Revision as of 23:13, 5 June 2008 editPixelsmart (talk | contribs)6 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:59, 5 June 2008 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,466 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Your reason should include your response to this issue ''and'' a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our ] (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed ]. {{#if:] (]) 07:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)|] (]) 07:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:Uw-spamublock -->{{#switch:User talk|User|User talk=]}} | Your reason should include your response to this issue ''and'' a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our ] (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed ]. {{#if:] (]) 07:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)|] (]) 07:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:Uw-spamublock -->{{#switch:User talk|User|User talk=]}} | ||
{{unblock|I am not a spammer. I am a self employeed engineer. This has been my first post and boy have I ever been slammed hard. Regarding the new entry I created - Hyperresolution. I wanted a public record of my work. I see that, that is just too suspicious around here. Please delete it as I will not defend it further. If I am able to have it published in a scientific journal, then I will resubmit it to wikipedia. By for now.}} | {{unblock|I am not a spammer. I am a self employeed engineer. This has been my first post and boy have I ever been slammed hard. Regarding the new entry I created - Hyperresolution. I wanted a public record of my work. I see that, that is just too suspicious around here. Please delete it as I will not defend it further. If I am able to have it published in a scientific journal, then I will resubmit it to wikipedia. By for now.}} | ||
*A bit of newbie biting here? "Spamming" isn't the issue, anyway; the gentleman needs a polite lesson in our ] policies, not a kick in the crotch. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:59, 5 June 2008
Speedy deletion of Hyperresolution
A tag has been placed on Hyperresolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Misplaced Pages:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Jameson L. Tai 02:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
HELLO, This is valid current research and not spam. It is not commercial. It is placed to advance the body of knowledge in the field of HCI and to stimulate other researchers to think about the problems in navigating hyperresolution images. This is not advertising nor is it self promotion. Dan DeConinck --Pixelsmart (talk) 02:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Misplaced Pages:Business' FAQ and Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest.This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Misplaced Pages policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.
You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.
Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. MCB (talk) 07:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Pixelsmart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a spammer. I am a self employeed engineer. This has been my first post and boy have I ever been slammed hard. Regarding the new entry I created - Hyperresolution. I wanted a public record of my work. I see that, that is just too suspicious around here. Please delete it as I will not defend it further. If I am able to have it published in a scientific journal, then I will resubmit it to wikipedia. By for now.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a spammer. I am a self employeed engineer. This has been my first post and boy have I ever been slammed hard. Regarding the new entry I created - Hyperresolution. I wanted a public record of my work. I see that, that is just too suspicious around here. Please delete it as I will not defend it further. If I am able to have it published in a scientific journal, then I will resubmit it to wikipedia. By for now. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a spammer. I am a self employeed engineer. This has been my first post and boy have I ever been slammed hard. Regarding the new entry I created - Hyperresolution. I wanted a public record of my work. I see that, that is just too suspicious around here. Please delete it as I will not defend it further. If I am able to have it published in a scientific journal, then I will resubmit it to wikipedia. By for now. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a spammer. I am a self employeed engineer. This has been my first post and boy have I ever been slammed hard. Regarding the new entry I created - Hyperresolution. I wanted a public record of my work. I see that, that is just too suspicious around here. Please delete it as I will not defend it further. If I am able to have it published in a scientific journal, then I will resubmit it to wikipedia. By for now. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- A bit of newbie biting here? "Spamming" isn't the issue, anyway; the gentleman needs a polite lesson in our original research policies, not a kick in the crotch. --jpgordon 23:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)