| Revision as of 07:18, 16 April 2008 editMiszaBot II (talk | contribs)259,776 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 48h) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Archive 3.← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:58, 17 April 2008 edit undoHoary (talk | contribs)Administrators77,988 edits cultural iconographyNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| How do I get my name on a task force list? Thanks ] (]) 03:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC) | How do I get my name on a task force list? Thanks ] (]) 03:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==cultural iconography== | |||
| The article on the hapless ] not only finishes with breathless tittle-tattle about some porno flick but also starts off with a breathless listing of her "iconic" statuses. Among these earnestly linked buzzphrases, "]" seemed particularly bizarre and so I clicked the link. In a word, "ugh". Surely the phrase is "philosophical" in the sense of being the object of investigation of philosophy, and more specifically of ]. Could somebody whose eyes, unlike mine, don't immediately glaze at the sight of words such as "iconic" take a look at this stuff? (I've written comments on its talk page.) | |||
| If this really does seem beyond the pale for philosophy, then <s>ask yourselves why you list Carl Jung among your good articles</s> then feel free to move this somewhere less unsuitable. -- ] (]) 10:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:58, 17 April 2008
Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Announcements
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Intuition
There is a discussion on Talk:Intuition about converting the current dab page into a primary topic and moving the dab to Intuition (disambiguation). Since this concerns Intuition (philosophy), a philosophy-related article, your thoughts on the talk page linked above are welcome. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
"Purpose"
The article titled purpose could probably use some attention from someone schooled in philosophy. Michael Hardy (talk) 01:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Family resemblance
I have just started a rewrite of this article which I feel will have to be fairly extensive. Would appreciate any help anyone can offer.A 44 will get you 99 (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Subjective logic
I was just looking at the subjective logic page and was left going "HUH??" Is there any way we can simplify it and have less formulaic jargon so it makes more sense? Also it appears to use material from only one author (although several sources by the same author are used). Should there be more extensive referencing? Thanks. Kristamaranatha (talk) 03:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Quick question
How do I get my name on a task force list? Thanks Kristamaranatha (talk) 03:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
cultural iconography
The article on the hapless Marilyn Monroe not only finishes with breathless tittle-tattle about some porno flick but also starts off with a breathless listing of her "iconic" statuses. Among these earnestly linked buzzphrases, "cultural icon" seemed particularly bizarre and so I clicked the link. In a word, "ugh". Surely the phrase is "philosophical" in the sense of being the object of investigation of philosophy, and more specifically of a particular work by Harry Frankfurt. Could somebody whose eyes, unlike mine, don't immediately glaze at the sight of words such as "iconic" take a look at this stuff? (I've written comments on its talk page.)
If this really does seem beyond the pale for philosophy, then ask yourselves why you list Carl Jung among your good articles then feel free to move this somewhere less unsuitable. -- Hoary (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)