| Revision as of 22:56, 4 May 2008 editBlechnic (talk | contribs)3,540 edits →The block← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:58, 4 May 2008 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits Undid revision 210200555 by Blechnic (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| '''As I pointed out, I was discussing my concerns with the article on the talk page, when I was blocked, not whatever the hell Ruoyung is coming to bash me about now. Cut it out. You get your say, you get your article, you get your administrative right to bully, and I get blocked. Isn't that enough for you? What do you want?''' | '''As I pointed out, I was discussing my concerns with the article on the talk page, when I was blocked, not whatever the hell Ruoyung is coming to bash me about now. Cut it out. You get your say, you get your article, you get your administrative right to bully, and I get blocked. Isn't that enough for you? What do you want?''' | ||
| == Your block == | |||
| It expires in the next 12 hours. You were never permanently blocked, as you state above. However, your acerbic attitude is still an issue. You were asked to stop. You didn't. You requested to be unblocked, you weren't but its length was cut in half. If you edit Misplaced Pages, you will meet editors who disagree with you. How you react to that determines whether or not you will be a great asset to the project. If this is how you react to disagreements, then maybe you are not cut out for Misplaced Pages.—] (]) 22:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == The block == | == The block == | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 4 May 2008
Punitively and permanently blocked for discussing edits on the talk page, edits that other editors agree with, or edits that etablished editors could offer no contraindicating evidence for not allowing.
Because the polices can be used against me, and I am not allowed to edit by policy, this block is not just punitive, but permanent. A user cannot be expected to know which policies apply and which don't, but since this is required on Misplaced Pages it effectively means that it can be used against any new editors that one disagrees with simply by getting a like-minded gang of editors to do the same thing.
But what's accuracy, when someone can show that what they think "looks" okay is better than what the Misplaced Pages community decided is policy? What's accuracy, when you can be blocked by an administrator for questioning something that goes against Misplaced Pages policy?
The administrator who blocked me did so because he was supporting the editors who did not have any policy matters to quote or any reliable sources to use for the article. While I was discussing why the source was unreliable, my arguments were being met with comments like, "Let it go." Clearly, with these editors having no reliable sources, and being unable to come up with any, and unable to read the German source (which doesn't quite agree with the article), the administrator had to block me to support his established Misplaced Pages editors.
I was blocked because I could discuss my edits, but no one else could.
And that is not just punitive, but petty, and against policy.
And now the blocking administrator is sorry he dragged an established editor into this mess and has apologized to the editor who was edit warring and reverting me.
Not suprised by that, though.
And
As I pointed out, I was discussing my concerns with the article on the talk page, when I was blocked, not whatever the hell Ruoyung is coming to bash me about now. Cut it out. You get your say, you get your article, you get your administrative right to bully, and I get blocked. Isn't that enough for you? What do you want?
Your block
It expires in the next 12 hours. You were never permanently blocked, as you state above. However, your acerbic attitude is still an issue. You were asked to stop. You didn't. You requested to be unblocked, you weren't but its length was cut in half. If you edit Misplaced Pages, you will meet editors who disagree with you. How you react to that determines whether or not you will be a great asset to the project. If this is how you react to disagreements, then maybe you are not cut out for Misplaced Pages.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
The block
The block was entirely punitive, now another administrator comes to my talk page and brags about the abuse of administrative powers that can and does go on on Misplaced Pages by bragging that the block was punitive. Yes, I know, nothing can be done about it. Administrators can do whatever they want. And get away with it. Cut it out, already. Go find some other new editor to bully out of Misplaced Pages.
And apparently administrators get to harass their victims and taunt them. Wow.