Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:35, 18 July 2008

Image copyright problem with Image:He's a Twit -- Roald Dahl.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:He's a Twit -- Roald Dahl.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Use of minor edit box

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Andjam (talk) 13:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: About Mu`awwidhatayn

I really do not have any feelings one way or the other on the matter as I am very unfamiliar with the finer points of how Islamic topics are supposed to be covered on Misplaced Pages. I was on vandal patrol last night and I noticed that a lot of information was being removed from that article so I reverted it. Later I realized/was told that the removal was done in good faith and I removed the edits I had done. If you feel the information is appropriate for the article, by all means readd it. If the other user starts removing it again, you could add it back in once more and leave an edit summary along the lines of "restore info. see talk page" and then discuss your reason for wanting the info in the article on the talk page. Whatever you do, try to remember to remain civil and don't engage in a revert war as that could result in a block. Hope that helps and thank you for helping contribute to Misplaced Pages! Regards. Thingg 14:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:He's a Twit — Roald Dahl.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:He's a Twit — Roald Dahl.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Andjam (talk) 11:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Elazeez, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

May you enjoy your stay on wikipedia. Please don't hesitate to contact me.Bless sins (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ahmad Deedat 1.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Ahmad Deedat 1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

• • I've put up the required tag. Shouldn't be a problem now I hope

'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ahmad Deedat.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ahmad Deedat.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Islamic view of anal sex

Hey Elazeez! I reinstated the change you had reverted in the above-mentioned article. I would be curious to understand your point of view. Why don't you leave me a message? Cheers Mrbluesky (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello again, and thanks for taking the time to reply. I see your point (and incidentally I agree that the sources provided are feeble at best), but in any case, the statement made in the article and the sources do not concur. You are of course entitled to keep the statement, but I believe taht you should then delete the reference to the sources entirely in the article, to keep the article is consistent. Have a brilliant day ! Mrbluesky (talk) 12:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Criticism of Islam

Thank you for making the edits in Criticism of Islam. However, please remember this article is about criticms not responses to the criticisms. Your "responses" section is longer than the criticisms section. Please could you replace it with a smaller section perhaps with links to some of your articles, of the same rough format as the criticisms section. If you don't do this someone else will remove the whole section. Mike Young (talk) 12:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Respect to Islam

Greetings most benevolent Elazeez.

I grew up with the stories of the old and the new testament, the old testament was for me a reason to study polytheism and the new testament was for me a reason to study Human Rights. My religion of choice is Syncretic Polytheism, but I also have respect for Monotheism.

I think it is very sad that people have disrespected Islam.

This proves that European sentiment is still Nazi savagery, I'm European and I can't stand racism & prejudices. Judaism & islam have been victimised and the justice system worldwide has been bribed, I pray for the people in Iraq. The Iraq war & Afghanistan war are all based on false premises, so basically the lies, hatred & imbecility started hatred towards Islam and I had enough of these prejudices.

Because white supremacists gave Europeans a bad name and I had enough. Phalanx Pursos 01:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for uploading images/media to Misplaced Pages! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Misplaced Pages:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaK 11:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

From Bless_sins

Assalamualikum!

I wanted to pay my greeting to you, after having seen you around. I think that your conclusion on wikipedia and the Qur'an is very interesting.Bless sins (talk) 06:25, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanx for informing, all of his 5 edits have been vandalism. If he does it again he will be blocked as a vandal only account. I will monitor him. Cheers. --— Realist (Come Speak To Me) 17:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

It irked me to see in English the EXACT OPPOSITE of what is in the Arabic Hadith. The whole page needs a re-write. Unflavoured (talk) 07:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Contentious Claim in Zakir Naik Edit Summary

In a recent edit you state "Removing word 'Hafiz' since he is not one. (word slipped in by Agnistus during )" which is totally untrue since the word was added by Arthur in . Please refrain from indulging in such misbehavior. - Agnistus (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

BTW, Hafiz is a term used by Muslims for people who have completely memorized the Qur'an. So why not say Hafiz Dr. Zakir... - Agnistus (talk) 07:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Note: If replying, reply under Zakir Naik section in my talk page - Agnistus (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I understand. Thankyou - Agnistus (talk) 07:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Moved NPA section downwards & strike out

Dear Abdel, I have moved the NPA section you created downwards to where the de-striked comments were. Those comments were directed towards Itaqallah (not you) who has been sublimely rude to me from the very first time (before I was to him). I have also striked out (the hate-filled part of) the comment in question. Thankyou. - Agnistus (talk) 12:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Archive part of Talk:Zakir Naik

Talk:Zakir Naik is now over 120 KB.

