| Revision as of 00:45, 5 July 2008 editA Nobody (talk | contribs)53,000 edits →Userbox request.: Happy Independence Day!← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:44, 7 July 2008 edit undoTheserialcomma (talk | contribs)3,804 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| # ] | # ] | ||
| </div><!--Template:Archivebox ends--> | </div><!--Template:Archivebox ends--> | ||
| == stop vandalizing/reverting/deleting the ] article == | |||
| Mcjeff, I please ask that you consider discontinuing your actions in the tucker max article. It seems as if you are very quick to revert an article when you object to the changes, which is a fair course of action; however, you then consistently fail to contribute to the article by amending your own proposed, and supposedly-more-NPOV, changes. Deleting and reverting all attempts at a controversy section, while agreeing that a controversy section should exist, is not productive. The reason that I request that you cease with this activity because I don't think your actions are positively affecting the quality of the article. Instead, your actions, to some, might seem like an attempt at the censorship of a controversy section. Furthermore, please discontinue with your accusations of personal attacks when your actions are what's being being attacked, not your person. And finally, please discontinue claiming 'potential libel' in situations where it is clearly not libel. This is an inappropriate misuse of legal terminology and unnecessary. This message is in reference to the ] article. Thanks. ] (]) 19:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for Mediation? == | == Request for Mediation? == | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 7 July 2008
stop vandalizing/reverting/deleting the Tucker Max article
Mcjeff, I please ask that you consider discontinuing your actions in the tucker max article. It seems as if you are very quick to revert an article when you object to the changes, which is a fair course of action; however, you then consistently fail to contribute to the article by amending your own proposed, and supposedly-more-NPOV, changes. Deleting and reverting all attempts at a controversy section, while agreeing that a controversy section should exist, is not productive. The reason that I request that you cease with this activity because I don't think your actions are positively affecting the quality of the article. Instead, your actions, to some, might seem like an attempt at the censorship of a controversy section. Furthermore, please discontinue with your accusations of personal attacks when your actions are what's being being attacked, not your person. And finally, please discontinue claiming 'potential libel' in situations where it is clearly not libel. This is an inappropriate misuse of legal terminology and unnecessary. This message is in reference to the Tucker Max article. Thanks. Theserialcomma (talk) 19:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Request for Mediation?
Since we've been talking about it already... BOZ (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
hint
we don't interpret the 24 hours for 3RR as a license. Revert warring that comes close is generally treated similarly to the literal time limit. See WP:3RR. The way to avoid problems is to go to discussion after the first revert. Just a hint, not a warning. DGG (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- What's this in reference to? The thing you saw on Gavin's talk page? I thought reverting another user's harassment didn't count as revert warring. McJeff (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
RE: PCE
He's been temporarily blocked. Nikki311 01:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey dude.
HI its me Dan. How are things with you? Im in Magaluf, Mallorca with my girlfriend, just thought id drop you a line and say hi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.26.63.164 (talk) 11:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Formal mediation
I would prefer to keep the number down to a manageable level in the case. Is there someone you believe accurately represents your point of view who is already an active party to the case? Is there anything in particular you feel I should be aware of as the mediator? Feel free to drop a line on my talk page or send me an email if you prefer. Cheers! Vassyana (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages meetup
As someone who may live or work near Washington D.C., you may be interested - if you've not heard already - about the meetup scheduled for Saturday, May 17th, at Union Station. For details, please see Misplaced Pages:Meetup/DC 4.
You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians in Maryland. Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Your 3RR warning to me re the Little Green Footballs edit war (24 May 2008)
Sorry to teplate you, but I'd rather not see one of the good ones get slapped with a ban.
No problem, and thanks for stepping in. I'd like to see this resolved peacefully. HiramShadraski (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Doughface
Hi. Any particular reason for reverting this editor's 2006 blanking of his user and user talk pages? It seems like that's his prerogative but maybe I'm missing something. --A. B. 03:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
...to be honest I don't know/remember why I did that. McJeff (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- OK. I have those moments, too! I went ahead and reverted your changes. --A. B. 21:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
LGF
Thanks for the note, I've added my 2c to the AN/I report Canadian Monkey (talk) 02:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: the RobJ1981 thing
You haven't done/said anything that's out of line (yet anyway).
If Fut. Perf. takes any action that is not supported by consensus, it should go directly to ArbCom. It'd be grossly inappropriate not just to take action against consensus, but to act even after there is sufficient concern that he's involved. This is particularly so when a very reasonable request was made for a completely uninvolved admin to look into this long-term dispute that has exhausted all other steps of dispute resolution.
But, that's only if Fut. Perf. decides to step out of line. Momentarily, Hesperian is handling it exceptionally well. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Vacation.
I hope you enjoy dude. Dan the Man1983 (talk) 05:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Enemies article
I had to modify your deletions a little bit, since you had gotten rid of a fair few many-appearance enemies. Just explaining so it doesn't seem like I was wholesale reverting you.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
General note
Hello! Hey, thanks for the nice comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series (2nd nomination). After participating in one somewhat mind boggling ongoing discussion, I am a bit disilliosioned at the moment and I suppose it's nice to see a discussion where someone agreed with me and where at least one participant even changed his stance. Anyway, take care! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 08:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Re: Please explain to me
Please provide a link to the "Bush should be impeached" userbox and I'll gladly delete it. I'm sorry for the terse removal of your userbox, but similar "I can't stand " userboxes have spawned numerous shitstorms before and necessitated the creation of WP:CSD#T1. Regards, ˉˉ╦╩ 20:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you have against Barack; but the Anetode had no right to delete your userbox without taking it to MfD. Do you want me to restore it? --Orange Mike | Talk 13:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Please do restore. McJeff (talk) 14:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Userbox request.
Hi dude, I was wondering since you're so keen on making userboxes, could you do me a favour and make one for me?
I just want to show my support for the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, so could you possibly make a "This user supports Gordon Brown" userbox for me please. Dan the Man1983 (talk) 00:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Happy Independence Day!
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)