Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Atomic County: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:48, 10 December 2007 editMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,576 edits Closing debate; result was delete← Previous edit Revision as of 16:37, 7 May 2008 edit undoChicken Quiet (talk | contribs)69 edits Atomic CountyNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:


*'''Delete''' per nom, nonsense. -] 19:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom, nonsense. -] 19:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

:Nonsence? I'm sorry, but how was that article nonsence. it made perfect sence! if you watched The O.C. then you would know. AND, I'm sorry, but if Veronica Townsend is notible enough, then this has to be, because she is a minor, minor compared to Atomic County


<hr style="width:50%;"/> <hr style="width:50%;"/>

Revision as of 16:37, 7 May 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Atomic County

Atomic County (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable in-universe item β 16:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Nonsence? I'm sorry, but how was that article nonsence. it made perfect sence! if you watched The O.C. then you would know. AND, I'm sorry, but if Veronica Townsend is notible enough, then this has to be, because she is a minor, minor compared to Atomic County

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck (talk) 01:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.