| Revision as of 04:26, 20 March 2008 view sourceJayron32 (talk | contribs)105,509 edits →Thank you!: come on...← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:30, 20 March 2008 view source RHaworth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users118,796 edits →Thank you!: not attackNext edit → | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
| * Glad you noticed. Now I won't need to leave you a message. I was just about to caution you about the title when someone tagged the article as an attack page. I saw the title, thought it might be attack but actually went to the trouble of reading it. But to be on the safe side, I have move it to ] - CharAss stands for ''character assassinations''. I have had ] for ages so no-one should object to yours. -- ] (] | ]) 04:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC) | * Glad you noticed. Now I won't need to leave you a message. I was just about to caution you about the title when someone tagged the article as an attack page. I saw the title, thought it might be attack but actually went to the trouble of reading it. But to be on the safe side, I have move it to ] - CharAss stands for ''character assassinations''. I have had ] for ages so no-one should object to yours. -- ] (] | ]) 04:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| **] covers this quite well... From that page, and I quote, "a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad that some user ever did" is not constructive or appropriate. " If you feel this is an appropriate page, I will not wheel-war over this, but clearly, regardless of the name, one should not mainatain such lists for any good reason... --].].] 04:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC) | **] covers this quite well... From that page, and I quote, "a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad that some user ever did" is not constructive or appropriate. " If you feel this is an appropriate page, I will not wheel-war over this, but clearly, regardless of the name, one should not mainatain such lists for any good reason... --].].] 04:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| * I do not think it is an attack page. The wording is far milder than than the many newbie-biting things that I have written! -- ] (] | ]) 04:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:30, 20 March 2008
Archives
| Up to: | ||||
OS grid key Ireland.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:OS_grid_key_Ireland.gif. -- Rettetast (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
How Television Works
You meant content fork, I assume. I think strangling the entire article at birth is a little harsh; it's impossible for others to edit or discuss the content if they can't find it. I've reinstated it, with a merge-multiple tag and a discussion starter on Talk:Technology of television. Can you let others read it and have a say before deleting it again, please? IanHarvey (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
speedy deletion
it wasn't an archive or a test, it was merely a place to get the discussion out of the way of the general forum, because it was becoming far too long. speedy deletion(talk) 08:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- I haven't the faintest idea what you are talking about. Try creating links! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I have a response to your comment on this page http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Thesaturnine Hope you can answer my further questions there. Thanks sully (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Cab spam
I got a problem for "speedy deletion"... In fact, My first level title was wrong and i was not able to change it, so i deleted the page and recreated it... Then i got your message....
Is'it possible to do something please ? -- User:ludovic19
- Yes. What you should do is go away and stop trying to advertise - see WP:SPAM. When your company becomes notable in the English-speaking world, someone will write the article for you. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand... This was a description article of the company which has got subsidiaries in all the world, and not an advertising. (I tried to do the same as Intermec, is this article an advertising? Because i tried to do the same thing) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludovic19 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- You did not do the same as Intermec! How many times does the Intermec article have the word "our"! It also has a link to the company's website that works. It does not matter to me how notable the company is, you clearly have a COI so you should keep away. Sorry. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok you are right, i assume the fact that i did not take the time to read completely the wikipedia policy and goals...
Can i rewrite the article without using " advertising " language but only with a neutral language like the Intermec article ? sry again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludovic19 (talk • contribs)
- I repeat, I say: leave it to others. But if you want to try, I will not stop you. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok thank you for your help and advices, i can only do better now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludovic19 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
the Joël Bellassen index
I actually moved it to the Wikiversity. You can suggest a better place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulstrialhaha (talk • contribs) 09:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you!
For moving my user subpage to the proper title. I didn't realize that typo had happened till after you moved it. Thanks! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 04:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Glad you noticed. Now I won't need to leave you a message. I was just about to caution you about the title when someone tagged the article as an attack page. I saw the title, thought it might be attack but actually went to the trouble of reading it. But to be on the safe side, I have move it to User:Wilhelmina Will/CharAss - CharAss stands for character assassinations. I have had User:RHaworth/CharAss for ages so no-one should object to yours. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- WP:ATP covers this quite well... From that page, and I quote, "a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad that some user ever did" is not constructive or appropriate. " If you feel this is an appropriate page, I will not wheel-war over this, but clearly, regardless of the name, one should not mainatain such lists for any good reason... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- I do not think it is an attack page. The wording is far milder than than the many newbie-biting things that I have written! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)