User talk:ChyranandChloe: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:57, 24 June 2008 editChyranandChloe (talk \| contribs)Rollbackers4,354 edits →Changes of titles and boundaries: eye movement ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:06, 24 June 2008 edit undoTony1 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors276,760 edits →Changes of titles and boundaries: eye movement: What was your former username? Were you banned?Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:''']''' is an ambiguous term — a term relative to its context — provided that there is also ] and ]; therefore a disambiguation is necessary, and the slot where "Eye movement" formerly held has been allocated to that of the disambiguation page. Furthermore "Eye movement" has been categorized as a "Sensory system – Visual system and eye movement" well before the move was made. '''Eye movement in reading''', formerly named '''Eye movement in language reading''', is over-elaborated: the "language" portion is unnecessary as there can be no reading unless there is language medium. '''"Eye movement in music reading"''' has not undergone any major changes except for the addition of the disambiguation link and the a slight modernization of its syntax. I apologize that the warrant came after the move; seeing that the discussion pages has been well under-develop, a sign of inactivity, there was no need for one. I can agree that each article is unsatisfactory to some degree, but in a way this move brings the attention needed to either improve these articles or bring about their merger. ] (]) 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:''']''' is an ambiguous term — a term relative to its context — provided that there is also ] and ]; therefore a disambiguation is necessary, and the slot where "Eye movement" formerly held has been allocated to that of the disambiguation page. Furthermore "Eye movement" has been categorized as a "Sensory system – Visual system and eye movement" well before the move was made. '''Eye movement in reading''', formerly named '''Eye movement in language reading''', is over-elaborated: the "language" portion is unnecessary as there can be no reading unless there is language medium. '''"Eye movement in music reading"''' has not undergone any major changes except for the addition of the disambiguation link and the a slight modernization of its syntax. I apologize that the warrant came after the move; seeing that the discussion pages has been well under-develop, a sign of inactivity, there was no need for one. I can agree that each article is unsatisfactory to some degree, but in a way this move brings the attention needed to either improve these articles or bring about their merger. ] (]) 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

			::Further vandalism will result in an AN/I. Please heed this warning. As I've flagged elsewhere, I'm taking steps to move the language reading title back to its former wording. Do NOT make major changes without consensus, and certainly not before discussion on the talk page; this unilateral action now characterises your activity.

			::No one will believe that you suddenly sprouted this username from out there. I ask again, what was your former username? Were you banned? ] ] 04:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:06, 24 June 2008

Welcoming myself:

Changes of titles and boundaries: eye movement

Now just one minute. I saw no notification of these changes on talk pages. Why is eye momement now cast totally in terms of "sensory" in that article? The categories "Eye movement in reading" and "Eye movement in music reading" are now totally unsatisfactory. Move them back, please, to language and music, respecitvely. TONY (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Eye movement is an ambiguous term — a term relative to its context — provided that there is also Eye movement in reading and Eye movement in music reading; therefore a disambiguation is necessary, and the slot where "Eye movement" formerly held has been allocated to that of the disambiguation page. Furthermore "Eye movement" has been categorized as a "Sensory system – Visual system and eye movement" well before the move was made. Eye movement in reading, formerly named Eye movement in language reading, is over-elaborated: the "language" portion is unnecessary as there can be no reading unless there is language medium. "Eye movement in music reading" has not undergone any major changes except for the addition of the disambiguation link and the a slight modernization of its syntax. I apologize that the warrant came after the move; seeing that the discussion pages has been well under-develop, a sign of inactivity, there was no need for one. I can agree that each article is unsatisfactory to some degree, but in a way this move brings the attention needed to either improve these articles or bring about their merger. ChyranandChloe (talk) 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Further vandalism will result in an AN/I. Please heed this warning. As I've flagged elsewhere, I'm taking steps to move the language reading title back to its former wording. Do NOT make major changes without consensus, and certainly not before discussion on the talk page; this unilateral action now characterises your activity.

No one will believe that you suddenly sprouted this username from out there. I ask again, what was your former username? Were you banned? TONY (talk) 04:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)