Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:00, 18 May 2008

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. I will reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

Re: User:Damienfranco

Sorry for not reply you before. Definitively, Damienfranco was a vandal... everything that he had on his userpage was only a lot of bad words and insults. Thank you for blocking his account!! Take care!! --Snakeyes _talk

Quebec Green Party

I wanted to give the guy the benefit of the doubt. So I did a massive search, and didn't find anything. GreenJoe 02:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Block this user

User talk:Escortoffer evidently reveals spamming. thanks Roadrunnerz45 12:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Help with Pau Gasol page

I'm having some trouble with some editing, While I was gone, people were changing it, and it didn't help it to what I had improved on it. If you can take a look and let me know if this is vandilism and if it can be dealt with, I'd be much appreciated. Gamloverks (talk) 00:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Never mind, just monitor the page please... Gamloverks (talk) 01:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Crunk Club

Good call adding the other article, I should have spotted that. Guest9999 (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

888 Holdings

OK. Noted. But many thanks for your help anyway. Dormskirk (talk) 21:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Arumugam

Articles about future films with unclear or insufficient notability may be challenged at WP:AFD. If you want it restored, I'll do it, but that's the likely response. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Such an article would undoubtedly be challenged as a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. WP:SNOW suggests we let it stay dead, unless the creator or another user objects. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hdayejr?

No, I'm on the other side. I'm the one who's trying to STOP him from destroying Misplaced Pages. Check the logs again.69.132.26.177 (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC

Thank you. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 01:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The paragraph about the Ohio Revised Codes? It's a long story with implications IRL, not just threatening violence against another Misplaced Pages user. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't know him IRL. I just know how much damage he's done to Misplaced Pages. He is NOT some kind of innocent victim here. He's a sockpuppet of a multiply banned user. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 02:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

If you're interested, feel free to read/comment at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Leon harrison and 69.132.26.177. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I've left a comment there. Thank you. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 17:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

AIV

I saw that you closed the AIV report for User:Mattbroon. I don't have a problem with it as such but I thought that your edit summary was a bit strange: "3h since last edit, edits appear good faith". No questions about the 3h since last edit part, but could you seriously argue that these edits were in good faith: and ? Prodding a prominent British politician Neil Kinnock for deletion with the reason given as "It appears to be a commercial exercise and has no part to play in an Encyclopedia" and then manually forging the time stamp on the prod to make it appear that the prod has expired. That is pretty far away from good faith, isn't it? Nsk92 (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Nsk92 (talk) 20:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Supernatural

Hey, don't know if you remember, but you previously helped out on the Supernatural page with the person who kept removing the people from the Stars list. Now that the season is over, he or she is back at it, despite all attempts for logical compromises. I was wondering if you could give your assistance again?

ThanksOphois (talk) 22:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

A couple of things, forum shopping is generally considered bad, things like this belong on WP:AN/3RR, not on an admins talk page soliciting assistance. Further, WP:3RR is explicit in enforcement:

In the cases where multiple editors violate the rule, administrators should treat all sides equally.

— Misplaced Pages:Three-revert_rule#Enforcement

Please use care when issuing blocks in the future. —Locke Cole • t • c 08:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I noticed this as well. Report filed here, where I noted that you (C.Fred) also carried out one of the reverts. See here. The timing of this was the same (either just before or just after) your block of the IP editor for 3RR. Please do not get involved in the edit war when giving blocks for 3RR. I've also reviewed the edit history of the article, and it appears you are actively editing the article. Please report content disputes for other to deal with in future. Carcharoth (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Dead link used as citation

I don't think that posting a dead link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265374,00.htm) as a source does much to 'prove' a point. Are you arguing that Crystal Gail Mangum was not a prostitute? Duke53 | 03:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)