| Revision as of 03:42, 21 March 2008 editMcJeff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,482 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:19, 21 March 2008 edit undoRobJ1981 (talk | contribs)32,546 edits List of characters in BullyNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| # ] | # ] | ||
| </div><!--Template:Archivebox ends--> | </div><!--Template:Archivebox ends--> | ||
| ==List of characters in Bully== | |||
| You and Dan need to settle down and stop nitpicking many edits to the article. The section called: new people stopping by to edit (February 2008) was uncivil. In that section, you stated "I'm going to make it policy to delete all the tags put up by driveby editors", which is also uncivil. As I stated in that section: people can place tags and not discuss things, it's not a crime. Stop being overprotective over the article, just because tags are placed and the editor doesn't discuss. Discuss the tag on talk, then if it's not needed: remove AFTER discussion, not beforehand. Then there is the whole villain/nemesis nonsense. One word shouldn't be such a big deal. Just because a source uses that word, doesn't mean the article must have it listed the same way. Further article controlling will force me to make a discussion at an admin notice board about this. You and Dan watch the page/obsess with it a bit too much, and it certainly needs to stop. ] (]) 23:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:19, 21 March 2008
List of characters in Bully
You and Dan need to settle down and stop nitpicking many edits to the article. The section called: new people stopping by to edit (February 2008) was uncivil. In that section, you stated "I'm going to make it policy to delete all the tags put up by driveby editors", which is also uncivil. As I stated in that section: people can place tags and not discuss things, it's not a crime. Stop being overprotective over the article, just because tags are placed and the editor doesn't discuss. Discuss the tag on talk, then if it's not needed: remove AFTER discussion, not beforehand. Then there is the whole villain/nemesis nonsense. One word shouldn't be such a big deal. Just because a source uses that word, doesn't mean the article must have it listed the same way. Further article controlling will force me to make a discussion at an admin notice board about this. You and Dan watch the page/obsess with it a bit too much, and it certainly needs to stop. RobJ1981 (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)