| Revision as of 22:59, 4 May 2008 editBlechnic (talk | contribs)3,540 edits →Your block: wow, you really can do whatever you want can't you? that's why you threw your administrative weight around in the edit summary: to warn me you would← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:00, 4 May 2008 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits →Your blockNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| This is not taunting. This is a plain message to you. If you would not be so defensive, read it. I am saying when you do get unblocked, please take what I am saying as constructive criticism. You are a great writer, but your "bedside manner" needs work.—] (]) 23:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == The block == | == The block == | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 4 May 2008
Punitively and permanently blocked for discussing edits on the talk page, edits that other editors agree with, or edits that etablished editors could offer no contraindicating evidence for not allowing.
Because the polices can be used against me, and I am not allowed to edit by policy, this block is not just punitive, but permanent. A user cannot be expected to know which policies apply and which don't, but since this is required on Misplaced Pages it effectively means that it can be used against any new editors that one disagrees with simply by getting a like-minded gang of editors to do the same thing.
But what's accuracy, when someone can show that what they think "looks" okay is better than what the Misplaced Pages community decided is policy? What's accuracy, when you can be blocked by an administrator for questioning something that goes against Misplaced Pages policy?
The administrator who blocked me did so because he was supporting the editors who did not have any policy matters to quote or any reliable sources to use for the article. While I was discussing why the source was unreliable, my arguments were being met with comments like, "Let it go." Clearly, with these editors having no reliable sources, and being unable to come up with any, and unable to read the German source (which doesn't quite agree with the article), the administrator had to block me to support his established Misplaced Pages editors.
I was blocked because I could discuss my edits, but no one else could.
And that is not just punitive, but petty, and against policy.
And now the blocking administrator is sorry he dragged an established editor into this mess and has apologized to the editor who was edit warring and reverting me.
Not suprised by that, though.
And
As I pointed out, I was discussing my concerns with the article on the talk page, when I was blocked, not whatever the hell Ruoyung is coming to bash me about now. Cut it out. You get your say, you get your article, you get your administrative right to bully, and I get blocked. Isn't that enough for you? What do you want?
This is not taunting. This is a plain message to you. If you would not be so defensive, read it. I am saying when you do get unblocked, please take what I am saying as constructive criticism. You are a great writer, but your "bedside manner" needs work.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
The block
The block was entirely punitive, now another administrator comes to my talk page and brags about the abuse of administrative powers that can and does go on on Misplaced Pages by bragging that the block was punitive. Yes, I know, nothing can be done about it. Administrators can do whatever they want. And get away with it. Cut it out, already. Go find some other new editor to bully out of Misplaced Pages.
And apparently administrators get to harass their victims and taunt them. Wow.