Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:53, 5 April 2008

DYK congratulations

On 20 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ernest Beaux, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>° 01:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

You are very welcome - I must admit I am not sure that I know who you are (i.e. if I knew you under your old username). If you want to email me, my email link is enabled. If not, no problem. In any case, welcome back and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>° 04:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, glad to see you back and thanks for letting me know. Take care, Ruhrfisch _><>° 02:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Yummm - thanks for the cookie! Ruhrfisch _><>° 00:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Day of Spring!

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~

Seth Maberry

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Seth Maberry, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not and Misplaced Pages:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Madeye777

Why have you decided to go from no warnings to level 4? Notices of speedy deletion do not count as warnings, I would suggest using an 'im' template if you want to do it immediately. That is only, however, if you have some evidence they are acting under bad faith, otherwise I would suggest using an earlier template. αѕєηιηє /_c 06:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

He has no vandalism notices, but yes, I see what you mean. I suppose it could be construed as 'subtle vandalism', and that is possible, but going from none to a four should only be done when banning needs to be done imminently - like if the editor is utilizing automated tools to vandalise the wiki or whatever, and it needs to be stopped quickly to undo their vandalism. I strongly urge you to turn it down to a level 3, but it is your choice. αѕєηιηє /_c 06:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

It's editors like yourself who don't take offence to others raising concerns that make Misplaced Pages such a great place. Have a nice day! :) αѕєηιηє /_c 06:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Big Three csd

no problem. I tend towards the guideline at WP:HOAX#Dealing with hoaxes and the notation about hoaxes under WP:CSD#G1 although the reality is that hoaxes do get speedied by other admins. good luck – Zedla (talk) 07:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

ChaosBaby (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for the cookie. Just wanted to stop by and let you know how I am getting on, actually I am still having a few problems, this time i keep getting tagged for Vandalism but I have NO idea why!? All i have been doing is looking at articles and reading my messages and looking at html in similar articles to get ideas of how to write a wiki.

Hopefully will all get sorted soon. Thanks for not deleting my article. Ijust re-wrote my Carolena Nericcio article also, just waiting to see if that one gets tagged for anything or not. I bet they will find something i have done wrong and boot me off again, lol Oh well, I will get there in the end :) Enjoy your cookie :) ChaosBaby (talk) 02:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Nano technology and medicine

Just pointing out to you that the blatent copyvio tag you added here was inaccurate because the article on science daily was lifted from wikipedia. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 07:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Jehuu Caulcrick article

well, I was able to get done early! still substantial facts can be added to it, from source #1, which is nearly an encyclopedia article on it's own. It's a stub right now, but i still have some additional info to add. LukeTheSpook (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• I'll have plenty new articles now, i just installed HIGH SPEED INTERNET! PHEW! finally. wikipedia loads instantly. no more dialup!. this is great. LukeTheSpook (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Message

Comment

Hey, this comment is kinda well you know. Probably not the best idea. Tiptoety 01:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, no worries, we all do it. Cheers, Tiptoety 01:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm confused. Where was the other side of the conversation? I was looking at your talk page, and I didn't see replies from the user/vandal. Enigmaman (talk) 02:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The replies from me? Uhh...well I am not a vandal, but they are on my talk page. Tiptoety 02:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

nah, the replies from the vandal. The conversation that you were talking about. "Go ahead..." was in reply to? I saw your conversation. I was talking about the convo that spurred the convo. Enigmaman (talk) 03:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandal

See Diff Jeepday (talk) 03:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

It's there now. Enigmaman (talk) 03:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Jo Wiltshire

No problem. I submitted the article for AFD. You may give your opinion on it's inclusion/deletion here. Jauerback/_dude. 21:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)