Revision as of 09:58, 15 June 2008 editBlechnic (talk | contribs)3,540 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:FPCdel | <!-- Please fill out this data and then click "Save page" --> | title = Image:Plant cell structure svg.svg | image = Plant cell structure sv...' | Revision as of 09:44, 16 June 2008 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits →Image:Plant cell structure svg.svgNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* '''Delist''' — ] (]) 09:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | * '''Delist''' — ] (]) 09:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
* '''Keep''' — There seems to be nothing wrong with this image other than the fact that it is a static image. Sure, the real organelles will be active and moving in a real cell, but this cannot be accurately depicted in a static two dimensional system. Perhaps if we had a diagram that depicted this, it would be beneficial to the project, just as this image is.—] (]) 09:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
* | |||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> | <!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
Revision as of 09:44, 16 June 2008
Image:Plant cell structure svg.svg
- Reason
- The Golgi apparatus in this cell appears to be doing nothing, however, this is a highly specific subcellular organelle that processes important substances for the cell, obtaining them initially from the ER and detaching vesicles to send them to the plasma membrane. There's more to it than this, but this Golgi appears to be getting proteins from the vacuole and modifying them to be sent to the nucleus? Or maybe it is getting stuff from the rER around the nucleus and sending it to the vacuole, but the Golgi vesicles don't appear to be coming from the ER? It's hard to tell, but it's not Golgi that's going on. The Golgi needs to be accurate, cause this cell won't live.
- Nominator
- Blechnic (talk)
- Delist — Blechnic (talk) 09:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep — There seems to be nothing wrong with this image other than the fact that it is a static image. Sure, the real organelles will be active and moving in a real cell, but this cannot be accurately depicted in a static two dimensional system. Perhaps if we had a diagram that depicted this, it would be beneficial to the project, just as this image is.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)