Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:05, 19 May 2008 editDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators224,798 edits Articles created/expanded on May 15: good← Previous edit Revision as of 21:12, 19 May 2008 edit undoDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators224,798 edits Articles created/expanded on May 15: good, add wikification to hookNext edit →
Line 332: Line 332:
::::Article renamed per comment here and other discussion. I struck out original nom and the alternative DYK wording, above, is now preferred. ] (]) 20:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC) ::::Article renamed per comment here and other discussion. I struck out original nom and the alternative DYK wording, above, is now preferred. ] (]) 20:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


*... that ''']''' was successful in getting the 2008 edition of the State Personnel manual to prohibit discrimination based on sexuality and gender identity? Self-nom. ] (]) 00:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC) *... that ''']''' was successful in getting the 2008 edition of the State Personnel manual to prohibit ]? Self-nom. ] (]) 00:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
: Please be reminded that a DYK article needs to have at least 1500 characters of prose to qualify. ] is currently too short, but there is ample time to expand the article before this nomination expires. --] (]) 22:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC) : Please be reminded that a DYK article needs to have at least 1500 characters of prose to qualify. ] is currently too short, but there is ample time to expand the article before this nomination expires. --] (]) 22:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
::Is it better now? ] (]) 00:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC) ::Is it better now? ] (]) 00:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Line 339: Line 339:
::::So does this mean it's accepted? ] (]) 20:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC) ::::So does this mean it's accepted? ] (]) 20:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
:::*Yes, 1973 bytes is accepted as long enough. Others will soon inspect citations and other details. ] (]) 22:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC) :::*Yes, 1973 bytes is accepted as long enough. Others will soon inspect citations and other details. ] (]) 22:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
::::] Length and reference verified. Wikified relevant words in hook.

*... that the town of ''']''' in ], ] is famous for its Bhagavathar Melas and an unique style of '']'' which is practised here? - (increased five-fold) self-nom by -<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">]</font></sub> 11:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC) *... that the town of ''']''' in ], ] is famous for its Bhagavathar Melas and an unique style of '']'' which is practised here? - (increased five-fold) self-nom by -<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">]</font></sub> 11:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
:] Length and reference verified. ] (]) 21:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC) :] Length and reference verified. ] (]) 21:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:12, 19 May 2008

For discussion of the "Did you know" section, see Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know.
JortsJorts

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main PageT:DYK
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles that have been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • preferably cited in the article with an inline citation.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as ] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ] and ~~~~
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|January 6}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
] Yes No problems, ready for DYK
] Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
] Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix.
] No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2025-01-06T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on May 19

Articles created/expanded on May 18

I removed the image, because it is a non-free, which we can't use here. --BorgQueen (talk) 05:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

OR

... that actor Buck Taylor, though he still appears in mostly western films, is also a prolific artist of the American West? --self-nom Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

OR

... that actor-artist Buck Taylor recently painted a portrait of his friend and former Gunsmoke costar James Arness?-self-nom Billy Hathorn (talk) 03:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 17

→Another Brighton & Hove church with three possible hooks:

  • ... that most of the interior of the 19th-century St Patrick's Church, Hove has been rebuilt as a 22-bed night shelter which includes "MiPods", a variation on the 1970s "sleep capsule" concept?
  • ... that the extent to which music was used in services in the early years at St Patrick's Church, Hove led to it being referred to mockingly as "Paddy's Music Hall"?
  • ... that the north window at St Patrick's Church, Hove—a memorial to its first curate, Dr James O'Brien, and his wife—was installed 14 years before they died?
Self-nom. I don't know if the ref is good for the first (it's to the shelter's charity's own website), although it's very interesting! The second is relatively unexciting. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 23:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
OR
OR

