Misplaced Pages

42

Did you make it into the cabal? Basketball110 22:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

help me!

{{helpme|Can someone make a scrollbox on my userpage for my awards?}} -- Ketchup Krew 23:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there! You can use the scroll box template to make scroll boxes - I'll leave it up to you to decide how you want it to look. Happy editing! Ale_Jrb 00:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Ketchup ala Award

User:ComputerGuy890100/HiddenLinkAward pUT THIS CODE IN YOUR aWARDS SECTION OR ON YOUR USERPAGE. tHANKS!

Code:{{User:ComputerGuy890100/HiddenLinkAward|Ketchup}}

ComputerGuy890100_Polls 23:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

GuestBook

Good Job finding my secret page but...You forgot to sign my guestbook! Please sign it. Click on Guest Book on this userbox:

--RyRy5 (talk) 00:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Secret Page

One more page to go... microchip08 (find my secret page!) 15:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations. I must now request that you give me some feedback about my quest, and that you add your barnstar so that other people can see it & have a go.... microchip08 Talk to me! I feel lonely! 20:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Screambox

Please don't make personal attacks against other editors on Screambox. I'm not being "politically correct", just simply "correct". What you are doing is not its purpose and the attacks are not welcome there or on any other Misplaced Pages page. I'm sorry you're stressed out. I suggest hitting the little "x" in the upper right corner of your monitor so as not to get yourself blocked. Or at least read the top half of Screambox so you can see what is acceptable there. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem man, it looks like you're having a bad day. Been there. Screambox (which I co-created, therefore not politically correct), is supposed to make you feel better and help you regain your composure. However, if all it did was make you angrier, I recommend not editing screambox anymore. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/224jeff6 block

See the above link. You've been blocked one week for disruptive editing. I strongly suggest the you take the time to learn wiki policies and abide by them. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

Ketchup krew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I was blocked for something I didn't do. At first I was suspected as a sockpuppet of 224jeff6. But instead of that, I was blocked for making disruptive edits to my case page. On the page, the blocker, User:Rlevse, gave false information on in the conclusion section. He said that the most convincing thing is the edit 224jeff6 made when he was in the hospital. (You might need to read the sockpuppetry case to make complete of this.) No edits were made by 224jeff6 when he was in the hospital. I did, on my account, Ketchup krew. And the sockpuppet case listed me as the sockpuppetee and 224jeff6 as the master, but 224jeff6 was blocked for being the sockpuppetee. Also, my account didn't get a proper template to explain the block. And I don't even know what edit is being interpreted as beng disruptive. I was never told. I think this block was done all wrong. I really need an administrator to look this over. Also, account creation has been blocked. Is this permanent, or just for the length of the block?

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for disruption for one week, and this seems to be justified and largely unrelated to the sockpuppet abuse case. Persons abusing multiple accounts are typically blocked indefinately, and the block notes that this 1-week block was for disruption and not sockpuppetry. Also, your question about creating new accounts during the block shows that you have clear intent to create a new account while blocked, i.e. to run an illegal sockpuppet account... — Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ketchup Krew 19:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, my userpage has been replaced with a sockpuppet suspect template. Will I ever be able to restore it (not the template but everything else that was there) or will I have to make it again? -- Ketchup Krew 20:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Ketchup krew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I was blocked for something I didn't do. At first I was suspected as a sockpuppet of 224jeff6. But instead of that, I was blocked for making disruptive edits to my case page. On the page, the blocker, User:Rlevse, gave false information on in the conclusion section. He said that the most convincing thing is the edit 224jeff6 made when he was in the hospital. (You might need to read the sockpuppetry case to make complete of this.) No edits were made by 224jeff6 when he was in the hospital. I did, on my account, Ketchup krew. And the sockpuppet case listed me as the sockpuppetee and 224jeff6 as the master, but 224jeff6 was blocked for being the sockpuppetee. Also, my account didn't get a proper template to explain the block. And I don't even know what edit is being interpreted as beng disruptive. I was never told. I think this block was done all wrong. I really need an administrator to look this over. Also, account creation has been blocked. Is this permanent, or just for the length of the block?

Decline reason:

Your contributions suggest otherwise — Suspected Drunk Driver (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admin, see Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/224jeff6. If not socks, they're meats. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I concur that this person is likely one in the same, BUT doesn't seem to have broken any rules, attempted to circumvent a block (if I missed that one please show me where because I didn't see that on the evidence page), or has been disruptive. Again, diffs to the contrary would be useful, but I do not feel this block has been properly placed (it is not against Misplaced Pages policy to have two accounts, per se). — BQZip01 —  01:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

You're missing the whole point about the disruption, see the first decline too. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)