| Revision as of 07:48, 15 July 2008 editEsradekan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,821 edits d← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:53, 16 July 2008 edit undoKmweber (talk | contribs)6,865 edits →My Parents Favorite Music: I'm differentNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''' — It clearly exists; nothing else matters. ] ('''<span style="background-color: white; color: blue">Go</span> <span style="background-color: blue; color: white">Colts!</span>''') 04:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''' — It clearly exists; nothing else matters. ] ('''<span style="background-color: white; color: blue">Go</span> <span style="background-color: blue; color: white">Colts!</span>''') 04:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| **'''Comment:''' "Speedy keep" is only valid if the nomination is out of process, which this is not, or ] of being deleted, which is not true here since there are already arguments for deletion (which at this point outnumber those to keep). It does not simply mean "I strongly believe this should be kept". — ] | ] 07:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | **'''Comment:''' "Speedy keep" is only valid if the nomination is out of process, which this is not, or ] of being deleted, which is not true here since there are already arguments for deletion (which at this point outnumber those to keep). It does not simply mean "I strongly believe this should be kept". — ] | ] 07:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ***It does when I use it. ] ('''<span style="background-color: white; color: blue">Go</span> <span style="background-color: blue; color: white">Colts!</span>''') 15:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', article fails to establish notability as per ]. <small>] <sup>]</sup></small> 07:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', article fails to establish notability as per ]. <small>] <sup>]</sup></small> 07:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 16 July 2008
My Parents Favorite Music
- My Parents Favorite Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I believe this fails WP:MUSIC. Prod was contested, and I held off on the nomination for a while, but author has failed to produce reliable sources, and an anonymous editor removed the notability tag w/o explanation. RayAYang (talk) 02:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Good luck in the future MPFM, but you meet none of the WP:music criteria that we have agreed upon here.--CastAStone/ 03:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete0 google news results, no notable sources, user has been asked to add good sources. I think it fails music notability criteria. Atyndall93 | talk 03:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax So let it be done 03:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep — It clearly exists; nothing else matters. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 04:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: "Speedy keep" is only valid if the nomination is out of process, which this is not, or doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being deleted, which is not true here since there are already arguments for deletion (which at this point outnumber those to keep). It does not simply mean "I strongly believe this should be kept". — Gwalla | Talk 07:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- It does when I use it. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: "Speedy keep" is only valid if the nomination is out of process, which this is not, or doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being deleted, which is not true here since there are already arguments for deletion (which at this point outnumber those to keep). It does not simply mean "I strongly believe this should be kept". — Gwalla | Talk 07:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb 07:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)