often Jews make claims about their religion that just simply are not true. For example, the Jews say that only the offspring of Jewish mothers are Jews, how can this possibly be true with the Levite/Cohen priesthood? The father carries the last name through the generations. How can a Jew explain this without being racist? The evidence suggests that among other things; they make up words, are overwhelmingly hyperactive, ignore reality, and personally attack anyone trying to document the truth. Is not the term anti-semite a very good example of this? Besides being very misleading, isn't this a form of passive aggressiveness against all the semitic people who do not practice Judaism. Misplaced Pages's own rules ban making articles about new words yet I've never heard of ethnoreligious before and sure enough the word is used to describe what a Jew is, and there's a link to an article that seems to exist only to sugarcoat the racist components of Judaism. Trying to portray religious practices as the most important common thread between Jews is patently false based on facts. Again I point to the Jewish communities request that Albert Einstein be the head of Israel despite his adamant assertion that he was agnostic. Could you imagine this happening in any other mainstream religion? What about the Jews claim that the years of being slaves in Egypt has shaped there superior morality. To any non-bias person this would seem to make sense right. However the Jews do not mention that in Judaism only Cohens or Levites can talk with god and then report their findings to the rest of the Jews banned from the priesthood. So, in actuality, a tribe of people who came from who-knows-where with morals definitely not acquired through slave hood, are the only ones who know what "god" actually wants of the rest of his people. Furthermore, 90% of the original Jews escaping Egypt, have assimilated into the rest of the world, many of them converting to Christianity. How do Jews, especially Israeli Jews, explain that these very powerful Levin/Cohen people are not included when Israel is referred to as the Jewish homeland. Unless the Jews are blatantly ignoring god's orders that "Cohen's/Levite's do not, and will never share the promised land, they have no claim to any of the land except to be able to visit certain designated areas. There is no question that Jews of all religions are great people, but the practicing Jews have placed their extreme ability for loyalty, into the hands of a royal family of priests who in god's words "share no heritage with the Jews". There is no question that swearing loyalty to these Cohen/Levites was beneficial to the Jews, especially during the exodus, however through time, much like the administrators on wikipedia, people change for the worse when given power. Swearing eternal allegiance to a specific group of people, and relying solely on them for god's messages, is a very flawed approach to life, not just because of how it affects the brainwashed, but also because of how it affects the people given such great power, and the rest of the world. I compare it to British imperialism where if the King or Queen are half intelligent (which the Levite/Cohens certainly are) then all they need is scores of knuckledraggers to swear complete allegiance even in the face of death, and voila you have a recipe for disaster. After much, much reading and thought this is how I see it. I am not filled with hate, I am not a bigot, I am not a racist, I am honest to a fault and will say that I am anti-Judaism. I am anti-Judaism yet the extent of my acting upon these feelings is minimal with sporadic online conversations spread over many years, waiting for someone to talk about these issues in a rational manner, and perhaps show me why I'm wrong without using made up Jew words. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't know such a small minority of zealous Jews were here to make sure Judaism was portrayed in a biased favorable light. Please notice I wasn't blocked for my edits but for trying to discuss them with zealous Zionists. Please don't let[REDACTED] get ruined by hyperactive Jews brainwashed by their parents into thinking their beliefs are somehow neutral. Having a "sacred text that espouses genocide and racism, along with plans for taking over the world, is certainly not a neutrally grounded topic, therefore the presentation of it to the world as neutral, is actually a bias for the self-proclaimed Jewish people. Any right minded person knowledgeable about the history of the contentiousness sparked by Judaism should realize there is a place for this in articles about Judaism. I may have went a bit overboard but that's the negotiating process is it not, shouldn't there be some discussion, shouldn't someone have to explain what is meant by the sacred texts writings? I am not afraid to be called an antisemite because it's a made up word by Jews to skirt the real issue which is globally accepted anti-Judaism. Why do Jews live by one set of rules while everybody else has to live by a different set. If I raised my son by telling him he was more special than 99% of the world simply because of his genetics, I'm sure that would give him good self-esteem and confidence to excel in the world. I nor 99% of the rest of the world do not do that because you create a monster that others have to deal with and it makes the world a less pleasant place to be in. Judaism is like a type of psychological steroid that raises it's adherents up without regard for how it will affect the other 99% of people in the game. There must be some middle ground here, too often Jews make claims about their religion that just simply are not true. For example, the Jews say that only the offspring of Jewish mothers are Jews, how can this possibly be true with the Levite/Cohen priesthood? The father carries the last name through the generations. How can a Jew explain this without being racist? The evidence suggests that among other things; they make up words, are overwhelmingly hyperactive, ignore reality, and personally attack anyone trying to document the truth. Is not the term anti-semite a very good example of this? Besides being very misleading, isn't this a form of passive aggressiveness against all the semitic people who do not practice Judaism. Misplaced Pages's own rules ban making articles about new words yet I've never heard of ethnoreligious before and sure enough the word is used to describe what a Jew is, and there's a link to an article that seems to exist only to sugarcoat the racist components of Judaism. Trying to portray religious practices as the most important common thread between Jews is patently false based on facts. Again I point to the Jewish communities request that Albert Einstein be the head of Israel despite his adamant assertion that he was agnostic. Could you imagine this happening in any other mainstream religion? What about the Jews claim that the years of being slaves in Egypt has shaped there superior morality. To any non-bias person this would seem to make sense right. However the Jews do not mention that in Judaism only Cohens or Levites can talk with god and then report their findings to the rest of the Jews banned from the priesthood. So, in actuality, a tribe of people who came from who-knows-where with morals definitely not acquired through slave hood, are the only ones who know what "god" actually wants of the rest of his people. Furthermore, 90% of the original Jews escaping Egypt, have assimilated into the rest of the world, many of them