| Revision as of 06:11, 24 May 2008 editKbir1 (talk | contribs)6,717 edits ←Created page with 'I'm not sure if you noticed, but I had respectfully requested that anyone objecting to my removal of the "Appearance and Taste" section of the Leo McGarry artic...' | Revision as of 18:18, 24 May 2008 edit undoKbir1 (talk | contribs)6,717 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I'm not sure if you noticed, but I had respectfully requested that anyone objecting to my removal of the "Appearance and Taste" section of the ] article please contribute to the discussion at ] BEFORE reverting. I see that you've reverted without contributing to that discussion. I won't be reverting your edit for now, but could you please contribute to the discussion there? Clearly you feel that that section needs to be there and I think the community deserves to read your rationale. When contributing, though, please remember to ] on the part of other Misplaced Pages users, including me. Thanks! --] (]) 06:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC) | I'm not sure if you noticed, but I had respectfully requested that anyone objecting to my removal of the "Appearance and Taste" section of the ] article please contribute to the discussion at ] BEFORE reverting. I see that you've reverted without contributing to that discussion. I won't be reverting your edit for now, but could you please contribute to the discussion there? Clearly you feel that that section needs to be there and I think the community deserves to read your rationale. When contributing, though, please remember to ] on the part of other Misplaced Pages users, including me. Thanks! --] (]) 06:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Regarding your response on my talk page, which read, "I'm not sure you noticed but I chose to ignore you're suggestion." Please remember that Misplaced Pages works by ]. I'm trying to work with you to build a consensus, which is why I keep insisting that you contribute to the discussion on the talk page. Right now (with 2 contributions), that discussion isn't going in your favor. If a stronger consensus builds, then the policies of Misplaced Pages will dictate that the "Appearance and Taste" section be removed. If you then choose to ignore that consensus, it will be seen as disruptive by the Misplaced Pages community. If, however, you rationally lay out your arguments on the talk page, you may find consensus working in your favor. Come on, we're all trying to make the article the best it can be, right? Let's work together instead of arguing, huh? Thanks! --] (]) 06:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:18, 24 May 2008
I'm not sure if you noticed, but I had respectfully requested that anyone objecting to my removal of the "Appearance and Taste" section of the Leo McGarry article please contribute to the discussion at Talk:Leo McGarry#Leo's appearance BEFORE reverting. I see that you've reverted without contributing to that discussion. I won't be reverting your edit for now, but could you please contribute to the discussion there? Clearly you feel that that section needs to be there and I think the community deserves to read your rationale. When contributing, though, please remember to assume good faith on the part of other Misplaced Pages users, including me. Thanks! --Hnsampat (talk) 06:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding your response on my talk page, which read, "I'm not sure you noticed but I chose to ignore you're suggestion." Please remember that Misplaced Pages works by consensus. I'm trying to work with you to build a consensus, which is why I keep insisting that you contribute to the discussion on the talk page. Right now (with 2 contributions), that discussion isn't going in your favor. If a stronger consensus builds, then the policies of Misplaced Pages will dictate that the "Appearance and Taste" section be removed. If you then choose to ignore that consensus, it will be seen as disruptive by the Misplaced Pages community. If, however, you rationally lay out your arguments on the talk page, you may find consensus working in your favor. Come on, we're all trying to make the article the best it can be, right? Let's work together instead of arguing, huh? Thanks! --Hnsampat (talk) 06:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)