| Revision as of 12:24, 5 June 2008 editAndyJones (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,503 edits →St. Luke Lutheran Church: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:11, 5 June 2008 edit undoPastordavid (talk | contribs)10,302 edits delNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per ]. Most individual local churches are non-notable. The church has apparently been mentioned on occasion in independent reliable sources but does not appear to have received significant coverage from them. --] ] 06:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ]. Most individual local churches are non-notable. The church has apparently been mentioned on occasion in independent reliable sources but does not appear to have received significant coverage from them. --] ] 06:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Most individual churches aren't notable. ] (]) 12:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Most individual churches aren't notable. ] (]) 12:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete.''' Individual congregations are neither inherently notable nor inherently non-notable. This particular one has no specific claijms to notability: (a) it is not particularly old, (b) it has not had a storied history, (c) it is large, but not in an extra-ordinary way, and (d) it has not been served by any particularly notable pastors. I doubt that this would be notable enough for a mention in the Portland article; there is a small mention in the ], which seems appropriate. God is gracious -- Misplaced Pages demands notability. ] (]) 13:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:11, 5 June 2008
St. Luke Lutheran Church
- St. Luke Lutheran Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable church. Katr67 (talk) 19:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. —Katr67 (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The article needs to be rewritten, not deleted. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, does not appear to have any claim of notability. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:ORG. Most individual local churches are non-notable. The church has apparently been mentioned on occasion in independent reliable sources but does not appear to have received significant coverage from them. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Most individual churches aren't notable. AndyJones (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Individual congregations are neither inherently notable nor inherently non-notable. This particular one has no specific claijms to notability: (a) it is not particularly old, (b) it has not had a storied history, (c) it is large, but not in an extra-ordinary way, and (d) it has not been served by any particularly notable pastors. I doubt that this would be notable enough for a mention in the Portland article; there is a small mention in the neighborhood article, which seems appropriate. God is gracious -- Misplaced Pages demands notability. Pastordavid (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)