I suggest moving the first 4 sections of Talk:Zakir Naik into Archive 2:

• 1 Article is still disputed.
• 2 Article should be deleted.
• 3 Article must be balanced.
• 4 What the article really needs is:

Please tell me if you agree by 20:00, June 20th 2008 (UTC). Thankyou. - Agnistus (talk) 12:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with the archiving since all of these sections involve current discussion. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 07:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Islam and Sikhism

Respected User:Elazeez, Thank you very much for your kind advice. Actually, I did not delete any information from this article and I did not add any information to this article either, I was just struggling to save it from vandalism. If you read my comments in User talk:90.192.59.97, you can easily conclude that this guy has extremist right wing Hindu idiology. Eventhough I requested him to refrain from doing vandalism in religious articles, he still kept distorting Sikh religious information either to make it appear anti-muslim or to make a fun of it... Singh6 (talk) 01:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Judaism's view of Muhammad

I replied to you my talk page. ephix (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Copying from Ephix's talkpage

Shalom aleichem brother Ephix. Noticed your recent edits to two articles (viz. Qur'an and Muhammed (pbuh)) and thought I'd pay you a a visit to offer kind greetings. Your latest article Judaism's view of Muhammad seems like its off to a good start, and Insha'Allah I too will try helping expand it with some of the authentic resources that I have. Please do let me know if you need any authentic resources/information about Muhammad(pbuh)'s life or the Islamic connections to Judaism. Shalom 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Abd, thanks for the greetings. I would like to point that this article is distinct from the article Muhammad and the Jews in that it deals with Judaism's view of Muhammad as the tile might indicate. I will thus be edit and mainly summarising your edits as the main purpose of the article is deal with Muhammad from a religious perspective, as opposed to a purely historical one. Please see more on the article's talk page. Thanks again. ;) ephix (talk) 20:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... That's odd, I didn't know that article (viz. Muhammad and the Jews) existed. Nevermind though, I'll assist with editing and summarizing of the content that I've posted yesterday. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 06:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

That would be a great help. Please summarise it to a paragraph. Thanks! ephix (talk) 07:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:

Wa `alaykum as-Salam. Thanks for your concern... just been a bit busy! I'll be happy to have a quick look through the article. ITAQALLAH 17:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Agnistus Note

How do you know I am a South Indian ? - Agnistus (talk) 20:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know. T'was probably just a co-incidence. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 07:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

You recent additions to Zakir Naik was notable (Pope controversy & expansion of Yazid issue). I recommend you scale down the paragraph on the Yazid issues. Especially irrelevent to a BLP is material regarding location, name and duration of the lecture, quote: "organized a 10-day international Islamic conference and exhibition titled The Peace Conference at the Somaya grounds in Mumbai".

Also please avoid including un-encyclopedic sentences like: "According to Naik, it was the to be the first conference of its kind in the history of the Muslim world and was to be 'a global kaleidoscope presenting Islam as a religion of peace and to explain that justice, human rights, moral values and peace are a must for effective human progress and global unity."

Try to keep things short, informative and to-the-point.

Thank you. - Agnistus (talk) 19:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

You are right, the article by Khaled covers several other views of Naik. You want to know why the other views were'nt covered as well. It is not practical to include all the points made in an article, since as I said before; while writing an Enclyclopedia "Try to keep things short, informative and to-the-point.". The pioint was selected because it was more significant than the other points and since the destruction of Bamiyan statues is queite an important incident w.r.t. the others. Nevertheless, you may add other points made in Khaled's article too, if you wish. - Agnistus (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Do not remove properly sourced content

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Zakir Naik appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Zakir Naik, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

- Agnistus (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome Agnistus (I've been around for quite a while though :). Have you had the chance to have a look at the talk page for Zakir Naik yet? 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I would like to talk to you

Dear Abdel, I would like to talk to you on phone. I believe you are residing in India (from your user page). Reply on my talk page or send me your cell-phone number to agnistus at gmail dot com. Yours sincerely, Agnistus (talk) 07:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC).

Dear Agnistus, I'm sorry I do not entertain any unsolicited phone calls, especially from people I come across on the internet... I hope you'll understand why. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 09:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

We could, however, have a hearty conversation on my talk page. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 09:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

P.S. A word of advice from a fellow Indian: considering the pros and cons of the amount of privacy the internet has to offer, it may not be prudent to give out your email ID on a publicly available webpage. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 09:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I personally feel a phone conversation would be a more effective way of sorting out matters. You still have the option to have a phone-discussion. - Agnistus (talk) 10:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC).

Umm, 'sorting out matters'? As co-editors for WP, I don't see any necessity for that. Thanks anyways, will consider your proposal some other time InshaAllah. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 10:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I would also like to discuss some non-WP stuff related to Islam, e.t.c. with you. What do you say? - Agnistus (talk) 10:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC).