Misplaced Pages

User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:48, 30 July 2008 editZlj2755 (talk | contribs)35 edits Class Extra Credit← Previous edit Revision as of 19:07, 30 July 2008 edit undoBoodlesthecat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,411 edits Deleting reliably sourced information and instigating edit wars.: new sectionNext edit →
Line 144: Line 144:


Thanks for the pointers, I am still new to everything. I will address the things you mentioned. I will also try to make a few more edits since the deadline is extended. Thanks again. ] (]) 17:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the pointers, I am still new to everything. I will address the things you mentioned. I will also try to make a few more edits since the deadline is extended. Thanks again. ] (]) 17:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

== Deleting reliably sourced information and instigating edit wars. ==

Please do not delete reliably sourced information, as you did , simply because you don't like it. and please do not start your old tactic of instigating edit wars and baiting editors into 3RR violations, as you have dont in the past and are trying to do . . As an Misplaced Pages admin, and a college professor, please behave more professionally and honestly. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 19:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:07, 30 July 2008

This user wrote 632 DYKs: 632 This user wrote 82 Good-class articles.: 82 This user wrote 6 A-class articles.: 6 =This user wrote 22 Featured-class articles.: 22
There is no Cabal

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Misplaced Pages Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.
Archive
Archive

Talk archives:

Extended content

Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014), Archive 53 (created 20 April, 2015), Archive 54 (created 21 September, 2015), Archive 55 (created 4 March, 2016), Archive 56 (created 25 August, 2016), Archive 57 (created 22 December, 2016), Archive 58 (created 1 May, 2017), Archive 59 (created 1 March, 2018), Archive 60 (created 10 July, 2018), Archive 61 (created 6 March, 2019), Archive 62 (created 13 November, 2019), Archive 63 (created 23 March, 2020), Archive 64 (created 1 September, 2020), Archive 65 (created 13 February, 2021) add new archive

Archiving icon

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Reasons for my raising wikistress:

Some general observations on Misplaced Pages governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
Misplaced Pages is a kawaii mistress :)


I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online

Social interface

Hello Piotrus. I added Category:Sociological theories in the article Social interface. I think that's a correct category. It's a very good article and I hope it qualifies for the DYK. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Piotrus, it is difficult to answer the question you asked. I did some research and I couldn't find the answer. If you find the answer, please let me know. By the way, N. Long seems to be a notable sociologist. We can create his biography. Do you have any information about him? Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Social interface DYK

Updated DYK query On 24 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Social interface, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

In praise of an excellent article

Hello! I was reading your article Battle of Kostiuchnówka and I wanted to tell you how much I enjoyed it. This is an excellent article and I learned something I did not previously know. Thank you so much for your contributions! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of CINTAX

A tag has been placed on CINTAX requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters21:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Of possible interest?

Hello again! There is an AfD discussion going on about an article relating to a Polish band called Pyorrhoea . I think there may be an unfair rush to get this article deleted. If this subject is of interest, you may want to look into this and offer your comments. Hope all is well. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Weekly

Hello there! New: Episode 58: Wikimania 2008, Jimbo and Reflections. Have a listen. Also, if you haven't heard, all of the other Wikimania episodes are up and accessible through the homepage at http://wikipediaweekly.org. Peace. WODUPbot 09:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Student project

Hi, I reviewed Technophobia, failed it because it had a lot of work to do before meeting standards, and then it was quickly renominated. Someone notified me that the article was nominated even before a lot of my concerns were addressed, and that's when I realized it was one of your students. I will assume that you have given the students a set of housekeeping steps before submitting GANs, but in any case, I will list a few basic ones here to reiterate:

  • Format references according to WP:CITE/ES, which especially requires that at least publisher and access dates for URLs are included. This is often overlooked but is very important.
  • Ensure that every paragraph has a reference at the end; of course, this is not a strict requirement, but it makes it a lot easier for reviewers to know that all of the information in the article is referenced to something.
  • The lead should be a summary of the entire article rather than simply an introduction.

These are the primary points that can be done by nominators; I am more than willing to help by moving references after punctuation marks if they aren't placed properly as those are just small maintenance work, but the above points need to be done by the nominators before nominating articles. Cheers! Gary King (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey dude!

Just saw your post here after peeing on a fire. Had to grin with the image of you and students! Anyhow, just saying hi! (You must be a "real bastard" to make students WRITE in the summer heat! <g>) // FrankB 07:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Saint Anne's Mountain

Hi Piotrus, could you help me out with this newly created article Battle of Saint Anne's Mountain? And could you possibly nominate it for DYK? Thanks. Tymek (talk) 19:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

DYKs

Thanks for your kind words. You can see whole list at User:Darwinek/DYK. - Darwinek (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

DYK nom

Updated DYK query On 30 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nicholas of Poland, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--Wizardman 02:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Class Extra Credit

Hello, this is Zach from our Societies course. Here is the diff for an edit I did for an extra point. I might try to do another one before tomorrow afternoon. Zlj2755 (talk) 06:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I just did another edit for an extra point. The previous survey results on church attendance and religious importance were not sourced so I found a source and replaced it, adding a decent sized paragraph. Here is the diff for that edit. Zlj2755 (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


Thanks for the pointers, I am still new to everything. I will address the things you mentioned. I will also try to make a few more edits since the deadline is extended. Thanks again. Zlj2755 (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Deleting reliably sourced information and instigating edit wars.

Please do not delete reliably sourced information, as you did here, simply because you don't like it. and please do not start your old tactic of instigating edit wars and baiting editors into 3RR violations, as you have dont in the past and are trying to do here. . As an Misplaced Pages admin, and a college professor, please behave more professionally and honestly. Boodlesthecat 19:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)