converting to Christianity. How do Jews, especially Israeli Jews, explain that these very powerful Levin/Cohen people are not included when Israel is referred to as the Jewish homeland. Unless the Jews are blatantly ignoring god's orders that "Cohen's/Levite's do not, and will never share the promised land, they have no claim to any of the land except to be able to visit certain designated areas. There is no question that Jews of all religions are great people, but the practicing Jews have placed their extreme ability for loyalty, into the hands of a royal family of priests who in god's words "share no heritage with the Jews". There is no question that swearing loyalty to these Cohen/Levites was beneficial to the Jews, especially during the exodus, however through time, much like the administrators on wikipedia, people change for the worse when given power. Swearing eternal allegiance to a specific group of people, and relying solely on them for god's messages, is a very flawed approach to life, not just because of how it affects the brainwashed, but also because of how it affects the people given such great power, and the rest of the world. I compare it to British imperialism where if the King or Queen are half intelligent (which the Levite/Cohens certainly are) then all they need is scores of knuckledraggers to swear complete allegiance even in the face of death, and voila you have a recipe for disaster. After much, much reading and thought this is how I see it. I am not filled with hate, I am not a bigot, I am not a racist, I am honest to a fault and will say that I am anti-Judaism. I am anti-Judaism yet the extent of my acting upon these feelings is minimal with sporadic online conversations spread over many years, waiting for someone to talk about these issues in a rational manner, and perhaps show me why I'm wrong without using made up Jew words. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't know such a small minority of zealous Jews were here to make sure Judaism was portrayed in a biased favorable light. Please notice I wasn't blocked for my edits but for trying to discuss them with zealous Zionists. Please don't let[REDACTED] get ruined by hyperactive Jews brainwashed by their parents into thinking their beliefs are somehow neutral. Having a "sacred text that espouses genocide and racism, along with plans for taking over the world, is certainly not a neutrally grounded topic, therefore the presentation of it to the world as neutral, is actually a bias for the self-proclaimed Jewish people. Any right minded person knowledgeable about the history of the contentiousness sparked by Judaism should realize there is a place for this in articles about Judaism. I may have went a bit overboard but that's the negotiating process is it not, shouldn't there be some discussion, shouldn't someone have to explain what is meant by the sacred texts writings? I am not afraid to be called an antisemite because it's a made up word by Jews to skirt the real issue which is globally accepted anti-Judaism. Why do Jews live by one set of rules while everybody else has to live by a different set. If I raised my son by telling him he was more special than 99% of the world simply because of his genetics, I'm sure that would give him good self-esteem and confidence to excel in the world. I nor 99% of the rest of the world do not do that because you create a monster that others have to deal with and it makes the world a less pleasant place to be in. Judaism is like a type of psychological steroid that raises it's adherents up without regard for how it will affect the other 99% of people in the game. There must be some middle ground here, too often Jews make claims about their religion that just simply are not true. For example, the Jews say that only the offspring of Jewish mothers are Jews, how can this possibly be true with the Levite/Cohen priesthood? The father carries the last name through the generations. How can a Jew explain this without being racist? The evidence suggests that among other things; they make up words, are overwhelmingly hyperactive, ignore reality, and personally attack anyone trying to document the truth. Is not the term anti-semite a very good example of this? Besides being very misleading, isn't this a form of passive aggressiveness against all the semitic people who do not practice Judaism. Misplaced Pages's own rules ban making articles about new words yet I've never heard of ethnoreligious before and sure enough the word is used to describe what a Jew is, and there's a link to an article that seems to exist only to sugarcoat the racist components of Judaism. Trying to portray religious practices as the most important common thread between Jews is patently false based on facts. Again I point to the Jewish communities request that Albert Einstein be the head of Israel despite his adamant assertion that he was agnostic. Could you imagine this happening in any other mainstream religion? What about the Jews claim that the years of being slaves in Egypt has shaped there superior morality. To any non-bias person this would seem to make sense right. However the Jews do not mention that in Judaism only Cohens or Levites can talk with god and then report their findings to the rest of the Jews banned from the priesthood. So, in actuality, a tribe of people who came from who-knows-where with morals definitely not acquired through slave hood, are the only ones who know what "god" actually wants of the rest of his people. Furthermore, 90% of the original Jews escaping Egypt, have assimilated into the rest of the world, many of them converting to Christianity. How do Jews, especially Israeli Jews, explain that these very powerful Levin/Cohen people are not included when Israel is referred to as the Jewish homeland. Unless the Jews are blatantly ignoring god's orders that "Cohen's/Levite's do not, and will never share the promised land, they have no claim to any of the land except to be able to visit certain designated areas. There is no question that Jews of all religions are great people, but the practicing Jews have placed their extreme ability for loyalty, into the hands of a royal family of priests who in god's words "share no heritage with the Jews". There is no question that swearing loyalty to these Cohen/Levites was beneficial to the Jews, especially during the exodus, however through time, much like the administrators on wikipedia, people change for the worse when given power. Swearing eternal allegiance to a specific group of people, and relying solely on them for god's messages, is a very flawed approach to life, not just because of how it affects the brainwashed, but also because of how it affects the people given such great power, and the rest of the world. I compare it to British imperialism where if the King or Queen are half intelligent (which the Levite/Cohens certainly are) then all they need is scores of knuckledraggers to swear complete allegiance even in the face of death, and voila you have a recipe for disaster. After much, much reading and thought this is how I see it. I am not filled with hate, I am not a bigot, I am not a racist, I am honest to a fault and will say that I am anti-Judaism. I am anti-Judaism yet the extent of my acting upon these feelings is minimal with sporadic online conversations spread over many years, waiting for someone to talk about these issues in a rational manner, and perhaps show me why I'm wrong without using made up Jew words. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock