| Revision as of 18:32, 9 April 2008 editRevolving Bugbear (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,923 edits →apologies: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:48, 9 April 2008 edit undoTwaz (talk | contribs)1,867 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| Cheers! - ] 18:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | Cheers! - ] 18:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Huggle == | |||
| Yeah, I tried to apply the tag and explain more. But, everytime I clicked on the screen with the App it applied the tag, like 3 or 4 times. So I had to remove it from some other pages manually. I do think we should rename the article though. Just because of the age appropriateness and the chances that a kid is going to search for it. Thought I'd throw that out there. --'''] 21:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::yeah, i don't know what to say. i was acting in good faith. just zooming through articles. it added the tag at least 3 times to that page, so i had to kill the process and restart. now i'm giving the huggle a break and trying to find the syntax line that generated the problem. and i wasn't attacking another editor, i was pointing out the obvious nature of his statement. i know the policies, there's no need to revert my talk page twice in order to make a point. your first message was enough. its amazing this amount of hostility over trying to protect the encyclopedic quality of ]. --'''] 21:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::17, hahahaha. --'''] 21:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I actually undid several of those warnings. I also undid your revision. If you have a problem with ClueBot's revision, please notify ClueBot and report the false positive. I'm sure I don't need to warn you about vandalism, as you were just acting in good faith. However, gunning me down with warnings is not adhering to a NPOV. And threatning me doesn't work, especially when you're in High School kido. So keep up the good work, but if you're going to go after me you might want to get a third opinion next time. Thanks! --'''] 21:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:48, 9 April 2008
Silly Question
Ok......So this might be a silly question, which probably doesn't have anything to do with contributing to Misplaced Pages...........but you know how on your user page there is that yellow bar on top that has links to other places that have to do with you, yeah uhhh..., how do you get that? Sorry, really silly and unnecesary question!--Obaidz96 (talk) 22:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You! I'll work on it on my sandbox. --Obaidz96 (talk) 03:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Re:Admin coaching
Sure, I think I can coach you. My methods have updated, been improved, and expanded. I guess I'll see you at User:Scetoaux/Admin coaching! Malinaccier (talk) 01:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
And no cheating on the questions you've seen on my subpage =P.
- LOL. I answered the questions. :) — scetoaux (T/C) 01:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Disgusted
He and his random sock puppet ip adresses have called me a nigger and a black bastard and all he gets is a temp block, check talk page history all the numbers are similar, hes stalking me and being a bigot. Oh im going to go crazy in a minute. Realist2 (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
A report was already made a few days ago by another editer, ill send you the link in a minute, when i find it. Realist2 (talk) 01:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
here - i think their all from the same person, he said in one of his edit summarys that by turning his connection on and off he gets a new number or something. Realist2 (talk) 01:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Alex Hall
Did you mean to add a speedy deletion tag to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Alex Hall? Did you want to withdraw the nomination or were you intending to add it to the article? --Canley (talk) 01:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
apologies
Please accept my apologies for all but disappearing. I was slammed with a sudden unexpected insanity in The Real World (70-hour work weeks and all the stuff of nightmares). Life has provisionally returned to normal. I see you've got yourself set up Maliaccier, who I'm sure will be extremely helpful. If I can help in any way, now or in the future, with something (admin-related or not), please let me know.
Again, I apologize for my flakiness. Silly Real World, not knowing its place ...
Cheers! - Revolving Bugbear 18:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Huggle
Yeah, I tried to apply the tag and explain more. But, everytime I clicked on the screen with the App it applied the tag, like 3 or 4 times. So I had to remove it from some other pages manually. I do think we should rename the article though. Just because of the age appropriateness and the chances that a kid is going to search for it. Thought I'd throw that out there. --InvisibleDiplomat66 21:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- yeah, i don't know what to say. i was acting in good faith. just zooming through articles. it added the tag at least 3 times to that page, so i had to kill the process and restart. now i'm giving the huggle a break and trying to find the syntax line that generated the problem. and i wasn't attacking another editor, i was pointing out the obvious nature of his statement. i know the policies, there's no need to revert my talk page twice in order to make a point. your first message was enough. its amazing this amount of hostility over trying to protect the encyclopedic quality of Wiki. --InvisibleDiplomat66 21:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- 17, hahahaha. --InvisibleDiplomat66 21:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I actually undid several of those warnings. I also undid your revision. If you have a problem with ClueBot's revision, please notify ClueBot and report the false positive. I'm sure I don't need to warn you about vandalism, as you were just acting in good faith. However, gunning me down with warnings is not adhering to a NPOV. And threatning me doesn't work, especially when you're in High School kido. So keep up the good work, but if you're going to go after me you might want to get a third opinion next time. Thanks! --InvisibleDiplomat66 21:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- 17, hahahaha. --InvisibleDiplomat66 21:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- yeah, i don't know what to say. i was acting in good faith. just zooming through articles. it added the tag at least 3 times to that page, so i had to kill the process and restart. now i'm giving the huggle a break and trying to find the syntax line that generated the problem. and i wasn't attacking another editor, i was pointing out the obvious nature of his statement. i know the policies, there's no need to revert my talk page twice in order to make a point. your first message was enough. its amazing this amount of hostility over trying to protect the encyclopedic quality of Wiki. --InvisibleDiplomat66 21:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)