| Revision as of 01:21, 14 April 2008 editAmoruso (talk | contribs)13,357 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:31, 14 April 2008 edit undoPocopocopocopoco (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,882 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :we don't. it's enough to say that it's non binding. it's not under chapter 7. not complicated. ] (]) 01:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | :we don't. it's enough to say that it's non binding. it's not under chapter 7. not complicated. ] (]) 01:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::I have a concern about making any sort of assertion that it's non-binding when the International Court of Justice says that it is binding. ] (]) 01:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:31, 14 April 2008
Long discussion of whether resolution is binding or not
I fail to see why we need to put in individual opinions from non-notable people into this article as to whether this resolution is binding or not. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- we don't. it's enough to say that it's non binding. it's not under chapter 7. not complicated. Amoruso (talk) 01:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have a concern about making any sort of assertion that it's non-binding when the International Court of Justice says that it is binding. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)