| Revision as of 17:18, 1 April 2008 editKww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits Undid revision 202584903 by 70.108.103.64 (talk)restoring material deleted by blocked user← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:19, 1 April 2008 edit undoHello Control (talk | contribs)Rollbackers11,969 edits →WP:BLP: resp.Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Note the emphasis on any. I don't know the content of the removed material, but if it fails ], it shouldn't be on a talk page the same as it shouldn't be on an article page. --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 17:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | Note the emphasis on any. I don't know the content of the removed material, but if it fails ], it shouldn't be on a talk page the same as it shouldn't be on an article page. --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 17:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Thank You. The content doesnt fail. The contest was various things: |
:Thank You. The content doesnt fail. The contest was various things: info on her risque oral sex inuendo music vid ( she did ). So why is sensoring this true info allowed? ] (]) 17:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Another comment from the very top of ] -- some emphasis added | :Another comment from the very top of ] -- some emphasis added | ||
| :''"Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Misplaced Pages articles, '''talk pages''', user pages, and project space."'' | :''"Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Misplaced Pages articles, '''talk pages''', user pages, and project space."'' | ||
| :There you go. It says to remove them, even from talk pages, without discussion. If you want to discuss replacing them, I don't see that being a problem...but if there are valid BLP concerns, you're going to need sources just to talk about them. --]]] 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | :There you go. It says to remove them, even from talk pages, without discussion. If you want to discuss replacing them, I don't see that being a problem...but if there are valid BLP concerns, you're going to need sources just to talk about them. --]]] 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::The content ''does'' fail—it is unsourced and contested. If you can find a ] reference from a ] then it can be replaced. By the way, you have no idea what that word mean, apparently. —<font color="007FFF">]</font> <sup><font color="FF0000">]</font></sup> 17:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == April 2008 == | == April 2008 == | ||
Revision as of 17:19, 1 April 2008
 Welcome!Last edited:Last edited by:17:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Hello Control (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Cassie
I posted a direct quote from WP:BLP that says unsourced/contested content should be "removed immediately" from talk pages as well as articles. Why are you still questioning this? Also, the Feb. version you keep reverting to actually has more stuff censored than the version I made yesterday, where I also "signed" unsigned comments so the redacted content can be easily found in the edit history. —Hello, Control 16:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Blocked User
You are a blocked user. Your block from yesterday has not expired. You aren't permitted to edit anything on this page or on the Cassie talk page at all. That's why I undo your edits.Kww (talk) 17:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:BLP
You asked for help on this. One of the first lines of WP:BLP states;
Editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Misplaced Pages page.
Note the emphasis on any. I don't know the content of the removed material, but if it fails WP:BLP, it shouldn't be on a talk page the same as it shouldn't be on an article page. --Escape Orbit 17:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You. The content doesnt fail. The contest was various things: info on her risque oral sex inuendo music vid ( she did ). So why is sensoring this true info allowed? 70.108.103.64 (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Another comment from the very top of WP:BLP -- some emphasis added
- "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Misplaced Pages articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space."
- There you go. It says to remove them, even from talk pages, without discussion. If you want to discuss replacing them, I don't see that being a problem...but if there are valid BLP concerns, you're going to need sources just to talk about them. --Onorem♠Dil 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- The content does fail—it is unsourced and contested. If you can find a verifiable reference from a reliable source then it can be replaced. By the way, you have no idea what that word mean, apparently. —Hello, Control 17:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TRAVELLINGCARITell me yours 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.