Articles created/expanded on May 16

Kosa Pan
Kosa Pan
There are few more days to expand the article. --PFHLai (talk) 02:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Cystatin C
Cystatin C
Mahadeva temple
Mahadeva temple
Which article? Please mark the DYK article in bold. Also, include a note pointing to the picture you have included. Thus, it should look like this:
Drawing of Benjamin Robins' ballistic pendulum
Drawing of Benjamin Robins' ballistic pendulum
*bangs head on wall* Thingg 22:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Alternative:
... that German mathematician Friedrich Heinrich Albert Wangerin wrote an important two volume treatise on potential theory and spherical functions, Theorie des Potentials und der Kugelfunktionen, in 1909 and 1921? Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Why can't it go on the main page? It's long enough and the ref checks out! (lol) Mjroots (talk) 14:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I've bolded the RFA instead of the log ;). Mjroots (talk) 14:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Abdominal CT scan of a patient with subcutaneous emphysema
Abdominal CT scan of a patient with subcutaneous emphysema
Created this article especially to mark my 100th DYK.--Bedford 03:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Congrats on your 100th DYK (to be)! That is truly mind blowing. Minor thing: wouldn't it be "a Union Army patrol"? delldot talk 12:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, although I figured out last night that my 100th will actually be the Indiana State Parks one, which is suitable for 100 as well (I should have accredited myself with one I didn't.)--Bedford 15:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Victoria Hotel after cyclone, 1897
Victoria Hotel after cyclone, 1897
Samuel Huston
Samuel Huston
  • ... that Polish-Russian relations really began with the Polish-Lithuanian union of Lublin in the 16th century, which marked the beginning of centuries of struggle over dominance of Central and Eastern Europe between Poland and Russia? --self-nom by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment Relations between Poland and Russia are recorded from the 10th century. So how can such a thing be stated as a fact? Can you find a more concrete factual hook? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 03:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
      • This hook is based on a statement by a historian (footnoted in the article). It is also not controversial (like a hook noting the importance of Polish capture of Moscow or Katyn invasion would be) or banal (as a hook stating the relations are important and suffer from ups and downs would be). Perhaps instead of "really began" we could write "took on a new importance" or something like that to indicate that yes, there were relations since 10th century, but they were not as crucial? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
        • I can find a similar statement in the source, but not the article. It is not controversial in the sense that it probably won't piss anyone off, but you can tell yourself it is could be misleading unless one follows the sources narrative with a great deal of insight. Not as crucial? I dunno. Several branches of the Riurikids greatly relied on Polish kinship links for their power in Rus, it was common for Rus' princes to pay the Polish king to act as a mercenary captain in the 11th century, regimes changed in Rus through this Polish intervention, the Rus put down a rebellion among the Mazovians, and one interpretation of a passage in the Byzantine De Administrando Imperio has the 10th century Poles as tributaries of the Rus. Less controversial than "really began with the" would be "entered a new era". I don't like this kind of assertion in DYKs - prefer concrete things - but this at least avoids some of the problems with the first suggestion.:) Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 03:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I think the hook could probably be fixed just by substituting "intensified" for "really began". Gatoclass (talk) 04:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
"Intensified" or "entered a new era" sound fine to me.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 15

SS Kroonland
SS Kroonland
Alternative: ... that the city of Los Angeles has 186 buildings, districts, ships and other sites listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places?
Alternative, shorter: ... that the City of Los Angeles has 186 sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places?
Note: As a brand-new list-table of NRHP sites, we think this is unusual for a DYK. Most such list-tables are developed slowly. The table and most content is new; the untabulated list of site names only appeared previously within a county-wide, unverified list. The table includes many red-links, due to its nature, but note that it is a comprehensive list and it has more than 50 pictures rounded up already. We prefer not to start stub articles for each of the sites covered; the blue-links are to mostly Start-level articles. The intro text is about 1300 characters at this moment, and will be increased to 1500 in the next day or so, just to ensure that the article qualifies for DYK. doncram (talk) 04:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
The article itself needs a rename. City of Angels is not really encyclopedic. Just say "in Los Angeles"... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Article renamed per comment here and other discussion. I struck out original nom and the alternative DYK wording, above, is now preferred. doncram (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Please be reminded that a DYK article needs to have at least 1500 characters of prose to qualify. Equality North Carolina is currently too short, but there is ample time to expand the article before this nomination expires. --PFHLai (talk) 22:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Is it better now? The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 00:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
The article is 4076 bytes long, at the time I write this posting, and it is mainly taken up by context. Is the article long enough for Did You Know? yet? The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 02:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
So does this mean it's accepted? The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Length and reference verified. Wikified relevant words in hook.
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Source links to wrong Welsh biography page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
But the article states 'It is believed to be the only bridge on Earth that begins and ends in the same county, crosses over two rivers (Green River and the Rough River, and passes over an entirely different county.' - implying the bridge is unique because it crosses all of these different things. At most it can only be said to claim that "'It is believed to be the only bridge in the world that starts and ends in the same county" - Benea (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Could we change the hook to read "it is probably the only bridge in the world..."? I'm not sure if hooks can be like that, but if it is allowed, I think it would be really cool to put that on the Main Page because I'm sure a lot of people would read it. Thingg 22:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I changed the hook; how does it look?--Bedford 23:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Looks good! nice find. Thingg 16:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. It was indeed a nice find; I only found it due to being lost bewildered while traveling last Saturday.--Bedford 23:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
The placement of the comma and "yet" is ambiguous and could be misleading to readers here, because of the divide it creates in the sentence; as it reads now, it's unclear what the "only bridge in the world" definition comprises. I'd suggest just gutting the "only bridge in the world" part and using: ... that the Livermore Bridge starts and ends in the same county, yet passes over two rivers and a different county? I think the hook would still be quite interesting. BuddingJournalist 00:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Verified length, date and ref. —SusanLesch (talk) 18:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Verified length, date and that ref exists. —SusanLesch (talk) 18:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Which article? The359 (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I assume its the Woodhouse Grove School, but it doesn't look like this is a five-fold expansion within the last five days. BuddingJournalist 19:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
It does appear to be the Woodhouse article. I think it's skirting the edge of the 5-day rule (21stCenturyGreenstuff's edits to this article began on May 9th, but he really only reached 5x expansion today). However, the hook used here is poorly worded and uninteresting. It presents no unique factoid other than saying exactly what the school is. The359 (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 13:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC
Verified length, date and that book ref exists. Added pictured text to hook in case you need one. —SusanLesch (talk) 18:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Verified length, date and that book ref exists. —SusanLesch (talk) 18:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Length 5x since 14 May when article started. Ref also verified. —SusanLesch (talk) 18:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Cited source for ranch size 404s; other one doesn't have a footnote. Daniel Case (talk) 13:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Henry Failing
Henry Failing
Length and reference verified. Let's use the second hook. Daniel Case (talk) 13:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
IMdB isn't an acceptable source for this sort of thing. Daniel Case (talk) 13:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 14

ALT:*... that the first head coach, Hall of Famer Punch Imlach, has the lowest winning percentage of any Sabres coach, with 0.370 during his 120-game tenure? « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 19:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The Triumphal Arch
The Triumphal Arch
  • Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't play in here too often) but I think only content is counted, not references, etc. If so, then the length went from a bit over 900 to under 3,300. If I'm splitting hairs, someone more experienced here please overrule because it's a much nicer article now. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I goofed. I can live with that. I'm just happy the article is better, DYK would have been an added bonus. TravellingCari 21:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, only a x3, sorry. Gatoclass (talk) 11:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Hook is too specific for a general audience. "Nested irregular tuplets" will do, but you will also need a cite with a page number for that particular statement, even though there is only one reference. Gatoclass (talk) 12:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • "Nested irregular tuplets" is fine. But isn't requiring a citation for something that's in the image of the score (in the article) and not interpretive, a bit like asking for a citation of "Lincoln had a beard" in an article with an image of Lincoln and a beard? I don't think it helps readers at all and not necessary for WP:V. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I don't quite think it's akin to "Lincoln had a beard", because for one thing everyone knows what a beard looks like but very few of us would know a "nested irregular tuplet" if we saw one. Furthermore a single example doesn't demonstrate that "nested irregular tuplets" are a feature of this piece, which is what the hook implies. So I do think you'd need a cite for this hook. If you don't have one, I think you should probably come up with a different hook that you can cite to a reliable source. Gatoclass (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Even after bolding new article, it's way too short. Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on May 13

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Reference verified but article is too short. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

*... that Patcham Windmill (pictured) was the last windmill built in Sussex? New article created on 13 May and self-nom by Mjroots (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Too short and hook fact isn't in article. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I've added the fact to the article, but can't expand further, so am withdrawing the nom. Mjroots (talk) 05:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

*... that before Dr. Seuss's Yertle the Turtle and Other Stories was published by Random House, a meeting had to be held because it contained the word "burp", which was then considered vulgar? — (not entirely sure about the wording, please suggest) self-nom, Mr. Absurd (talk) 05:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

perhaps:
... that a meeting had to be held before Dr. Seuss's Yertle the Turtle and Other Stories was published by Random House as it contained the word "burp", which was then considered vulgar?
Hows that for an alt hook?
however, i'm not too sure that it meets DYK's guidelines. It's not new, and it doesnt' appear to have expanded five-fold. BG7 10:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Preexisting article that has only had a ~25% increase in readable text, far short of the fivefold expansion called for in the #Instructions. --Allen3  14:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 12

Template:Http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080508/OBITUARIES01/805080334/1060/NEWS01= (I couldn't figure this out.)Billy Hathorn (talk) 01:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I removed the part about party and use of the phone number. Billy Hathorn (talk) 01:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Nearest footnote says nothing about paper's founding. Daniel Case (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


See also

Category: