Talk:Orobanchaceae: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:29, 5 May 2008 editKingdon (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,135 edits →A type of this: OK← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:00, 5 May 2008 edit undoMaxschmelling (talk \| contribs)1,594 edits →A type of this Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I added this here, because - one link says it is a type of this subject plant. While another link says it is a new and different one, and still has to be named, still, it is not yet settled if this is really a new one, until scientists officially name this one. So, until named in Latin, I added this here, since it is a type of this plant here: On ], 2008, ] ] George Yatskievych and a colleague, with the ], rediscovered and identified (in ], a pine ] forest in ]'s mountains) a rare odd, orange-brown, fleshy-stemmed ] plant, first found in ] by Wayt Thomas, ] scientist. A type of ], the pine cone-shaped dense cluster of flowers and juicy celery-like stalks plant will have the formal ] name for the "little ] of ]," both a new ] and a new ] because "it is so unusual and distinct that it cannot be included in any of the existing genera in the plant family ]". There are echoes in this plant’s lifestyle of species such as ], which steals its goodness from funghi.<ref></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref> --] (]) 06:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)		I added this here, because - one link says it is a type of this subject plant. While another link says it is a new and different one, and still has to be named, still, it is not yet settled if this is really a new one, until scientists officially name this one. So, until named in Latin, I added this here, since it is a type of this plant here: On ], 2008, ] ] George Yatskievych and a colleague, with the ], rediscovered and identified (in ], a pine ] forest in ]'s mountains) a rare odd, orange-brown, fleshy-stemmed ] plant, first found in ] by Wayt Thomas, ] scientist. A type of ], the pine cone-shaped dense cluster of flowers and juicy celery-like stalks plant will have the formal ] name for the "little ] of ]," both a new ] and a new ] because "it is so unusual and distinct that it cannot be included in any of the existing genera in the plant family ]". There are echoes in this plant’s lifestyle of species such as ], which steals its goodness from funghi.<ref></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref> --] (]) 06:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
	:Normally such material would go in an article for the genus (which would also cover the species, since there is only one). But it probably is wise to wait until the genus is published in a scientific journal (planned for later in 2008), so keeping this material here for now sounds good to me. ] (]) 13:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)		:Normally such material would go in an article for the genus (which would also cover the species, since there is only one). But it probably is wise to wait until the genus is published in a scientific journal (planned for later in 2008), so keeping this material here for now sounds good to me. ] (]) 13:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
			::Floro has a history of adding news items in the wrong places, I revert many of them. If you think this really belongs here feel free to revert my edit, but it seems like this new find, though notable, doesn't deserve so much more attention than the other plants in this family. Adding the genus here seems like as much as is really necessary, once there is such a genus. And, if you do put it back, one of the refs would probably be sufficient, they are really just 4 copies of the same AP story. ] (]) 17:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:00, 5 May 2008

Plants Unassessed

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A type of this

I added this here, because - one link says it is a type of this subject plant. While another link says it is a new and different one, and still has to be named, still, it is not yet settled if this is really a new one, until scientists officially name this one. So, until named in Latin, I added this here, since it is a type of this plant here: On May, 2008, St. Louis botanist George Yatskievych and a colleague, with the Missouri Botanical Garden, rediscovered and identified (in Sierra Madre del Sur, a pine oak forest in Mexico's mountains) a rare odd, orange-brown, fleshy-stemmed parasitic plant, first found in 1985 by Wayt Thomas, New York Botanical Garden scientist. A type of Orobanchaceae, the pine cone-shaped dense cluster of flowers and juicy celery-like stalks plant will have the formal Latin name for the "little hermit of Mexico," both a new species and a new genus because "it is so unusual and distinct that it cannot be included in any of the existing genera in the plant family Orobanchaceae". There are echoes in this plant’s lifestyle of species such as Orthilia secunda, which steals its goodness from funghi. --Florentino floro (talk) 06:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Normally such material would go in an article for the genus (which would also cover the species, since there is only one). But it probably is wise to wait until the genus is published in a scientific journal (planned for later in 2008), so keeping this material here for now sounds good to me. Kingdon (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Floro has a history of adding news items in the wrong places, I revert many of them. If you think this really belongs here feel free to revert my edit, but it seems like this new find, though notable, doesn't deserve so much more attention than the other plants in this family. Adding the genus here seems like as much as is really necessary, once there is such a genus. And, if you do put it back, one of the refs would probably be sufficient, they are really just 4 copies of the same AP story. maxsch (talk) 17:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Categories: