| Revision as of 10:16, 22 May 2008 editDirector (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers58,714 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:46, 22 May 2008 edit undoPedro (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators22,741 edits →Your Edits: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits.<br/> If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Chetniks|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">] <sup>(])</sup></font> 10:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits.<br/> If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Chetniks|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">] <sup>(])</sup></font> 10:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Your Edits == | |||
| Please note that the appropriate place to discuss difflcuties in articles is the talk page of the article itself. Repeatedly removing content or engaging in ] may lead to a ] of your account. You are urged to engage in dialogue on the talk page of the article. Please note that continued edit warring without discussion '''will''' lead to a removal of editing privelidges. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 10:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:46, 22 May 2008
Discuss
Deucaon, please believe me when I say that I mean no ill-will when I edit the Chetniks article. Once again I would like to ask you to discuss your edit instead of simply reverting out of hand, its not the way things are done on Misplaced Pages. Simply reverting is the best way to end up in a revert-war. regards --DIREKTOR 09:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- The picture has no relevance and you changed a number of other things as well - Deucaon.
The picture has no relevance? It is the flag of the Chetnik movement that's been used during WW2, that's been established a long time ago. The flag you're using is the Yugoslav naval ensign, its has no relevance. Let me point out once more that the flag of a movement is not the flag of the country it owed its allegiance to. (See: Partisan flag , and SFR Yugoslav flag .)
As for the Chetnik/Axis pic, it certainly has relevance. It does not prove anything, yes, but it shows Chetniks so it should be on the Chetniks article. The pictiure's addition is in accordance with policy, you cannot just remove pictures you don't like that is a violation of WP:VAN. --DIREKTOR 09:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Warning
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did to Chetniks, you will be blocked from editing. --DIREKTOR 10:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Your Edits
Please note that the appropriate place to discuss difflcuties in articles is the talk page of the article itself. Repeatedly removing content or engaging in revert wars may lead to a block of your account. You are urged to engage in dialogue on the talk page of the article. Please note that continued edit warring without discussion will lead to a removal of editing privelidges. Pedro : Chat 10:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)